Two-dimensional nonlinear site response analysis of Adapazarι plain and predictions inferred from aftershocks of the Kocaeli earthquake of 17 August 1999

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 261-279

  Beyen, Kemal ^a   Erdik, Mustafa ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

2d effects; Adapazar plain; Aftershocks; Basin response; Earthquake; Kocaeli earthquakes; Nonlinearity; Prediction; Simulation; Site response

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; SOIL TESTING; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DEAMPLIFICATION; PEAK FREQUENCY SHIFTS;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

AFTERSHOCK; KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE 1999; NONLINEARITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SITE EFFECT;

ADAPAZARI PLAIN; EURASIA; SAKARYA; TURKEY;

EID: 1542348532     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alterman Z. Loewenthal D. Computer generated seismograms Bolt B.A. Methods in computational physics Seismology, body waves and sources vol. 12 1972 35-164 Academic Press New York
2. APM. Adapazar Revizyon Imar Planna Esas Jeolojik ve Jeoteknik Etüt Raporu, Adapazar, Büyükşehir Belediyesi Planlama Müdürlügü-Adapazar Great Municipality. Land planning Department, Adapazar 2000. (Turkish).
3. Frankel A. Carver D. Cranswick E. Meremonte M. Bice T. Overtruf D. Site response for seatle and source parameters of earthquakes in the puget sound region BSSA 89 2 1999 468-483
4. Bard P.-Y. Campillo M. Chavez-Garcia F.J. Sanchez-Sesma F.J. Strong ground motion in Mexico city during The Great Michoacan Earthquake. Part B: A theoretical investigation of large- and small-scale amplification effects Earthq Spectra 4 3 1988 609-633
5. Boore D.M. Finite difference methods for seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous materials Bolt B.A.A. Methods in computational physics Seismology, surface waves and earth oscillations vol. 11 1972 1-37 Academic Press New York
6. Safak E. Models and methods to characterize site amplification from a pair of records Earthq Spectra 13 1 1997 97-129
7. Frankel A. Vidale J. A Three-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara Valley, California, from a Loma Prieta Aftershock BSSA 82 1992 2045-2074
8. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/earthqk/earthqk.html; 1999 and 2001.
9. Iwan W.D. On A class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems Journal of Applied Mechanics 34 1967 612-617
10. Duncan JM, Byrne PM, Wong KS, Marby P. Strength, stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses. Report no: UCB/GT/80-01, University of California, Berkeley; 1980.
11. Boatwright J. Seekins L.C. Fumal T.E. Liu H.-P. Mueller C.S. Ground motion amplification in The Marina District BSSA 81 5 1991
12. Joyner W.B. Chen A.T.F. Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes BSSA 65 1975 1315
13. Joyner W.B. A method calculating nonlinear seismic response in two dimensions BSSA 65 1975 1337
14. Joyner WB. Fortran programs for calculating nonlinear seismic ground response in two dimensions'. US Geological Survey, Open File Report. p. 78-287.
15. Ercin Kasapoglu K. 17 Agustos 1999 Dogu Marmara Depreminin Jeoteknik Saha Inceleme Raporu, 8 October, 1999, Hacetepe University, Ankara (Turkish).
16. Kemal Beyen A. Study of two dimensional nonlinear analysis of site response. PhD Dissertation. Bogazici University, Istanbul; 1997.
17. Kocaeli U. Sakarya (Adapazari) Anakaya Tespit Projesi. Kocaeli Universitesi Yeralti Arastirma Birimi, Kocaeli Universitesi; 1998.
18. KOERI. Dinar earthquake of 1.10. Reconnaissance Report, October 9, 1995. Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake research Institute (KOERI); 1995.
19. Erdik M. Intensity assessments, March 13, 1992 (Ms=6.8) Erzincan earthquake: A preliminary reconnaissance report. Bogazici University; 1992.
20. Erdik M. Mission Report on Guerrero-Michoacan Mexico Earthquake of 19 September 1985, United Nations 1985 United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Earthquake Engineering Research Center Ankara, Turkey
21. Erdik M. Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) Earthquakes' Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Structural Control, Paris-France 6-8 2000 149-186
22. Nuray Aydinoglu M. Erdik M. 17 January 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (KOBE) Earthquake Reconnaissance and Assessment Report' 1995 Department of earthquake Engee., Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Bogazici University
23. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute (MREI). Geologic Map of Bursa. G22 series, Turkey, Scale. 1:25 000; 2000.
24. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Government of Republic of Turkey, Specification for Structures to Be Built in Disaster Areas (Turkish); 1998.
25. Ohta Y. Goto N. Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes Earthq Engng Struct Dyn 6 1978 167-187
26. Seed H.B. Idriss I.M. The influence of soil conditions on ground motions during earthquakes J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 94 1969 93-137
27. State Hydraulic Work-Devlet Su Işleri, Publication; 1983.
28. TUBITAK, ODTU, MTA. 17 Agustos 1999 Golcuk-Arifiye (Kuzeydogu Marmara) Depremleri Sonrasi Sakarya İli ve Ona Bagl Yerleş keler İçin Yerleşim Alanlar araştrma Raporu'. TUBITAK, ODTU and MTA-Turkey Science and Technology Consul, Middle East Technical University and Material Research and Exploration, Ankara; November 1999. (Turkish).