Effect of diclofenac sodium on the healing process of end-to-end anastomosis in carotid arteries of rabbits. Histopathological and biomechanical studies

International Angiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 431-437

  Freire Cerqueira, Nereide ^a   Hussni, C A ^a   Bonetti Yoshida, W ^a   Swain Muller S ^a   Sequeira, J L ^a   Rodrigues, A C ^a   Mattar, L ^a   Crocci, A J ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anastomosis, surgical; Carotid arteries; Diclofenac; Rabbits; Tensile strength; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

DICLOFENAC; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN; HEPARIN; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERY RECONSTRUCTION; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; HEALING; HISTOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; NONHUMAN; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RABBIT; RANDOMIZATION; RIGIDITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SKIN; SUTURING METHOD;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; BIOMECHANICS; CAROTID ARTERIES; DICLOFENAC; RABBITS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 1542375957     PISSN: 03929590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Tarnuzzer RW, Schultz GS. Biochemical analysis of acute and chronic wound environments. Wound Rep Reg 1996;4:321-5.
2. Leaper DJ. Blood vessels. In: Bucknall, TE, Ellis H, editors. Wound healing for surgeons. London: Bailliére Tindall; 1984.p.221-40.
3. Baxter TJ, O'Brien BM, Henderson PN, Bennett RC. The histopathology of small vessels following microvascular repair. Br J Surg 1972;59:617-22.
4. Wahl SM. Fibrosis: bacterial-cell-wall-induced hepatic granulomas. In: Gallin FI, Goldstein IM, Snyderman R, editors. Inflammation: basic principles and clinical correlates. New York: Raven Press; 1988.p.841-60.
5. Day RO. Mode of action of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Med J Aust 1988;148:195-9.
6. Brooks PM, Day RO. Nonsteroidal antiinflamatory drugs: differences and similarities. N Engl J Med 1991:324:1716-25.
7. Vane JR, Botting RM. Anti-inflammatory drugs and their mechanism of action. Inflamm Res 1998;47 Suppl 2:S78-87.
8. Ku EC, Wasvary JM, Cash WD. Diclofenac sodium (GP 45840, Voltaren), a potent inhibitor of prostaglandin synthetase. Biochem Pharmacol 1975;24:641-3.
9. Sallmann AR. The history of diclofenac. Am J Med 1986;80 Suppl 4B:29-33.
10. Todd PA, Sorkin EM. Diclofenac sodium: a reppraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1988;35:244-85.
11. Brogden RN, Heel RC, Pakes GE, Speight TM, Avery GS. Diclofenac sodium: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain of varying origin. Drugs 1980;20:24-48.
12. Kantor TG. Use of diclofenac in analgesia. Am J Med 1986;80 Suppl 4B:64-9.
13. Fatureto MC, Simões, MJ, Teixeira, VPA, Goldenberg S. Morphological and morphometric features of the inflammatory reaction caused by plain catgut suture in subcutaneous tissue of rats treated with diclofenac sodium. Acta Cir Bras 1989;4:5-9.
14. Prandi Filho W, Simões MJ, Kulay Junior L, Goldenberg S. Morphological and morphometric aspects of the inflammatory process induced by a cotton suture subcutaneously implanted in rats treated with diclofenac sodium. Acta Cir Bras 1988;3:32-7.
15. Calache Neto JE, Aun F, Younes RN. Effects of diclofenac sodium administration on colonic sutures in rats. Rev Bras Coloproctol 1992;12:37-46.
16. Tognini JRF, Goldenberg S, Simões MJ, Sauer L, Melo RL, Ortiz PLA. Effects of sodium didofenac on the abdominal wall healing in rats. Acta Cir Bras 1998;13:167-71.
17. Bandeira COP, Nigro AJT, Souza R, Goldenberg S. Comparative study of tracheal anastomosis using monofilament nylon suture in rabbits under diclofenac sodium action. Acta Cir Bras 1990;5:130-5.
18. Quirinia A, Viidik A. Diclofenac and indomethacin influence the healing of normal and ischaemic incisional wounds in skin. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1997;31:213-9.
19. Acland RD. Arterial anastomosis: common femoral artery. In: Acland RD, editor. Practice manual for microvascular surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Company; 1989.p.48-76.
20. Carlstedt CA, Nordin M. Biomechanics of tendons and ligaments. In: Nordin M, Frankel VH, editors. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1989.p.59-74.
21. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1996.p.718.
22. Montes GS, Junqueira LCU. The use of the picrosirius-polarization method for the study of the biopathology of collagen. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1991;86 Suppl III:1-11.
23. Sweat F, Puchtler H, Rosenthal SI. Sirius red F3BA as a stain for connective tissue. Arch Pathol 1964;78:69-72.
24. Carvalho I, Yoshida WB, Naresse LE, Angeleli AY, Fabris VE, Curi PR et al. Comparison of interrupted with continuous suture techniques in arterial end to end anastomosis of carotid arteries of rabbits: histologic and tensile strength evaluation. Cir Vasc Ang 1993;9:6-12.
25. Yoshida WB, Naresse LE, Angeleli AYO, Lastoria S, Defaveri J, Curi PR et al. The relationship between suture number and the healing process of end-to-end arterial anastomosis. Acta Cir Bras 1997;12:89-93.
26. Cherry GW, Hughes MN, Kingsnorth AN, Arnold FW. Wound healing. New York: Oxford University; 1995.p.3-23.
27. Minossi JG, Leite CVS, Naresse LE, Rodrigues MAM, Angeleli AYO, Kobayasi S. Sodium diclofenac effect in abdominal wall cicatrization in rats: histological, breaking strength and tissue collagen studies. Acta Cir Bras 2001;16:146-54.
28. Verderese LRM, Naresse LE, Leite CVS, Lucchiari PH, Kobayasi S. Action of diclofenac sodium on the small intestine of the rat after interruption of fecal peritonitis. Study of breaking strength and of tissue colagen concentration. Acta Cir Bras 1995;10:117-21.
29. Verderese LRM, Naresse LE, Leite CVS, Mercadante MCS, Sadatsune T, Curi PR et al. Action of sodium diclofenac on the rat colon after the interruption of stercoraceous peritonitis. Study of breaking strength and of tissue collagen concentration. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med S Paulo 1995;5:254-8.
30. Verderese LRM. A influência do diclofenaco de sódio na peritonite bacteriana tratada com lavagem da cavidade abdominal e gentamicina: estudo da translocação bacteriana. Botucatu, 1999. 197p. Doctoral Thesis - Paulista School of Medicine. Federal University of São Paulo.
31. Minossi JG, Leite CVS, Naresse LE, Rodrigues MAM, Curi PR, Kobayasi S. Sodium diclofenac effect on small bowel anastomosis in rats. Acta Cir Bras 1998;13:37-43.
32. Minossi JG, Leite CVS, Naresse LE, Rodrigues MAM, Burini RC, Kobayasi S. Action of sodium diclofenac on the colon anastomosis healing in the rat. Acta Cir Bras 1996;111:116-26.
33. Giddens DP. Hemodynamic factors and anastomotic intimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:1137-8.
34. Singh TM, Guzman RJ, Zarins CK. Effects of physical forces on vasoreactivity and lumen size. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:1130-1.
35. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. Lab Invest 1983;49:327-33.
36. Clowes AW, Reidy MA. Prevention of stenosis after vascular reconstruction: pharmacologic control of intimal hyperplasia: a review. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:885-91.
37. Lidman D, Daniel RK. The normal healing process of microvascular anastomoses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;15:103-10.
38. Lidman D, Lyczakowski T, Daniel RK. The morphology and patency of arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses throughout the first post-operative year. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:187-92.
39. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glagov S, Choi E, Giddens DP, Zarins CK. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:708-17.
40. Prescott MF, McBride CK, Venturini CM, Gerhardt SC. Leukocyte stimulation of intimal lesion formation is inhibited by treatment with diclofenac sodium and dexamethasone. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1989;14 Suppl 6:S76-81.
41. Gelderman PW, Berendsen W. Re-endothelialization of microvascular carotid end-to-side anastomosis in the rat. J Neurosurg 1979;51:785-95.
42. Tomasello F, Spadaro A, Albanese V, Conforti P. SEM evaluation of endothelial changes following end-to-side microvascular anastomoses in rats. J Neurosurg 1981;54:525-31.
43. Wieslander JB, Mecklenburg CV, Aberg M. Endothelialization following end-to-end and end-in-end (sleeve) microarterial anastomoses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 18:193-9.
44. Gahankari DR, Lalwani NR, Phatak AM. Classification and comparison of five techniques of end-to-end microarterial anastomoses in rats: a new proposed technique. Microsurgery 1995;16:793-802.
45. Gertz SD, Rennels ML, Forbes MS, Kawamura J, Sunaga T, Nelson E. Endotehelial cell damage by temporary arterial occlusion with surgical clips. J Neurosurg 1976; 45:514-9.
46. Acland RD, Trachtenberg L. The histopathology of small arteries following experimental microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59:868-75.
47. leGrand EK, Stoloff DR, Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z, Hardesty R. Dilatation in anastomosed arteries can be an artifact of explantation. Microsurgery 1992; 13:31-5.
48. Nightingale G, Fogdestam I, O'Brien B. Scanning electron microscope study of experimental microvascular anastomoses in the rabbit. Br J Plast Surg 1980;33:283-98.