Objects and subjects in technological interdependence. towards a framework to monitor innovation

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 295-309

  Archibugi, Daniele ^a   Simonetti, Roberto ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Innovation; R d; Technical change

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542371672     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13571519884404     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Acs, Z.J., and Audretsch, D.B., 1989. Small Firms and Innovation, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
2. Archibugi, D., 1988a. "In Search of a Useful measure of Technological Innovations". Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 34(3): 253–77.
3. Archibugi, D., 1988b. "The Inter-industry Distribution of Technological Capabilities,". Technovation, 7(3): 259–74.
4. Archibugi, D., 1992. "Patenting as an Indicator of Technological Innovation: A Review. Science and Public Policy, 19(6): 357–68.
5. Archibugi, D., and Howells, J., 1999. and Michie, J. eds., Innovation Systems in a Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Archibugi, D., and Pianta, M., 1992. The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries. A Report to the EEC on International Science and Technology Activities, Boston: Kluwer.
7. Arrow, K., 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," ”. In NBER, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Basberg, B., 1987. "Patents and the Measurement of Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature,". Research Policy, 16(24): 131–41.
9. Bergeron, S., Lallich, S., and La Bas, C., 1996. "Industrial Location of Innovative Activities and Technological Specialisation: A Structuralist Approach to National Systems of Innovation,". AEA Conference 'Econometrics of Innovation: Patents' Luxembourg. November28-291996. mimeo
10. Brown, M., and Conrad, A., 1967. "The Influence of Research and Education on Ces Production Relations," ”. In NBER, The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, New York: Columbia University Press.
11. Carlsson, B., and Jacobsson, S., 1996. "Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics: Implications for Firms and Governments," ”. In Behavioural Norms, Technological Change and Economic Dynamics, Edited by: Helmstadter, E., and Perlman, M., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12. Carter, A., 1989. "Knowhow Trading as Economic Exchange,". Research Policy, 18: 155–63.
13. Cesaratto, S., and Mangano, S., 1992. "Technological Profiles and Economic Performance in the Italian Manufacturing Sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 2: 237–56.
14. Chesnais, F., 1988. "Technical Co-operation Agreements Between Firms. Science Technology Industry Review, OECD
15. DeBresson, C., 1986. Conceptual Notes on The Measurement of Innovation, Paris: OECD.
16. DeBresson, C., 1990. "L'analyse inter-industriel et le changement technologique: une recension,". Revue deconomie politique, 10: 833–69.
17. DeBresson, C., ed. 1996. Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity: An input-Output Analysis, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
18. DeBresson, C., and Amesse, F., 1991. "Networks of Innovators: A Review and Introduction to the Issue,". Research Policy, 20: 93–118.
19. DeBresson, C., and Townsend, J., 1978. "Notes on the Inter-industrial Flow of Technology in Post-war Britain,". Research Policy, 7: 48–60.
20. DeBresson, C., Sirilli, G., Kwan Luk, F., and Xiaoping, L., 1992. The Structure of Innovation and its Diffusion in Italy, mimeo. Schumpeter Society Conference, Kyoto, August
21. De Liso, N., and Metcalfe, J.S., 1996. "On Technological Systems and Technological Paradigms: Some Recent Developments in the Understanding of Technical Change," ”. In Behavioural Norms, Technological Change and Economic Dynamics, Edited by: Helmstadter, E., and Perlman, M., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22. Ducharme, L.M., 1987. Flax inter-sectoriels de brevets: Une mesure de la diffusion de l'innovation au Canada. Societede science economique, Universite de Sherbrooke.
23. Englander, A.S., Evenson, R., and Hanazaki, M., 1988. "R&D, Innovation, and the Total Factor Productivity Slow Down,". OECD Economic Studies, 11: 8–42.
24. Ergas, H., 1983. The Inter-Industry Flow of Technology: Some Explanatory Hypotheses, Paris: OECD.
25. Evenson, R., Kortum, S., and Putnam, J., 1988. Estimating Patents by Industry Using the Yale-Canada Patent Concordance, New Haven: Yale University. mimeo
26. Freeman, C., 1992. The Economics of Hope, London: Pinter.
27. Freeman, C., Clark, J., and Soete, L., 1982. Unemployment and Technical Innovation, London: Frances Pinter.
28. Freeman, C., and Soete, L., eds. 1990. New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change, London: Pinter.
29. Geroski, P., 1991. "Innovation and the Sectoral Sources of UK Productivity Growth,". Economic Journal, I01: 1438–51.
30. Gille, B., 1978. Histoire des techniques, Paris: Gallimard.
31. Granstrand, O., and Sjslander, S., 1990. "Managing Innovation in Multi-technology Corporations,". Research Policy, 19(1): 35–60.
32. Griliches, Z., 1990. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,". Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661–797.
33. Griliches, Z., and Lichtenberg, F., 1984. "Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination". Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(2): 324–329.
34. Hagedoorn, J., and Schakenraad, J., 1990. "Inter-Firm Partnership and Co-operative Strategies in Core Technologies" ”. In New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change, Edited by: Freeman, C., and Soete, L. London: Pinter.
35. Hansen, J., 1986. Innovation Indicators. Summary of an International Survey, Paris: OECD.
36. Jaffe, A., 1986. "Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D". American Economic Review, 76: 984–1001.
37. Kodama, F., 1986. "Technology Diversification of Japanese Industry,". Science, 233: 291–293.
38. Landes, D.S., 1969. Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1975 to the Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., and Winter, S., 1987. "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,". Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics,: 783–831.
40. Leontief, W., 1989. "Input-Output Data Base for the Analysis of Technological Change,". Economic System Research, 1(3): 287–95.
41. Lundvall, B., 1985. Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction, Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
42. Lundvall, B., ed. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
43. Marengo, L., and Sterlacchini, A., 1990. "Intersectoral Technology Flows. Methodological Aspects and Empirical Applications,". Metroeconomica, 41(1): 19–39.
44. Massini, S., 1996. "Inter-sectoral Flows of Technology: An International Comparison of Technological Specialisation Profiles,". AEA Conference 'Econometrics of Innovation: Patents'. November28-291996, Luxembourg. mimeo
45. Mensch, G., 1979. Stalemate in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression, Eng. trans, New York: Ballinger.
46. Metcalfe, J.S., 1995. "Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework,". Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 25–46.
47. Momigliano, F., and Siniscalco, D., 1984. "Technology and International Specialization,". Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 154: 257–84.
48. Nelson, R., "The Generation and Utilization of Technology: A Cross-industry Analysis,". Conference on Innovation Diffusion. March. University of Venice. mimeo
49. Nelson, R., ed. 1992. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Niwa, F., 1992. The Measurement of Technology Diversification using Patent Applications, in AA. W., Science and Technology policy Research, Tokyo: Mita Press.
51. OECD. 1981. “ The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities—"Frascati Manual" ”. Paris: OECD.
52. 1987. Report of the Workshop on Innovation Statistics Paris
53. Pavitt, K., 1984. "Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory,". Research Policy, 13(6): 343–73.
54. Pavitt, K., 1988. "Uses and Abuses of Patent Statistics," ”. In Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Edited by: van Raan, A., Amsterdam: Elsevier.
55. Pavitt, K., Robson, M., and Townsend, J., 1989. "Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983,". Management Science, 35: 81–99.
56. Polanyi, M., 1967. The Tacit Dimension, Garden City, NY: Doubleday Ancor.
57. Priest, W.C., and Hill, C.T., 1980. Identifying and Assessing Discrete Technological Innovations: An Approach to Output Indicators, Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
58. Robson, M., Townsend, J., and Pavitt, K., 1988. "Sectoral Patterns of Production and Use of Innovations in the U.K.: 1945-1983,". Research Policy, 17(1): 1–14.
59. Rosenberg, N., 1976. Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Rosenberg, N., 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Scherer, F.M., 1982a. "Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States,". Research Policy, 11(4): 227–45.
62. Scherer, F.M., 1982h. "Demand pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revised,". Journal of Industrial Economics, 30(3): 225–38.
63. Scherer, F.M., 1982c. "Inter-industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth,". Review of Economics and Statistics, 64: 627–34.
64. Scherer, F.M., Beckenstein, A., Kaufer, E., and Murphy, R.D., 1975. The Economics of Multi-Plant Operation: An International Comparison Study, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Schmookler, J., 1966. Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Schmookler, J., 1971. Patents, Invention and Economic Change. Data and Selected Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Schumpeter, J., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Schumpeter, J., 1939. Business Cycles. A Theoretical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
69. Schumpeter, J., 1942. Capitalism3 Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper.
70. Seguin Dulude, L., 1982. "Les flux technologiques interindustriels: Une analyse exploratrice du potentiel candien,". Actualite Economique, July: 259–81.
71. Simonetti, R., 1989. "Flussi tecnologici intersettoriali in Italia. Un'analisi su dati brevettuali," ”. Rome: University 'La Sapienza'.
72. Simonetti, R., 1998. "Technological Change," ”. In Firms, Edited by: Simonetti, R., Mackintosh, M., Castle, N., Dawson, G., Himmelweit, S., Trigg, A., and Wells, J., Milton Keynes: Open University.
73. Smith, K., 1990. New Innovation Indicators: Conceptual Basis and Practical Problems. OECD Conference of the Technology/Economy Programme. 1990, Paris. mimeo
74. Soete, L., 1986. Technological Change at the Sectoral Level: Or How to Cope with Inter-Sectoral Technology Flows, Pads: OECD.
75. Sterlacchini, A., 1989. "R&D, Innovation and Total Factor Productivity Growth in British Manufacturing,". Applied Economics, 21: 1549–62.
76. Terleckyj, N., 1980. “ Direct and Indirect Effects of Industrial R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries ”. In New Developments in Productivity Measurement Analysis, Edited by: Kendrick, J. W., and Vaccara, B. N., Chicago: NBER, Chicago University Press.
77. Torre, A., 1990. "Quand les economistes mesurent l'intangible (Note sur la transmission du savoir-faire technologique aux secteurs industriels,". Revue d'economie industrielle,: 87–98.
78. Torre, A., August 1992. Untraded and Technological Interdependencies: Some New Developments and Conclusions, August, Kyoto: International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society.
79. Townsend, J., Henwood, F., Thomas, G., Pavitt, K., and Wyatt, S., 1981. Science and Technology Indicators for the U.K. Innovations in Britain since 1945, SPRU Occasional Paper No. 16 Brighton
80. Utton, M., 1979. Diversification and Competition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. van Raan, A., ed. 1988. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
82. von Hippel, E., 1982. "Appropriability of Innovation Benefit as a Predictor of the Source of Innovation,". Research Policy, 11: 95–115.
83. von Hippel, E., 1987. "Cooperation Between Rivals: Informal Knowhow Trading,". Research Policy, 16: 291–302.
84. von Hippel, E., 1988. The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.