Summary Evaluation and Text Categorization

SIGIR Forum (ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval)

Volumn , Issue SPEC. ISS., 2003, Pages 443-444

  Ahmad, Khurshid ^a   Vrusias, Bogdan ^a   De Oliveira, Paulo C F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Summary evaluation; Text categorization; Training vectors

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA STRUCTURES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; TEXT PROCESSING; VECTORS;

SUMMARY EVALUATION; TEXT CATEGORIZATION; TRAINING VECTORS;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 1542347735     PISSN: 01635840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/860435.860542     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Ahmad, K., Vrusias, B., Ledford, A. Choosing Feature Sets for Training and Testing Self-organising Maps: A Case Study. Neural Comput & Applic (2001), 10(1), p.56-66.
2. Benbrahim, M. & Ahmad, K. Text Summarisation: The role of lexical cohesion analysis. The New Review of Document and Text Management (1995), Vol 1, 321-335.
3. Hand, T.F. A proposal for task-based evaluation of text summarization systems. ACL/EACL-97 Summarization Workshop (1997), 31-36.
4. Jones, K.S. Towards better NLP system evaluation. Human Language Technology Workshop (1994) San Francisco: ARPA, 102-107.
5. Kohonen, T. Self-organizing maps. Berlin, Heidelburg and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
6. Mani, I. & Maybury, M. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1999.
7. Paice, C.D. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects. Information Processing and Management (1990), 26(1), 171-186.
8. Radev, D.R., Jing, H., Budzikowska, M. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: sentence extraction, utility based evaluation, and user studies. NAACL-ANLP (2000), Seattle, WA, p.21-29. (and other ref. therein)
9. Tucker, R. Automatic summarising and the CLASP system. PhD thesis, Cambridge. 1999.