Research on the value of medical library services: Does it make an impact in the health care literature?

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 34-45

  Sherwill Navarro, Pamela J ^a,b   Wallace, Addajane L ^c  

^a Tobacco Policy Research Program   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c HALIFAX MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIBRARY; MEDICAL LIBRARY SERVICE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY SERVICES; MEDLINE; PERIODICALS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 1542316902     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. KING DN. The contribution of hospital library information services to clinical care: a study in eight hospitals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1987 Oct;75(4):291-30.
2. GARFIELD E. The multiple meanings of impact factors. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1998;49(8):768. [cited 16 Oct 2003]. « http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/multiple_meanings-impfactor. html».
3. KUHLEMEIER KV. A bibliometric analysis of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992 Feb;73(2):126-32.
4. NEALE V. Publication productivity ranking questioned. Fam Med 1994 Oct;26(9):550.
5. KRUMLAND RB, WILL EE, GORRY GA. Scientific publications of a medical school faculty. J Med Educ 1979 Nov; 54(11):876-84.
6. GARFIELD E. How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant? Part 1. Current Contents 1983 Oct 31;(44):354-362. [cited 16 Oct 2003]. « http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v6p354y1983.pdf».
7. GARFIELD E. How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant? Part 2. Current Contents 1983 Nov 7;(45):363-72. [cited 16 Oct 2003]. « http://www.garfield.library.upenn.gedu/essays/v6p363y1983.pdf».
8. KUHLEMEIER, op. cit., 132.
9. GARFIELD, Part 2., op. cit., 363.
10. ZACHERT MJ. Educational services in health sciences libraries: an analysis of the periodical literature, 1975-1986. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1987 Jul;75(3):234-8.
11. BAYERS N. Personal communication, Research Services Group, ISL
12. PALMER RA. The hospital library is crucial to quality healthcare. Hosp Top 1991 Summer;69(3):20-5.
13. URQUHART CJ, HEPWORTH JB. Comparing and using assessments of the value of information to clinical decision-making. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1996 Oct; 84(4):482-9.
14. HOMAN JM. A snapshot in time: citation rankings of the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000 Jan;88(1):83.
15. GARFIELD E. How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):411-3.