Professional Identities and Interprofessional Relations: Evaluation of Collaborative Community Schemes

Social Work in Health Care

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 51-72

  King, Nigel ^a   Ross, Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaborative working; Community nursing; Professional identities; Roles; Social work

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; NURSING; PATIENT CARE; PHENOMENOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SOCIAL WORKER; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NURSES; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SOCIAL WORK; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 1542313868     PISSN: 00981389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J010v38n02_03     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Biggs, S. (1993). User participation and interprofessional collaboration in community care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 7, 151-159.
2. Biggs, S. (1997). Interprofessional collaboration: Problems and prospects. In J. Ovretveit. P. Mathias & T. Thompson (Eds.), Interprofessional working for health and social care (pp. 186-200). London: Macmillan.
3. Brown, R.B. & McCartney S. (2000). Professionalism definitions in 'managing' health services: perspectives on the differing views of clinicians and general mangers in an NHS Trust. In E. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace (pp. 178-194). London: Routledge.
4. Burch, S., & Borland, C. (2001). Collaboration, facilities and communities in day care services for older people. Health and Social Cáre in the Community, 9, 19-30.
5. Butt, T. (1996). PCP: Cognitive or social psychology? In J.W. Scheer & A. Catina (Eds.), Empirical constructivism in Europe, The Personal Construct approach (pp. 58-64), Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
6. Crabtree, B.F. & Miller, W.L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In B.F. Crabtree & W.L. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edition (pp. 163-177). Newbury Park, California: Sage.
7. Cumella, S., Le Mesurier, N., & Tomlin, H. (1996). Social work in practice. Worcester: The Martley Press.
8. Department of Health. (1989). Caring for people: Community care in the next decade and beyond. London: H.M.S.O.
9. Department of Health. (1997). The new NHS: Modern, dependable. London: H.M.S.O.
10. Fournier, V. (2000). Boundary work and the (un) making of the professions. In E. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace (pp. 67-86). London: Routledge.
11. Gelman, S.B., White, A.W., Carlson, L., & Norman, L. (2000). Making organizational change to achieve improvement and interprofessional learning: Perspectives from health professions educators. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14, 131-146.
12. Gilbert, J.H.V., Camp II, R.D., Cole, C.D., Bruce, C., Fielding, D. W., & Stanton, S. J. (2000). Preparing students for interprofessional team work in health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14, 223-235.
13. Griffiths, R. (1988). Community care: Agenda for action. London: H.M.S.O.
14. Hudson, B. (1998). Prospects of partnership. Health Service Journal, 16 April, 26-27.
15. Hudson, B. (1999). Primary health and social care: Working across the boundaries. Part two: Models of interprofessional collaboration. Managing Community Care, 7, 15-19.
16. Kelly, G.A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
17. King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (pp. 118-134). London: Sage.
18. King, N. & Anderson, N.R. (1992). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations. London: Thomson.
19. Kraus, W. A. (1980). Collaboration in organisations: Alternatives to hierarchy. London: Human Science Press.
20. Leathard, A. (1994). Inter-professional developments in Britain: An overview. In A. Leathard (Ed.), Going inter-professional: Working together for health and welfare (pp. 3-37). London: Routledge.
21. May, T. & Buck, M. (2000). The rationality of organizational change. In E. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace (pp. 178-194). London: Routledge.
22. Morgan, D.L. & Krueger, A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D.L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3-19). London: Sage.
23. Pietroni, P. & Pietroni, C. (1996). Innovations in community health and primary care - the Marylebone experiment. London: Churchill Livingstone.
24. Poulton, B. & West, M. (1993). Effective multidisciplinary teamwork in primary healthcare. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 918-925.
25. Poxton, R. (1999). Partnerships in primary and social care: Integrating services for vulnerable people. London: Kings Fund Publishing.
26. Rummery, K., & Glendinning, C. (1997). Working Together. Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre.
27. Stake, R. (1994). The art of case-study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Stephan, W.G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, (Vol. 9, pp. 13-40). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. UKCC (United Kingdom Central Council) for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. (1996). Guidelines for professional practice. London: The Council.