Words that Heal

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 140, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 482-483

  Frenkel, Douglas N ^a   Liebman, Carol B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b The Earth Institute at Columbia University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICATION ERROR; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW;

EID: 1542328160     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-6-200403160-00016     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Mazor KM, Simon SR, Yood RA, Martinson BC, Gunter MJ, Reed GW, et al. Health plan members' views about disclosure of medical errors. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:409-18.
2. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277:553-9. [PMID: 9032162]
3. Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (Mcare) Act. 13 Pa C S §308 (2002).
4. Nev Rev Stat §439.835 (2003).
5. Fla Stat §395.1051 (2003).
6. Robbennolt JK. Apologies and legal settlement: an empirical examination. The Michigan Law Review. [In press].
7. Cohen JR. Apology and organizations: exploring an example from medical practice. Fordham Urban Law Journal. 2000;27:1447-82.
8. Tire victim: apology seemed sincere. Accessed at www.cbsnews.com/stories /2000/12/20/national/main258587.shtml on 25 January 2004.
9. Mass Gen Laws ch 233, §23D.
10. V.T.C.A Civ Prac & Rem Code §18.061.
11. Fla Stat §90.4026.
12. Cohen JR. Legislating apology: the pros and cons. University of Cincinnati Law Review. 2002;70:819-72.
13. Allred KG. Anger and retaliation in conflict: the role of attribution. In: Deutsch M, Coleman PT, eds. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000:236-55.