Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 582-589

  Holloway, S ^a   Porteous, M ^a   Cetnarskyj, R ^a,b   Anderson, E ^a,c   Rush, R ^a   Fry, A ^a   Gorman, D ^d   Steel, M ^e   Campbell, H ^b  

^a WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c Ardmillan House ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d NHS LOTHIAN   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cost; Expectations; Genetic counselling; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CENTER; CANCER GENETICS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMICS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NURSE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL WELFARE; STAFF; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCOTLAND;

EID: 1542329177     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601562     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Austoker J, Ong G (1994) Written information needs of women who are recalled for further investigation of breast screening: results of a multicentre study. J Med Screen 1: 238-244
2. Brain K, Gray J, Norman P, Parsons E, Clarke A, Rogers C, Mansel R, Harper P (2000) Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? J Med Genet 37: 197-202
3. Baker R (1991) The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with their general practice. Fam Pract 8: 171-177
4. Bowling A, Stramer K, Dickinson E, Windsor J, Bond M (1997) Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists and general practitioners. J Epidemiol Comm Health 51: 52-61
5. Campbell H, Holloway S, Cetnarskyj R, Anderson E, Rush R, Fry A, Gorman D, Steel M, Porteous M (2003) Referrals of women with a family history of breast cancer from primary care to cancer genetics services in SE Scotland. Br J Cancer 89: 1650-1656
6. Campbell H, MacKay J, Porteous M (1995) The future of breast and ovarian cancer genetics clinics. BMJ 311: 1584-1585
7. Cancer Research Campaign (1997) Cancer Genetic (a public information leaflet)
8. Cull A, Miller H, Porterfield T, Mackay J, Anderson EDC, Steel CM, Elton RA (1998) The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomised evaluation study. Br J Cancer 77: 830-837
9. Donnai D, Kerzin-Storrar L, Craufurd D, Evans G, Clayton-Smith J, Kingston H (2000) Tensions in implementing the new genetics. Genetic counsellors could be based in genetic centres but be formally linked to general practice. BMJ 321: 241
10. Evans DG, Blair V, Hopwood P, Howell A (1994) The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 70: 934-938
11. Fry A, Cull A, Appleton S, Rush R, Holloway S, Gorman D, Cetnarskyj R, Thomas R, Campbell J, Anderson E, Steel M, Porteous M, Campbell H (2003) A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact: Br J Cancer 89: 653-659
12. Garvican L, Grimsey E, Littlejohns P, Lowndes S, Sacks N (1998) Satisfaction with clinical nurse specialists in a breast care clinic: questionnaire survey. BMJ 316: 976-978
13. Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson
14. Grande GE, Hyland F, Walter FM, Kinmonth AL (2002) Women's views of consultations about familial risk of breast cancer in primary care. Patient Educ Couns 48: 275-282
15. Hallowell N, Murton F, Statham H, Green JM, Richards MPM (1997) Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview and observational study. BMJ 314: 281-283
16. Hopwood P, Keeling F, Long A, Pool C, Evans DGR, Howell A (1998) Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators. Psycho-oncology 7: 402-412
17. Kincey J, Bradshaw P, Ley P (1975) Patient's satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 25: 558-566
18. Meakin R, Weinmann J (2002) The 'Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale' (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Fam Pract 19: 257-263
19. Pocock SJ (1983) Clinical Trials - A Practical Approach, pp 84-86 Chichester: Wiley
20. Steel M, Smyth E, Vasen H, Eccles D, Evans G, Møller P, Hodgson S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Chang-Claude J, Caligo M, Morrison P, Haites N. (1999) Ethical, social and economic issues in familial breast cancer: a compilation of views from the E.C. Biomed II Demonstration Project. Disease Markers 15: 125-131
21. Shiloh S, Avdor O, Goodman RM. (1990) Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement. Am J Med Genet 37: 522-529
22. Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade Walsh M, Ashley S, Davidson J, Papaikonomou M, Murday V, Sacks N, Eeles R (1998) Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? J Med Genet 35: 731-738
23. Wolf MH, Putnam SM, James SA, Stiles WB (1978) The medical interview satisfaction scale: development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behaviour. J Behav Med 1: 391-401
24. Wonderling D, Hopwood P, Cull A, Douglas F, Watson M, Burn J, McPherson K (2001) A descriptive study of UK cancer genetics services: an emerging clinical response to the new genetics. Br J Cancer 85: 166-170