Graph Construction and Analysis as a Paradigm for Plan Recognition

Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 774-779

  Hong, Jun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

GRAPH ANALYSIS; GRAPH CONSTRUCTION; GRAPH STRUCTURES; PLAN RECOGNITION; POLYNOMIAL SPACE; POLYNOMIAL-TIME; TIME STEP; TIME-SPACE; TWO DOMAINS; VALID PLAN;

POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION;

EID: 1542322096     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Allen, J., and Perrault, C. 1980. Analysing intention in utterances. ArtificialIntelligence15:143-178.
2. Anderson, C.; Smith, D.; and Weld, D. 1998. Conditional effects in graphplan. In Proc. of 4th Intl. Conf. AI Planning Systems.
3. Bauer, M. 1998. Acquisition of abstract plan descriptions for plan recognition. In Proceedings of AAAI-98, 936-941.
4. Blum, A., and Furst, M. 1995. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. In Proc. of IJCAI-95, 1636-1642.
5. Blum, A., and Furst, M. 1997. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90:281-300.
6. Carberry, S. 1986. User models: the problem of disparity. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 29-34.
7. Gazen, B., and Knoblock, C. 1997. Combining the ex-pressivity of ucpop with the efficiency of graphplan. In Proc. 4th Euro. Conf. on Planning.
8. Kautz, H. 1987. A Formal Theory of Plan Recognition. PhD Thesis, University of Rochester.
9. Koehler, J.; Nebel, B.; Hoffmann, J.; and Dimopoulos, Y. 1997. Extending planing graphs to an adl subset. In Proc. of 4th Euro. Conf. on Planning, 273-285.
10. Lesh, N., and Etzioni, O. 1995. A sound and fast goal recognizer. In Proc. 15th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, 1704-1710.
11. Lesh, N., and Etzioni, O. 1996. Scaling up goal recognition. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.
12. Litman, D., and Allen, J. 1987. A plan recognition model for sub-dialogues in conversation. Cognitive Science 11:163-200.
13. Pednault, E. 1988. Synthesizing plans that contain actions with context-dependent effects. ComputationalIntelligence 4(4):356-372.
14. Pednault, E. 1989. Adl: Exploring the middle ground between strips and the situation calculus. In Proc. of KR-89, 324-332. Morgan Kaufman.
15. Pollack, M. 1986. A model of plan inference that distinguishes between the beliefs of actors and observers. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational linguistics, 207-214.