Comprehension of sentences with stylistic inversion by French aphasic patients

Brain and Language

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 142-156

  Rigalleau, François ^a,b   Baudiffier, Vanessa ^a   Caplan, David ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMNESIA; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONDUCTION APHASIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; SPEECH DISORDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APHASIA, BROCA; APHASIA, CONDUCTION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 1542298947     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00334-1     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bates E., Friederici A., Wulfeck B. Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language. 32:1987;19-67.
2. Belleti A. The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry. 19:1988;1-34.
3. Beretta A., Harford C., Patterson J., Piñango M. The derivation of post-verbal subjects: Evidence from agrammatic aphasia. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 14:1996;725-748.
4. Beretta A., Piñango M., Patterson J., Harford C. Recruiting comparative crosslinguistic evidence to address competing accounts of agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language. 67:1999;149-168.
5. Beretta A. Linear and structural accounts of theta-role assignment in agrammatic aphasia. Aphasiology. 15:2001;515-531.
6. Berndt R.S. Sentence comprehension in Broca's aphasia: A critique of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;24.
7. Berndt R.S., Caramazza A. A redifinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language. Applied Psycholinguistics. 1:1980;225-278.
8. Caplan D. Syntactic and semantic structures in agrammatism. Kean M.-L. Agrammatism. 1985;125-152 Academic Press, New York.
9. Caplan D. Issues arising in contemporary studies of disorders of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension in agrammatic patients. Brain and Language. 50:1995;325-338.
10. Caplan D. Lesion location and aphasic syndrome do not tell us whether a patient will have an isolated deficit affecting the co-indexation of traces. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;25-27.
11. Caplan D. The measurement of chance performance in aphasia, with specific reference to the comprehension of semantically reversible passive sentences: A note on issues raised by Caramazza, Rey, and Berndt (2001) and Drai, Grodzinsky, and Zurif (2001). Brain and Language. 76:2001;193-201.
12. Caplan D. Points regarding the functional neuroanatomy of syntactic processing: A response to Zurif (2001). Brain and Language. 79:2001;329-332.
13. Caplan D., Hildebrandt N. Disorders of syntactic comprehension. 1988;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Caplan D., Waters G. Short-term memory and language comprehension: A critical review of the neuropsychological litterature. Vallar G., Shallice T. Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory. 1990;337-389 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
15. Caplan D., Waters G. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22:1999;77-126.
16. Caramazza A., Berndt R.S., Basili A.G., Koller J.J. Syntactic processing deficits in aphasia. Cortex. 17:1981;333-348.
17. Caramazza A., Zurif E. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language. 3:1976;572-582.
18. Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. 1981;Foris, Dordrecht.
19. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. Psyscope: An integrative graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research: Methods, Instruments and Computers. 25:1993;257-271.
20. Deprez V. Stylistic inversion and verb movement. Powers J., de Jong K. Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. 1988;71-82 Ohio State University, Columbus.
21. Drai D., Grodzinksy Y. Comprehension regularity in Broca's aphasia? There's more of it than you ever imagined. Brain and Language. 70:1999;139-140.
22. Drai D., Grodzinsky Y., Zurif E. Agrammatic Broca's Aphasia is Associated with a Single Pattern of Comprehension Performance. Brain and Language. 76:2001;185-192.
23. Friedemann M.-A. Inversion stylistique et position de base du sujet. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 42:1997;379-413.
24. Friederici A. Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. Cognition. 19:1985;133-166.
25. Friederici A. Agrammatic comprehension: Picture of a computational mismatch. Aphasiology. 2:1988;279-284.
26. Friederici A.D., Kilborn K.W. Temporal constraints on language processing: Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1:1989;262-272.
27. Frisch S., Saddy D., Friederici A. Cutting a long story (too) short. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;34-35.
28. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition. 68:1998;1-76.
29. Grodzinsky Y. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 50:1995;27-51.
30. Grodzinsky Y. The neurology of yntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;1-21.
31. Grodzinsky Y. The trace deletion hypothesis and the tree-prunning hypothesis: Still valid characterizations of Broca's aphasia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;55-64.
32. Grodzinsky Y., Piñango M.M., Zurif E., Drai D. The Critical Role of Group Studies in Neuropsychology: Comprehension Regularities in Broca's Aphasia. Brain and Language. 67:1999;134-147.
33. Hagiwara H., Caplan D. Syntactic comprehension in Japanese aphasics: Effects of category and thematic role order. Brain and Language. 38:1990;159-170.
34. Hedberg N. The referential status of clefts. Language. 76:2000;891-920.
35. Kayne R. Subject inversion in French interrogatives. Casagrande J., Saciuk B. Generative studies in Romance Languages. 1972;70-126 Newbury House, Rowley, Massachusetts.
36. Kayne R. The antisymmetry of syntax. 1994;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Kayne R., Pollock J.-Y. Stylistic inversion, successive cyclicity, and move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry. 9:1978;595-621.
38. Kayne R., Pollock J.-Y. New thoughts on stylistic inversion. Hulk A., Pollock J.-Y. Subject Inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. 2001;107-162 Oxford University Press, New York.
39. Koopman H., Sportiche D. The position of subjects. Lingua. 85:1988;211-258.
40. Lasnik H. Syntactic structures revisited. 2000;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Mauner G., Fromkin V.A., Cornell T.L. Comprehension and acceptability judgements in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language. 45:1993;340-370.
42. Mazaux J.M., Orgogozo J.M. Adaptation française du Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination de H. Goodglass et E. Kaplan. 1982;Editions Scientifiques et Psychologiques, Paris.
43. Miceli G., Mazzuchi A., Menn L., Goodglass H. Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language. 19:1983;65-97.
44. Nespoulous J.-L., Dordain M., Perron C., Ska B., Bub D., Caplan D., Mehler J., Lecours A.R. Agrammatism in sentence production without comprehension deficits: Reduced availability of syntactic structures and/or of grammatical morphemes? Brain and Language. 33:1988;273-295.
45. Nespoulous, J. -L., Lecours, A., Lafond, F., Lemay, A., Puel, M., Joanette, Y., Cot, F., & Rascol, A. (1986). Protocole Montréal- Toulouse d'examen linguistique de l'aphasie MT86. L'ortho Edition, Isebergues.
46. Pollack L., Norman D.A. A non parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Sciences. 1:1964;125-126.
47. Pollock J.-Y. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry. 20:1989;365-424.
48. Rigalleau, F., Caplan, D. (in press). Deficit of the automatic pronominal co-indexation in aphasic patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics.
49. Siegel S., Castellan N.J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 1988;McGraw Hill, New York.
50. Taraldsen K.T. Subject extraction, the distribution of expletives, and stylistic inversion. Hulk A., Pollock J.-Y. Subject Inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. 2001;163-182 Oxford University Press, New York.
51. Valois D., Dupuis F. On the status of (verbal) traces in French: the case of stylistic inversion. Hirschbühler P., Koerner K. Romance languages and modern linguistic theory. 1992;325-338 John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
52. Zurif E., Piñango M.M. The existence of comprehension patterns in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language. 70:1999;133-138.