Composing Architectural Styles From Architectural Primitives

Proceedings of the Joint European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-11)

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 347-350

  Mehta, Nikunj R ^a   Medvidovic, Nenad ^a  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Alfa; Architectural primitive; Architectural style; Channel based communication; Style characterization; Style composition

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; CHANNEL CAPACITY; COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

ARCHITECTURAL STYLES; STYLE COMPOSITION; SYTLE CHARACTERIZATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 1542347182     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Abowd, G. D., Allen, R. J., and Garlan, D. Formalizing Style to Understand Descriptions of Software Architecture. ACM Trans. Software Engg. and Methodology, 4, 319-364, 1995.
2. Arbab F. Abstract behavior types: A foundation model for components and their composition. In Proceedings of the First Symposium on Formal Methods for Components and Objects, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2002.
3. Arbab, F. Reo: A channel-based coordination model for component composition. To appear in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2003.
4. Bell, C.G. and Newell, A. Computer structures: Reading and examples, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.
5. Bernardo, M., Ciancarini, P., and Donatiello, L. Architecting families of software systems with process algebra. ACM Trans. Software Engg. and Methodology, 11, 386-426, 2002.
6. Buschmann, F. et al. Pattern-oriented software architecture: a system of patterns. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England, 1996.
7. Fielding, R. Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California at Irvine, 2000.
8. le Metayer, D. Describing architectural styles using graph grammars. IEEE Trans. Software Engg., 24, 521-533, 1998.
9. Medvidovic, N. and Taylor, R. N. A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages. IEEE Trans. Software Engg., 26, 70-93, 2000.
10. Mehta, N. R., Medvidovic, N., and Phadke, S. Towards a taxonomy of software connectors. In Proceedings of 22nd Intl. Conf. on Software Engg., Limerick, Ireland, 2000.
11. Milner, R. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J, 1989.
12. Monroe, R. T. and Garlan, D. Style-based reuse for software architectures. In Proc. of the 4th Intl. Conf. on Software Reuse, Orlando, FL, USA, 1996.
13. Parnas, D. L. On the criteria to be used for decomposing systems into modules. Comm. of the ACM. 15, 1053-1058, 1972.
14. Perry, D. E. and Wolf, A. L. Foundations for the Study of Software Architectures. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engg. Notes, 17, 40-52, 1992.
15. Shaw, M. and Clements, P. A field guide to boxology: preliminary classification of architectural styles for software systems. In Proc. of the 21st Computer Software and Applications Conf., Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
16. Shaw, M. and Garlan, D. Software architecture: Perspectives on an emerging discipline. Prentice-Hall, 1996.