Fetal Lung Volume Estimated by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cases with Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 353-358

  Ruano, Rodrigo ^a   Joubin, Laurence ^a   Sonigo, Pascale ^a   Benachi, Alexandra ^a   Aubry, Marie Cecile ^a   Thalabard, Jean Christophe ^a   Brunelle, Francis ^a   Dumez, Yves ^a   Dommergues, Marc ^a  

^a HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

Author keywords

3 dimensional ultrasonography; Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Fetal diagnosis; Fetal lung; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; ESTIMATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

HERNIA; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS;

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGM HERNIA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS LUNG; FETUS MALFORMATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LUNG VOLUME; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 1542287609     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.3.353     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sydorak RM, Harrison MR. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: advances in prenatal therapy. World J Surg 2003; 27:68-76.
2. Betremieux P, Lionnais S, Beuchee A, et al. Perinatal management and outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a 1995-2000 series in Rennes University Hospital. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 988-994.
3. Bohn D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:911-915.
4. Bagolan P, Casaccia G, Nahom A, et al. Severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH): a critical analysis of 8 years' experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002; 12:95-100.
5. Garne E, Haeusler M, Barisic I, Gjergja R, Stoll C, Clementi M. Euroscan Study Group. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evaluation of prenatal diagnosis in 20 European regions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19:329-333.
6. Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Estes JM, Howell U. A prospective study of the outcome for fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia. JAMA 1994; 271:382-384.
7. Tsukahara Y, Ohno Y, Itakura A, Mizutani S. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic eventration by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Perinatol. 2001; 18:241-244.
8. Mahieu-Caputo D, Sonigo P, Dommergues M, et al. Fetal lung volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. BJOG 2001; 108:863-868.
9. Paek BW, Coakley FV, Lu Y, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prenatal evaluation with MR lung volumetry-preliminary experience. Radiology 2001; 220:63-67.
10. Walsh DS, Hubbard AM, Olutoye OO, et al. Assessment of fetal lung volumes and liver herniation with magnetic resonance imaging in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:1067-1069.
11. Kalache KD, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound fetal lung volume measurement: a systematic study comparing the multiplanar method with the rotational (VOCAL) technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21:111-118.
12. Ruano R, Benachi A, Martinovic J, Grebille AG, Aubry MC, Dumez Y, Dommergues M. Can three-dimensional ultrasound be used for the assessment of the fetal lung volume in cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia? Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19:87-91.
13. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurements in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32:307-317.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between 2 methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990; 20:337-340.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346:1085-1087.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8:135-160.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22:85-93.