Sjudging a policy proposal by the company it keeps: The gore-perot NAFTA debate

Quarterly Journal of Speech

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 274-287

  Simons, Herbert W ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542398732     PISSN: 00335630     EISSN: 14795779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00335639609384156     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. A1 Gore’s big knockout. (1993, November 11). The Wall Street Journal, p. A14.
2. Aristotle (1991). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. (G.A. Kennedy, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work n.d.)
3. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing arid thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
5. Burke, K. (1945/1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
7. Davis, B., & Frisby, M.K. (1993, November 10). Gore puts Perot on the defensive in Nafta debate. The Wall Street Journal, pp. A3-A6.
8. Dowd, M. (1993, November 10). Personalities and pictures: A made-for-TV debate. The New York Times, p. B14.
9. Farrell, T.B. (1993). Norms of rhetorical culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. Fisher, W.R. (1978). Toward a logic of good reasons. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64,376-384.
11. Fish, S. (1994). There’s no such thing as free speech, and it’s a good thifigtoo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on poWteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14,219-236.
13. Goldberg, J.A. (1990). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14,883-903.
14. Ifill, G. (1993, November 11). Both sides assert gain after debate over trade accord. The New York Times, pp. A1-A22.
15. Jamieson, K.H. (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age: The transformation of political speechmaking. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Jonsen, A.R., & Toulmin, S. (1990). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. A Larry King special—Ross Perot debates V.P. Al Gore on NAFTA. (9 November 1993). Larry King live. Cable News Network. (Transcript #961 available from Journal Graphics)
18. Kempton, M. (1995, April 6). Narco-democracy? New York Review of Books, p. 46.
19. Margolis, J. (1990). Reconciling realism and relativism. In H.W. Simons (Ed.), The rhetorical turn: Invention and persuasion in the conduct of inquiry (pp. 308-319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Margolis, J. (1991). The truth about relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21. Margolis, J. (1995). Beyond postmodernism: Logic as rhetoric. Argumentation, 9, 21-31.
22. McCloskey, D.N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23. Megill, A. (1989). What does the term “postmodern” mean? Annals of Scholarship, 6,129-151.
24. Murray, S.O. (1985). Toward a model of members’ methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 14, 31-40.
25. Perelman, C. (1979). The new rhetoric and the humanities. (W. Kluback, Trans.). Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
26. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
27. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer/Verlag.
28. Posner, R.A. (1990). The problems of jurisprudence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rosenbaum, D.E. (1993a, November 6). Perot debate seen as way to try to save trade pact. The New York Times, pp. 1-10.
32. Rosenbaum, D.E. (1993b, November 10). Gore and Perot duel on TV over the trade pact. The New York Times, pp. A1-B15.
33. Safire, W. (1993, November 11). Gore flattens Perot. The New York Times, p. A27.
34. Schiappa, E. (1995). Warranting assent: Case studies in argument evaluation. Albany: SUNY Press.
35. Simons, H.W. (1994). “Going meta”: Definition and political applications. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80,468-481.
36. Sperber D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
37. Talbot, M. (1992). ‘I wish you’d stop interrupting me!’: Interruptions and assymetries in speaker-rights in equal encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 18,451-466.
38. The Nafta debate that wasn’t. (1993, November 11). The New York Times; p. A29.
39. Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. TV debate seta cable record. (1993, November 10). Hie New York Times, p. A22.
41. Van Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem. Argumentation, 6,141-159.
42. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tus-caloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
43. Walton, D.N. (1989). Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Walton, D.N. (1992). Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance? Argumentation, 6,237-250.
45. Wenzel, J.W. (1990). Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives of Argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. (pp. 9-26) Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
46. Wills, G. (1992). Lincoln at Gettysburg: The words that remade America. New York: Simon & Schuster.