Variations in citizen familiarity with growth management processes: Evidence from Florida

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 441-460

  Chapin, Tim ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen attitudes; Familiarity; Florida; Growth management

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PLANNING PROCESS; URBAN PLANNING;

FLORIDA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1542349978     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087403261257     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anglin, R. 1990. Diminishing utility: The effect on citizen preferences for local growth. Urban Affairs Quarterly 25 (4): 684-96.
2. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216-24.
3. Baldassare, M. 1984. Predicting local concern about growth: The roots of citizen discontent. Journal of Urban Affairs 6:39-49.
4. Baldassare, M. 1994. Regional variations in support for regional governance. Urban Affairs Quarterly 30 (2): 275-84.
5. Baldassare, M., J. Hassol, W. Hoffman, and A. Kanarck. 1996. Possible planning roles for regional government: A survey of city planning directors in California. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (1): 17-29.
6. Bollens, S. 1990. Constituencies for limitation and regionalism: Approaches to growth management. Urban Affairs Quarterly 26 (1): 46-67.
7. Burby, R. 2003. Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (1): 33-49.
8. Buttel, F., and W. Flinn. 1978. Social class and environmental beliefs: A reconsideration. Environment and Behavior 10 (3): 433-50.
9. Chapin, T., and C. Connerly. In press. Attitudes towards growth management in Florida: Comparing resident support in 1985 and 2001.Journal of the American Planning Association.
10. Connerly, C., and J. Frank. 1986. Predicting support for local growth controls. Social Sciences Quarterly 67 (3): 572-86.
11. Deakin, E. 1989. Growth control: A summary and review of empirical research. Urban Land 48 (7): 16-21.
12. DeGrove, J. 1992. Planning and growth management in the states. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
13. Dowall, D. 1980. An examination of population-growth-managing communities. Policy Studies Journal 9 (3): 414-27.
14. Florida Department of Community Affairs. 2000. Growth management survey report. Retrieved from http://sustainable.state.fl.us/fdi/fscc/resource/document/docs/sum3.pdf.
15. Florida Sustainable Communities. 2000. Governor Bush creates Growth Management Study Commission. Florida Sustainable Communities Center State/Regional News. Retrieved July 2, 2003, from http://sustainable.state.fl.us/fdi/fscc/news/state/0007/gmgtcom.htm.
16. Forester, J. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Gale, D., and S. Hart. 1992. Public support for local comprehensive planning under statewide growth management: Insights from Maine. Journal of Planning Education and Research 11:192-205.
18. Gottdiener, M., and M. Neiman. 1981. Characteristics of support for local growth controls. Urban Affairs Quarterly 17 (1): 55-73.
19. Growth Management Study Commission. 2001. A liveable Florida for today and tomorrow. Retrieved from http://www.floridagrowth.org/pdf/gmsc.pdf.
20. Healy, P. 1993. The communicative work of development plans. Environment and Planning A: Planning and Design 20:83-104.
21. Innes, J. 1995. Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14:183-88.
22. Klein, W. 2000. Building consensus. In The practice of local government planning, edited by C. Hoch, L. Dalton, and F. So, 423-38. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
23. Knaap, G. 1987. Self-interest and voter support for Oregon's land use controls. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 92-97.
24. Logan, J. 1978. Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. American Journal of Sociology 84 (2): 404-16.
25. Medler, J., and A. Mushkatel. 1979. Urban-rural class conflict in Oregon land use planning. Western Political Quarterly 3:343-49.
26. Porter, D. 1998. The states: Growing smarter? In Smart growth: Economy, community, environment, edited by the Urban Land Institute, 28-35. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
27. Protash, W., and M. Baldassare. 1993. Growth policies and community status: A test and modification of Logan's theory. Urban Affairs Quarterly 18 (3): 397-412.
28. Seibert, S. 1999. DCA chief calls for growth management reforms. Florida Planning 1:6.
29. Smutny, G. 1998. Legislative support for growth management in the Rocky Mountains. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (3): 311-23.
30. VanLiere, K., and R. Dunlap. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44:181-97.
31. Weitz, J. 1999. Sprawl busting: State programs to guide growth. Chicago: American Planning Association.