TiNA: A Scheme for Temporal Coherency-Aware in-Network Aggregation

Proceedings of the Third ACM International Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access: MobiDE 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 69-76

  Sharaf, Mohamed A ^a   Beaver, Jonathan ^a   Labrinidis, Alexandros ^a   Chrysanthis, Panos K ^a  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

Author keywords

Power aware In network Aggregation; Sensor Network

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; MOBILE COMPUTING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; QUERY LANGUAGES; ROUTERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSOR DATA FUSION; SYNCHRONIZATION; SYNTACTICS; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

IN-NETWORK AGGREGATION; QUALITY OF DATA (QOD); SENSOR NETWORKS;

DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 1542317588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. P. Deolasse, A. Katkar, A. Panchbudhe, K. Ramamritham, and P. Shenoy. Adaptive push-pull: Disseminating dynamic web data. In Proc. of WWW, pages 265-274, 2001.
2. S. Goel and T. Imielinski. Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: Taking lessons from MPEG. Computer Comm. Review, 31(5), Oct. 2001.
3. J. Heidemann, F. Silva, C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, and D. Ganesan. Building efficient wireless sensor networks with low-level naming. In Proc. of SOSP, Oct. 2001.
4. J. Hill and D. Culler. Mica: A wireless platform for deeply embedded networks. IEEE Micro., 22(6), 2002.
5. C. Intanagonwiwat et al. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proc. of MobiCom, Aug. 2000.
6. P. Juang et al. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet. In Proc. of ASPLOS, Oct. 2002.
7. C. Lin, C. Federspiel, and D. Auslander. Multi-sensor single actuator control of HVAC, 2002.
8. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TAG: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proc. of OSDI, Dec. 2002.
9. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. The design of an acquisitional query processor for sensor networks. In Proc. of SIGMOD, June 2003.
10. A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, and J. Anderson. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Proc. of WSNA, Sep. 2002.
11. A. Manjeshwar and D. P. Agrawal. APTEEN: A hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of IPDPS, 2002.
12. C. Perkins. Ad-hoc on demand distance vector routing (AODV). Internet-draft, Nov. 1997.
13. S.Acharya, P. B. Gibbons, and V. Poosala. Congressional samples for approximate answering of group-by queries. In Proc. of SIGMOD, May 2000.
14. H. Schwetman. CSIM user's guide. MCC Corporation.
15. S. Singh and C. Raghavendra. PAMAS: Power aware multi-access protocol with signalling for ad hoc networks. Computer Comm. Review, 28(3), July 1998.
16. Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. Query processing for sensor networks. In Proc. of CIDR, Jan. 2003.