Non-trade concerns in WTO trade negotiations: Legal and legitimate reasons for revising the 'box' system

International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology

Volumn 2, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 399-410

  Simpson, James R ^a,c,d,e   Schoenbaum, Thomas J ^b,f,g  

^a RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d CG Syst of Intl Research Centers ^*

^e WORLD BANK   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agreement on agriculture; Agriculture; Development box; Doha; Doha Agenda; Food; Food security; Human rights; Human rights covenants; Non trade concerns; NTCs; Security box; UN; United Nations; World Trade Organization; WTO

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TRADE; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; TRADE RELATIONS; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

EID: 1542289012     PISSN: 14624605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
2. Blandford, D. and Boisvert, R.N. (2002) 'Multifunctional agriculture and domestic/international policy choice', The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.106-118.
3. Blandford, D. and Boisvert, R.N. (2002) 'Non-trade concerns and domestic/international policy choice', IATRC Working Paper 02-1, January. Available online at http://www.iatrcweb.org
4. Landbruksdepartmentementet, Ministry of Agriculture, Norway (2000) Proceedings, International Conference on Non-Trade Concerns in Agriculture, Ullensvang, Norway, 2-4 July 2000. Available online http://odin.dep.no/ld/mf/ Conferences/020061-990057/index-dok000-b-n-a.html
5. Latacz-Lohmann, U. and Hodge, I. (2001) '"Multifunctionality" and "free trade": conflict or harmony?', EuroChoices, Spring, pp.42-46.
6. Paarlberg, P.L., Bredahl, M. and Lee, J.G. (2002) 'Implications of multifunctionality for developing nations,' paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium analytical symposium The Developing Countries, Agricultural Trade, and the WTO, June 16-17, 2002, Whistler, BC, Canada.
7. Sakuyama, T. (2003) 'Multifunctionality of agriculture in comparative perspective: priorities and policy instruments in developed world', Journal of Rural Planning Association, Vol. 22, No. 1, forthcoming.
8. Swinbank, A. (2001) 'Multifunctionality: a European euphemism for protection?', Proceedings, FWAG Conference, Stoneleigh, November 29, 2001.
9. Swinbank, A. (2002) 'Multifunctionality: the concept, and its international acceptability', Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, Vol. 163, pp.141-148.
10. Nuppenau, E.-A. (2003) 'Multifunctionality, taxing for rural amenities, and non-competitive markets: tradable and non-tradable goods in political economy models', contributed paper presented at the International Conference Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO: Where are we heading? Capri, Italy, June 23-26, 2003.
11. Steiner, H.J. and Alston, P. (2000) International Human Rights in Context, 2nd edn, New York & Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Matsushita, M., Schoenbaum, T.J. and Mauroidis, P. (2003) The World Trade Organization: Law and Practice, London: Oxford University Press.
13. Diaz-Bonilla, E., Diao, X. and Robinson, S. (2003) 'Thinking inside the boxes: protection and investments in the development and food security boxes', contributed paper presented at the International Conference Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO: Where are we heading?, Capri, Italy, June 23-26, 2003.
14. OECD (2001) Multifunctionality: Towards and Analytical Framework, Paris.
15. Bishop, R.C., Champ, P.A. and Mullarkey, D.J. (1995) 'Contingent valuation', in D.W. Bromley (Ed.) Handbook of Environmental Economics, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp.629-654.
16. Bishop, R.C. and Walsh, M.P. (1999) 'Contingent valuation: incorporating nonmarket values', in K. Sexton, A.A. Marcus, K.W. Easter and T.D. Burkhardt (Eds) Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for Governments, Businesses, and Communities, Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 177-194.
17. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Valued Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.