Hot spots in animal agriculture, emerging federal environmental policies and the potential for efficiency and innovation offsets

International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology

Volumn 2, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 228-242

  Wossink, Ada ^a,c   Wefering, Frank ^a,b,d,e,f  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Fort und Weiterbildung   (Germany)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d Rupprecht Consult Forsch B   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^f European Union   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal agriculture; Efficiency offsets; Environmental policy; Innovation offsets; Porter hypothesis

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LIVESTOCK FARMING; POLLUTION CONTROL; STOCKING DENSITY;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1542379022     PISSN: 14624605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Altman, M. (2001) 'When green isn't mean: economic theory and the heuristics of the impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness and opportunity costs', Ecological Economics, Vol. 36, pp.31-44.
2. Schleef, K.-H. and Kleinhans, W. (1997) 'Nitrogen balances at regional level in the European Union', in F. Brouwer and W. Kleinhans (Eds.) The Implementation of Nitrate Policies in Europe: Processes of Change in Environmental Policy and Agriculture, Kiel, Germany: Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk.
3. This must be based on objective criteria such as long growing season, crops with high N-absorption rates, high net precipitation, or soils with exceptionally high denitrification capacities, which would be the case with high groundwater tables.
4. Frederiksen, B.S. (1997) 'Legislation in response to the Nitrate Directive - aspects for some EU countries', in F. Brouwer and W. Kleinhans (Eds.) The Implementation of Nitrate Policies in Europe: Processes of Change in Environmental Policy and Agriculture, Kiel, Germany: Vauk.
5. Kleinhanss, W., Becker, H. and Schleef, K.-H. (1997) 'Impacts of agri-environmental policy measures on nitrogen emissions from agriculture', in E. Romstad, J. Simonsen and A. Vatn (Eds.) Controlling Mineral Emissions in European Agriculture, Wallingford U.K.: CAB International.
6. The number of pig farms dropped more than 45% during the 1992-1997 period whereas the number of animals increased by over 28% [11].
7. Letson, D., Gollehon, N., Breneman, V., Kascal, C. and Mose, C. (1998) 'Confined animal production and groundwater protection', Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 20, pp.348-364.
8. Drabenstott, M. (1998) 'This little piggy went to market: will the new pork industry call the heartland home', Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp.79-97. Available from http://www.kc.frb.org.
9. Except in the event of a rainfall that exceeds the 25-year, 24-hour storm conditions.
10. Selinsky Johnson, R., Wheeler, W.J. and Christensen, L.A. (1999) 'EPA's approach to controlling pollution from animal feeding operations: an economic analysis', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 81, No. 5, pp.1216-1221.
11. Featherstone, J.W. and Atwood, J.D. (1999) 'The role of economics in producers' waste management decisions', Paper presented at the 1999 AAEA Meeting, Nashville, TN.
12. Some EU-countries and states in the USA have policies that include phosphate, the proposed federal policies of the USA and the EU however solely address nitrate.
13. Rainfall and temperature affect leaching and denitrification.
14. Aldy, J.E., Hrubovcak, J. and Vasavada, U. (1998) 'The role of technology in sustaining agriculture and the environment', Ecological Economics, Vol. 26, pp.81-96.
15. Porter, M.E. and Van der Linde, C. (1995) 'Towards a new conception of environment-competitiveness relationships', Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, pp.119-132.
16. Xepapadeas, A. and de Zeeuw. A. (1999) 'Environmental policy and competitiveness: the Porter Hypothesis and the composition of capital', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 37, pp.165-182.
17. The 'X' denotes an unknown influence affecting the technical efficiency of production [40, p.53]. In agriculture this unknown influence is considered very important [41].
18. Ribaudo, M.O. and Horan, R.D. (1999) 'The role of education in nonpoint source pollution control policy', Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 21, pp.331-343.
19. Getzner, M. (1999) 'Cleaner production, employment effects and socioeconomic development', International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp.522-543.
20. A major limiting factor of the potential of innovation offsets is the time it takes to accumulate enough technical knowledge [42].
21. Srivastava, L., Batie, S.S. and Norris, P.E. (1999) 'The Porter Hypothesis, property rights, and innovation offsets: the case of Southwest Michigan pork producers', Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Nashville TN. Available from http://agecon.lib.umn.edu.
22. Smith, V.K. and Walsh, R. (2000) 'Do painless environmental policies exists?', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.73-94.
23. By 1998 the application standards were replaced by surplus standards for both phosphate and nitrogen per hectare and a prohibitive tax on surpluses exceeding the standards. See Breembroek et al. [43] for more details about the Three Phase Plan.
24. Silage corn was predominantly grown as a waste disposal crop comparable to Bermuda grass in Southeastern USA.
25. Jongbloed, A.W. and Lenis, N.P. (1998) 'Environmental concern about animal manure', Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 76, No. 10, pp.2641-2648.
26. LEI-DLO (various years) 'Landbouw, milieu en economie', Periodieke Rapportage, Vol. 68, pp.89, 91, 92, 95, Den Haag.
27. LEI-DLO (1997) 'Landbouw Economisch Bericht 1997', Periodieke Rapportage pp.1-97, Den Haag.
28. Daatselaar, C.H.G. (1999) Personal Communication LEI-DLO.
29. The entire data set is available from the authors upon request.
30. CAFOs included in this analysis are poultry and pig producing operations. Compared to CAFOs, the pig farms analysed here are considerably smaller in size.
31. LEI-DLO (1988) 'De financiële positie van de landbouw', Periodieke Rapportage, Vol. 12, pp.86-87, Den Haag.
32. LEI-DLO & CBS (various years) Landbouwcijfers, Deb Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek & Landbouw-Economisch Instituut.
33. Parks, R.W. (1967) 'Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated', Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 62, pp.500-509.
34. The nitrogen surplus (per hectare) is the amount of nitrogen (per hectare) left on the farm during a production year. The input of nitrogen includes the purchase of fertiliser, organic manure, feed and (young) animals. The output of nitrogen includes livestock, livestock products (milk) and crop products sold, as well as animal manure that is transported and being applied elsewhere. The nitrogen surplus is assessed by means of an accounting scheme registering nitrogen entering (input) and leaving (output) the farm and accounting for the maximum admissible application on the farm's acreage. N application was calculated indirectly on basis of the phosphorus content in manure and a fixed N:P ration of 2:1 [4]. In addition to the cost of disposal a farmer would incur a surplus fee. This fee was DFL 0.25 per kg of phosphate for every kg of phosphate over 125 kg per ha and DFL 0.50 per kg for the surplus over 200 kg per hectare. This fee was imposed to finance the 'national manure bank', an institution responsible for promotion and coordination of efficient transport of manure surpluses.
35. Greene, W.H. (1993) Econometric Analysis, New York: Macmillan.
36. Jongbloed, A.W. and Lenis, N.P. (1992) 'Alteration of nutrition as a means to reduce environmental pollution by pigs'. Livestock Production Science, Vol. 31, pp.75-94.
37. Lenis, N.P. (1989) 'Lower nitrogen excretion in pig husbandry by feeding: current and future possibilities', Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 37, pp.61-70.
38. Coppoolse, J., van Vuuren, A.M., Huisman, J., Jansen, W.M.M.A., Jongbloed, A.W., Lenis, N.P. and Simons, P.C.M. (1990) De uitscheiding van stikstof, fosfor en kalium door landbouwhuisdieren, nu en morgen, Onderzoek inzake de mest-en ammoniakproblematiek in de veehouderij, 3. Wageningen: Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries (in Dutch), 138 pp.
39. Leneman, H., Giesen, G.W.J. and Berentsen, P.B.M. (1993) 'Cost of reducing nitrogen and phosphorus emissions on pig farms in the Netherlands', Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 39, pp.107-119.
40. Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., and Munda, G. (2000) 'Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy', Ecological Economics, Vol. 32, pp.43-61.
41. Rougoor, C.W., Trip, G., Huirne, R.B.M. and Renkema, J.A. (1998) 'How to define and study farmers' management capacity: theory and use in agricultural economics', Agricultural Economics, Vol. 18, pp.216-272.
42. Parry, I.W.H., Pizer, W.A. and Fischer C.A. (2000) 'How important is technological innovation in protecting the environment', Discussion Paper 00-15, Washington: Resources for the Future.
43. Breembroek, J.A., Koole, B., Poppe, K.J. and Wossink, G.A.A. (1996) 'Environmental farm accounting: the case of the Dutch nutrient bookkeeping system', Agricultural Systems, Vol. 51, pp.29-40.