Multiple Method Comparison: Statistical Model Using Percentage Similarity

Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 46-53

  Scott, Lesley E ^a,b   Galpin, Jacky S ^b   Glencross, Deborah K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Accuracy and precision; Bland Altman difference plots; Coefficient of variation; Histogram (frequency distribution); Percentage similarity; Statistical multiple method comparison

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HISTOGRAM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; T LYMPHOCYTE; BIOMETRY; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICS;

BIOMETRY; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 1542346396     PISSN: 15524949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.10016     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. + lymphocyte cell enumeration for prediction of clinical course of HIV disease: a review. J Infect Dis 1992;165:352.
2. + T-cell enumeration. Clin Cytometry 2002;50:69-77.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;8:307-310.
4. Simson E, Groner W. Variability in absolute lymphocyte counts obtained by automated cell counters. Cytometry 1995;22:26-34.
5. + cell count measurement variability on staging HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1992;5:794.
6. Pollock MA, Jefferson SG, Kane JW, Lomax K, MacKinnon G, Winnard CB. Method comparison - a different approach. Ann Clin Biochem 1992;29:556-560.
7. Krouwer JS, Monti KL. A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995;33:525-527.