Is vicryl closure of uterotomy in cesarean section an impact on wound healing?;Utječu li materijal i tehnika šivanja na cijeljenje uterotomije pri carskome rezu?

Lijecnicki Vjesnik

Volumn 125, Issue 9-10, 2003, Pages 245-251

  Šestanović, Željan ^a,b   Mimica, Marko ^a   Vulić, Marko ^a   Roje, Damir ^a   Tomić, Snježana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SPLIT   (Croatia)

^b Odjel Patologiju Citologiju KB Split ^*  (Croatia)

Author keywords

Cesarean section methods; Suture techniques; Uterine rupture; Vaginal birth after cesarean section

Indexed keywords

POLYGLACTIN; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; SUTURE MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; CATGUT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROATIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; SUTURING METHOD; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND HEALING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PREGNANCY; SUTURE; UTERUS;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; UTERUS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 1542329082     PISSN: 00243477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Frković A. Carski rez - restrikcija ili liberalni pristup. XIX. perinatalni dani. Zagreb 2002;100-2.
2. st ed. McGraw-Hill. New York 2001, str. 537.
3. Dražančić A. Carski rez u Hrvatskoj. XIX. perinatalni dani. Zagreb 2002; 103-11.
4. Banović I, Vulić M, Banović V, Tadin I, Roje D, Vulić R. Carski rez i perinatalni mortalitet. XIX. perinatalni dani. Zagreb 2002;120-3.
5. Zuidema L, Elderkin R, Cook C, Jelsema R. Is Vicryl suture of uterine wounds associated with more dehiscence? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174-357.
6. cross D signelmiš J, Barišić D, Strelec M. Manualna eksploracija materišta poslije vaginalnog poro cross d signaja u žena s prethodnim carskim rezom. Med An 1996; 16:181-4.
7. Salamon S. Jednoslojno ekstraendometrijalno šivanje stijenke uterusa kod carskog reza (Disertacija). Sarajevo: Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Sarajevu; 1976. str. 1-119.
8. Šestanović Ž. Primjena jednorednog pojedinačnog šava kod transperitonealnog istmičnog poprečnog carskog reza (Disertacija). Zagreb: Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu; 1990, str. 1-256.
9. Šestanovič Ž, Boschi S, Tomić S. Cervikohisterografija u procjeni ožiljka uterusa nakon carskog reza. Gynaecol Perinatol 1999;133-9.
10. Šestanovič Ž, Banović I, Tadin I, Bakotin J, Tomić S. Histološka procjena valjanosti ožiljka uterusa nakon carskog reza. Gynaecol Perinatol 2000;9: 125-31.
11. Šestanović Ž, Mimica M, Banović I i sur. Ultrazvuk u procjeni ožiljka uterusa nakon carskog reza. Gynaecol Perinatol 2001;10(4):161-7.
12. Petrikovsky BM. Endoscopic assessment of the integrity of the postcesarean uterine wall before a trial a labor. Transcervical endoscopy registry. J Reprod Med 1994;39:464-6.
13. Šimić S. Endoskopske metode u ginekologiji i perinatologiji. U: Kurjak A i sur, ur. Ginekologija i perinatologija I. Varaždinske Toplice: Golden time; 1995; str. 601-630.
14. Hebisch G, Kirkinen P, Haldemann R, Pako E, Husch R. Vergleichende Uterussuchung am unteren Uterinsegment nach Sectio cesarea mittels Ultraschall und Magnetresonanztomographie. Ultraschall in Med 1994; 15:112-4.
15. Dickle O, Kucukler C, Pirnar T, Erata Y, Posaci C. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections. Eur Radiol 1997;7:31-4.
16. Tahilramaney MP, Bouscher M, Eglington GS, Beall M, Phelan JP. Previous Cesarean Section and Trial of labor. J Reprod Med 1984;29:17-21.
17. Colla F, Colla G, Alba E, Grio R. Considerazioni attuali sul;' assistenza al parto delle donne con progresso taglio cesareo. Minerva Ginecologica 2001;53(1):21-7.
18. el-Mansouri A. Delivery in the presence of cicatricial uterus. Apropos of 150 cases. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1994;89(12):606-12.
19. Blanchette H, Blanchette I, McCabe J, Vincent S. Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(7):1478-84.
20. Raynor BD. The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in same rural community practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:60-2.
21. Ralph G, Wessel J, Lichtenegger W, Schorer P. Geburtsleitung bei Zustand nach Kaiserschnitt. Z Geburtsh u Perinat 1989;193:188-92.
22. Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA. Failed vaginal birth after cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(7):1361-71.
23. Khan KS, Rizvi A. The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;50(2):151-7.
24. Cosson M, Dufour P, Nayama M, Vinatier D, Monnier JC. Obstetricial prognosis of the post-cesarean uterus. 641 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod Paris 1995;24(4):434-9.
25. Neuhaus W, Bauerschmitz G, Gohring U, Schmidt T, Bolete A. Das Risiko der Uterusruptur nach vorausgegangenem Kaiserschnitt eine Analyse von 1086 Geburten. Zentralblatt fur Gynäkologie 2001;123(3):148-52.
26. Kolben M. Geburtshilfliche Aspekte bei Zustand nach Sectio caesarea. Geburtsh. u. Frauenheilk 1993;53:829-34.
27. Plotz EJ. Geburtsleitung nach vorausgegangenem Kaiserschnitt. Gynäkologe 1974;7:116-21.
28. Plotz EJ. Vaginale Entbindung nach vorausgegangenem Kaiserschnitt. Gynäkologe 1986;19:1-2.
29. Rosenzweig E, Bačić M, Stoiljković Č. Radanje nakon prethodno izvršenog carskog reza. Rad Med Fak Zagreb 1962;10:223-39.
30. Rosenzweig E, Bačić M. Stoiljković Č. Ruptura uterusa na ožiljku iza carskog reza. Rad Med Fak Zagreb 1964;12:51-69.
31. Flamm BL, Lim OW, Jones C, Fallon D, Newman LA, Mantis K. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1079-84.
32. Delarue T, Pele P. Prevention de ruptures et preruptures des uterus anterieurement cesarises. J Gyn Obst Biol Repr 1981;10:259-67.
33. Wesswel J, Ralph G, Lichtenegger W, Schorer P Spezielle geburtshilfliche Probleme der Geburtsleitung bei Zustand nach Sectio. Z Geburtsh u Perinat 1989;193:134-8.
34. Dražančić A, Orešković S. Prevencija infekcija kod carskog reza. Gynaecol Perinatol 1994;3(suppl1):83-7.
35. Dražančić A. Osjetljivost miometrija i sazrijevanje cerviksa uterusa u trudnoći. Gynaecol Perinatol 2001;10(1):21-9.
36. cross Dsignelmiś J, Bojanić D. Porocrooss d signdaj nakon prethodnog carskog reza. Jugoslav ginekol perinatol 1986;26(3-4):73-7.
37. Meehan FP, Nagani IM. Rue rupture of the Caesarean section scar (a 15 year review, 1972-1978). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989;30: 129-35.
38. Phelan JP, Ock Ahn M, Diaz F, Brar HS, Rodriges MH. Once a Cesarean, Always a Cesarean? Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:161-5.
39. Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D, Srong TH, Medearis AL. Uterine rupture during trial a labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:996-1001.
40. Beckleay S, Gee H, Newton JR. Scar rupture in labour after previous lower uterine segment section: the role of uterine activity measurement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;88:265-9.
41. Haddad S, Maria B. L'accouchement des femmes ayant un uterus cicatriciel. Presse Med 1996;25(17):813-7.
42. Guzman-Sanches A, Alfaro-Alfaro N, Perez-Garcia JF, Martin de Alba A. Trying vaginal delivery in 1000 patients with previous cesarean section in the Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1998; 66:325-9.
43. Rayburn WF, Gittens LN, Lucas MJ, Gall SA, Martin ME. Weekly administration of prostaglandin E2 gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareans. Prepidl Gel Study Group. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94(2):250-4.
44. Choy-Hee L, Raynor BD. Misoprostol induction of labor among women with a history of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(6): 1115-7.
45. Goetzl L, Shipp TD, Cohen A, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Liberman E. Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(3).
46. Finley BE, Gibbs CE. Emergent cesarean delivery in patients undergoing a trial of labor with transverse lower-segment scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:936-9.
47. Eden RD, Parker RT, Gall SA. Rupture of the pregnant uterus: A 53-Year Review. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:671-74.
48. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstretic and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(3):332-7.
49. Raskin KS, Dachauer AL, Rayburn WF. Uterine rupture after use a prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert during vaginal birth after cesarean. A report of two cases. J Repr Med 1999;44(6):571-4.
50. Hill DA, Chez RA, Quinlan J, Fuentes A, LaCombe J. Uterine rupture and dehiscence associated with intravaginal misoprostol cervical ripening. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2000;45(10):823-6.
51. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Trial of labor 40 weeks gestation in women with prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97 (3):391-3.
52. Sims EJ, Newman RB, Hulsey TC. Vaginal birth after cesarean: to induce or not to induce. Am Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(6)1122-4.
53. Aboulfalah A, Abbassi H, El Karroumi E et al. Accouchement du gross bebe sur uterus cicatricial: la place de l'eprevue uterine. J Gyn Obs Biol Repr 2000;29(4):409-13.
54. Nguyen TV, Dinth TV, Suresh MS, Kinch RAH, Anderson GD. Vaginal Birth After cesarean section at the University of Texas. J Reprod Med 1992;37(10):880-2.
55. Leung AS, Farmer RM, Leung EK, Medearis AL, Paul RH. Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor cesarean delivery: A case-control study. Am J Obs Gyn 1993;168:1358-63.
56. Diaz SD, Jons JE, Seryakov M, Mann WJ. Uterine rupture and dehsicence: ten-year review and case-control study. South Med J 2002;95(4): 431-5.
57. Kaser O, Ikle FA, Hirsch HA. Atlas der gynäkologischen Operationen. 4. izd. Stuttgart: Thieme 1983;8.1.
58. Martius G, Frank HD, Schachinger H, Spann W. Geburtshilflichperinatologische Operationen. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1986:196.
59. Myerscough PR. Munro Kerr's Operative Obstetrics. 10. izd. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1982:295.
60. Phelan JP, Clark SL. Caesarean delivery. The transperitoneal Approach. U: Phellan JP, Clark ur. Cesarean Delivery. New York: Elsevier. 1988;201-18.
61. Greenhil JP, Friedman EA. Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstretics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1974:787.
62. Kamina P. Anatomical Bases of Inferior Segment Cesarean Sections. Anatomica Clinica 1978;1:199-203.
63. Koppel E, Strzyk B, Zbieszck J. Kaiserschnitt mit Anwendung einschictiger transistmicher Uterusnaht. Zbl Gynekol 1983;105:1522-5.
64. Racinet C, Favier M. La cesarienne. Paris: Masson, 1984:63.
65. Nocherman PF. Die chirurgische Naht. 4. izd. Stuttgart-New York: Georg Thieme Verlag 1992;1-246.
66. Klug W, Mayer HG, Hohlweg Th. Die Bedeutung der Operationstechnik bei der Verhutung infektiöser Komplikationen nach Kaiserschnitt. Zbl Gynäkol 1986;108:1046-52.
67. Hillemanns HG. Zur Operationstechnik der Schnittentbindung. Geburtsh u Frauenheilk 1987;47:117-20.
68. Tischendorf D. Die einschichtige Uterusnaht bei Sectio caesarea. Geburtsh u Frauenheilk 1987;47:117-20.
69. Iankov M. Single-layer or double layer suturing of the uterine incision in cesarean section? Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia. 1999;38(3):10-3.
70. Mema KR, Johanson R. Techniques for performing caesarean section. Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001;15(1): 17-47.
71. Jelsema RD, Wittingen JA, Vander Kolk KJ. Continuous, Nonlocking, Single-Layer repair of the Low Transverse Uterine Incision. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:393-6.
72. Holmgren G, Sjoholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1999;78(7):615-21.
73. Zienkowicz Z, Suchocki S, Slebeda H, Bojarski M. Cesarean section by the Misgav Ladach with the abdominal opening surgery by the Joel Cohen method. Ginekologia polska 2000;71(4):284-7.
74. Ferrari AG, Frigerio L, Candotti G et al. Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity? International Journal of Gynaecology Obstretrics 2001;72(2):135-43.
75. Šimić S. Operativna tehnika carskog reza. U: Bregun-Dragić N, ur. Carski rez. Novi Sad: Medicinski fakultet, 1987:17-30.
76. Lyon JB, Richardson AC. Careful surgical technique can reduce infectious morbidity after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:557-2.
77. Howkins J, Hudson CN. Shaw's textbook of operative gynecology. 4. izd. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 1977:135.
78. Burchel CR. Cesarean section. U: Iffy Lc, ur. Operative perinatology. New York: Macmillan, 1994;706-29.
79. Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO. Transverse uterine incision closure: One versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1108-11.
80. Rayburn WF, Schwartz WJ. Refinements in performing a cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996;51(7):445-51.
81. Pschyrembel W, Dudenhasen JW. Praktische Geburtshilfe 16. Auflage Walter de Gruyter. Berlin-New York 1989;469-479.
82. Martens MG. Reduction of infectious morbidity with uterine stapling device. Advances in Therapy 1990;7(2):105-8.
83. Khanam RA, Khatun M. Ruptured uterus: an ongoing tragedy of motherhood. Bangladesh Med res Counc Bull 2001;27(2):43-7.