The validity and reliability of EQ-5D health state valuations in a survey of Māori

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 271-274

  Perkins, M R V ^a   Devlin, N J ^b   Hansen, P ^c  

^a Pharmaceutical Management Agency   (New Zealand)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Health related quality of life; M ori; New Zealand; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LOGIC; MAORI; MENTAL HEALTH; NEW ZEALAND; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; RELIGION; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CULTURE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; OCEANIC ANCESTRY GROUP; QUALITY OF LIFE; STUDENTS;

EID: 1542315431     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015300.28109.38     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Health Funding Authority. How shall we Prioritise Health and Disability Services? Wellington, New Zealand, 1998.
2. PHARMAC. A Prescription for Pharmacoeconomic Analysis. Wellington, New Zealand, 1999.
3. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, et al. For the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, recommendation of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996; 276(8): 1253-1258.
4. Ashton T, Cumming J, Devlin NJ. Prioritising Health and Disability Support Services: Principles, Processes and Problems. Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee, 1999.
5. Statistics New Zealand. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity. Available from http://www.stats.govt.nz.
6. Durie M. Whairoa - Māori Health Development. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1998.
7. Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Herbison P. Variations in self-reported health status: Results from a New Zealand survey. NZ Med J 2000; 1123: 517-520.
8. Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling. Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Method Res 1981; 10(2): 141-163.
9. Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Kind P, Williams A. Logical inconsistencies in survey respondents' health state valuations -a methodological challenge for estimating social tariffs. Health Econ (in press).
10. Kind P, Gudex C, Dolan P, Williams A. Practical and methodological issues in the development of the EuroQol. The York experience. Adv Medic Socio 1994; 5: 219-253.
11. Brooks R. For the EuroQol Group. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72.
12. Statistics New Zealand. 1996 Census of Population and Dwellings - Māori. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington, 1997.
13. Dolan P, Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42(4): 609-615.
14. Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 943-950.
15. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The Measurement and Valuation of Health. First Report on the Main Survey. The MVH Group. Centre for Health Economics, The University of York, 1994.
16. Statistics New Zealand. Literacy Skills. Available from http://www.stats.govt.nz.