Network rigidity at finite temperature: Relationships between thermodynamic stability, the nonadditivity of entropy, and cooperativity in molecular systems

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 6 1, 2003, Pages 611091-6110922

  Jacobs, Donald J ^a   Dallakyan, S ^a   Wood, G G ^a   Heckathorne, A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPOLYMERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATIONS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ENTROPY; GRAPH THEORY; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); THERMODYNAMICS;

DISTANCE CONSTRAINT MODEL (DCM); NETWORK RIGIDITY;

MACROMOLECULES;

EID: 1542285840     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. J.C. Maxwell, Philos. Mag. 27, 294 (1864).
2. J.C. Phillips, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 34, 153 (1979).
3. M.F. Thorpe, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 57, 355 (1983).
4. M. Tatsumisago, B.L. Halfpap, J.L. Green, S.M. Lindsay, and C.A. Angell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1549 (1990).
5. X.W. Feng, W.J. Bresser, and P. Boolchand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4422 (1997).
6. Rigidity Theory and Applications, edited by M. F. Thorpe and P. M. Duxbury (Plenum, New York, 1999).
7. E. Guyon, S. Roux, A. Hansen, D. Bideau, J.-P. Troadec, and H. Crapo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 373 (1990).
8. S. Feng and P. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 216 (1984).
9. H. Crapo, Structural Topology 1, 26 (1979).
10. T.S. Tay and W. Whiteley, Structural Topology 11, 21 (1985).
11. J. Graver, B. Servatius, and H. Servatius, Combinatorial Rigidity, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 2 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993).
12. D.J. Jacobs and M.F. Thorpe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4051 (1995).
13. C. Moukarzel and P.M. Duxbury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4055 (1995).
14. D.J. Jacobs and B. Hendrickson, Comput. Phys. 137, 346 (1997).
15. D.J. Jacobs, J. Phys. A 31, 6653 (1998).
16. D.J. Jacobs, A. Rader, L.A. Kuhn, and M.F. Thorpe, Proteins 44, 150 (2001).
17. A.J. Rader, B.M. Hespenheide, L.A. Kuhn, and M.F. Thorpe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3540 (2002).
18. B.M. Hespenheide, A.J. Rader, M.F. Thorpe, and L.A. Kuhn, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 21, 195 (2002).
19. K.A. Dill, Biochemistry 29, 7133 (1990).
20. G.D. Rose and R. Wolfenden, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22, 381 (1993).
21. S.M. Habermann and K.P. Murphy, Protein Sci. 5, 1229 (1996).
22. The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000), Chap. 1.
23. D. J. Jacobs, L. A. Kuhn, and M. F. Thorpe, in Rigidity Theory and Applications, edited by M. F. Thorpe and P. M. Duxbury (Plenum, New York, 1999), pp. 357-384.
24. G.R. Hedwig and H.J. Hinz, Biophys. Chem. 100, 239 (2003).
25. J. Gao, K. Kuczera, B. Tidor, and M. Karplus, Science 244, 1069 (1989).
26. A.E. Mark and W.F. van Gunsteren, J. Mol. Biol. 240, 167 (1994).
27. The entropy loss from a redundant constraint is expected to be a small fraction of what would occur if the constraint was independent. Accounting for this second-order effect is possible at the expense of losing simplicity.
28. The DCM explicitly neglects relaxation within constraints. Relaxation in structure can be described by incorporating more geometrical bins at the expense of losing simplicity.
29. B.H. Zimm and J.K. Bragg, J. Chem. Phys. 28, 1247 (1958).
30. S. Lifson and A. Roig, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 1963 (1961).
31. G.N. Ramachandran, C. Ramakrishnan, and V. Sasisekharan, J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95 (1963).
32. S.C. Lovell, I.W. Davis, W.B. Arendall, III, P.I.W. de Bakker, J.M. Word, M.G. Prisant, J.S. Richardson, and D.C. Richardson, Proteins 50, 437 (2003).
33. The propagation rule was applied from left to right and right to left on 200 000 chains with length of 100 000 as well as millions of chains of lengths ranging from 10 to 1000 all having random conformations. These results were compared to exact calculation using the pebble game per framework. Agreement between all three results was always obtained.
34. s and the special matrices {S, R, Q} required expanding the dimension of the direct product space. The dim(T) referes to the subspace that excludes the s state.
35. Donald J. Jacobs and G. G. Wood (unpublished).
36. A. Mitsutake and Y. Okamoto, Chem. Phys. Lett. 309, 95 (1999).
37. Y. Peng, U.H.E. Hansmann, and N.A. Alves, J. Phys. Chem. 118, 2374 (2003).
38. M.J. Sippl, G. Némethy, and H.A. Scheraga, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 6231 (1984).
39. The objective of finding an optimal set of parameters with available data in the literature is outside the scope of this work. The subject of obtaining an accurate DCM parametrization is deferred to future work.
40. G.S. Grest and M.H. Cohen, Adv. Chem. Phys. 48, 455 (1981).
41. S. Hayward, A. Kitao, and N. Go, Proteins 23, 177 (1995).
42. Z.W. Cao and Y.Z. Chen, Biopolymers 58, 319 (2001).
43. M.F. Thorpe, D.J. Jacobs, M.V. Chubynsky, and J.C. Phillips, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 266-269, 859 (2000).
44. J.A. Schellman, J. Phys. Chem. 62, 1485 (1958).
45. A.J. Doig, Biophys. Chem. 101-102, 281 (2002).
46. D. Poland and H. A. Scheraga, Theory of Helix-Coil Transitions in Biopolymer (Academic Press, New York, 1970).
47. A third parameter called u in the LR model is arbitrarily set to unity, which is analogous to the arbitrary choices made in fixing some DCM parameters.
48. A. Bierzynski and K. Pawlowski, Acta Biochim. Pol. 44, 423 (1997).
49. D.B. Wetlaufer, Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 414 (1990).
50. A. Bierzynski, Comments Mol. Cell. Biophys. 4, 189 (1987).
51. H.A. Scheraga, J.A. Vila, and D.R. Ripoll, Biophys. Chem. 101-102, 255 (2002).
52. M. Carrion-Vazquez, A.F. Oberhauser, T.E. Fisher, P.E. Marszalek, H. Li, and J.M. Fernandez, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 74, 63 (2000).
53. D. Huynh, S. Dallakyan, and D. J. Jacobs (unpublished).