Quantum stochastic resonance in electron shelving

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 052111-052111

  Huelga, S F ^a,b,c   Plenio, M B ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAND STRUCTURE; COHERENT LIGHT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ELECTRON RESONANCE; FLUORESCENCE; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; LASERS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; RANDOM PROCESSES; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; THERMAL NOISE;

ELECTRON SHELVING; RABI FREQUENCIES; STOCHASTIC RESONANCE (SR);

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 1542365326     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052111     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. R. Benzi et al., J. Phys. A 14, L453 (1981).
2. There exist a class of systems for which the SNR may display a multiplicity of maxima, as described by J.M.G. Vilar and J.M. Rubí, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2882 (1997).
3. B. McNamara and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4854 (1989); K. Wiesenfeld and F. Moss, Nature (London) 373, 33 (1995).
4. B. McNamara and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4854 (1989); K. Wiesenfeld and F. Moss, Nature (London) 373, 33 (1995).
5. J.M.G. Vilar and J.M. Rubí, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2863 (1996).
6. S. Fauve and F. Heslot, Phys. Lett. 97A, 5 (1983).
7. L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998), and references therein.
8. J.E. Levin and J.P. Miller, Nature (London) 380, 165 (1996).
9. R. Löfstedt and S.N. Coppersmith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1947 (1994).
10. D.O. Reale, A.K. Pattanayak, and W.C. Schieve, Phys. Rev. E 51, 2925 (1995).
11. M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1611 (1996).
12. A. Buchleitner and R.N. Mantegna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3932 (1998); T. Wellens and A. Buchleitner, J. Phys. A 32, 2895 (1999).
13. A. Buchleitner and R.N. Mantegna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3932 (1998); T. Wellens and A. Buchleitner, J. Phys. A 32, 2895 (1999).
14. R. Saxena and G.S. Agarwal, J. Phys. B 13, 453 (1980).
15. ±i (i = 3,4) turns out to be ruled by decoupled differential equations. If initially present, these terms simply get exponentially damped. Note that, as opposed to the coherence terms between the dressed levels, the crossed coherences are not repopulated after an emission process.
16. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998).