Enantioselective Chromatography and Molecular Modeling of Novel Aryloxyaminopropan-2-ols with the Alkyl Carbamate Function

Chirality

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 139-146

  Navrátilová, Hana ^a   Opatřilová, Radka ^b   Kříž, Zdeněk ^a   Koča, Jaroslav ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Aryloxyaminopropanols; Chiral recognition; Chiralcel OD H; Chiralpak AD; Enantioselective HPLC; Low energy conformers; Molecular modeling

Indexed keywords

2 PROPANOL; ALCOHOL; ATENOLOL; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; BUTYL N [2 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; BUTYL N [3 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; BUTYL N [4 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; CARBAMIC ACID; ETHYL N [2 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; ETHYL N [3 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; ETHYL N [4 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; HEXANE; METHYL N [2 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; METHYL N [3 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; METHYL N [4 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; PROPRANOLOL; PROPYL N [2 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; PROPYL N [3 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; PROPYL N [4 [3 (4 BENZHYDRYLPIPERAZINO) 2 HYDROXYPROPOXY]PHENYL]CARBAMATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ARTICLE; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING; CHIRAL CHROMATOGRAPHY; CHIRALITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG STRUCTURE; ENANTIOMER; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 1542276528     PISSN: 08990042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chir.20008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brody TM, Larner J, Minneman KP. Human pharmacology, molecular to clinical. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1998. p 135-136, 204.
2. Opatřilová R, Mokrý P, Csöllei J, Blešová M. Preparation and physicochemical properties of alkyl esters of 2-, 3-, and 4-[3-(4-benzhydrylpiperazino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl-carbamic acid. Čes Slov Farm 2002;51:306-310.
3. Kimura M, Masuda T, Yamada K, Kubota N, Kawakatsu N, Mitani M, Kishii K, Inazu M, Namiki T. Novel diphenylalkyl piperazine derivatives with dual calcium antagonistic and antioxidative activities. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002;12:1947-1950.
4. Okamoto Y, Kawashima M, Aburatani R, Hatado K, Nishiyama T, Masuda M. Chromatographic resolution. 12. Optical resolution of β-blockers by HPLC on cellulose triphenyl carbamate derivatives. Chem Lett 1986;1237-1240.
5. Aboul-Enein HY, Abou-Basha LI, Bakr SA. Direct enantioselective separation of some propranolol analogues by HPLC on normal and reversed cellulose stationary phases. Chirality 1996;8:153-156.
6. Okamoto Y, Yashima E. Polysaccharide derivatives for chromatographic separation of enantiomers. Angew Chem Int Ed 1998;37:1020-1043.
7. Koča J. Computer program CICADA-travelling along conformational potential energy hypersurface. Theochem J Mol Struct 1994;114:13-24.
8. Ponder JW, Richards FM. An efficient Newton-like method for molecular mechanics energy minimalization of large molecules. J Comput Chem 1987;8:1016-1024 and upgrades at http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/.
9. Allinger NL, Yuh YH, Lii JH. Molecular mechanics-the MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 1989;111:8551-8566.
10. Koča J. Potential-energy hypersurface and molecular flexibility. J Mol Struct 1993;291:255-269.
11. Kříž Z, Carlsen PHJ, Koča J. Conformational features of linear and cyclic enkephalins. A computational study. J Mol Struct Theochem 2001;540:231-250.
12. Imberty A, Perez S. Molecular modelling of protein-carbohydrate interactions. Understanding the specificities of two legume lectins towards oligosaccharides. Glycobiology 1994;4:351-366.
13. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics 1996;14:33-38.
14. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zakrzewsld VG. Montgomery JA Jr, Stratmann RE, Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA, Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck D, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ciolowski J, Ortiz JV, Baboul AG, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzalez C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA. Gaussian 98, Revision A.9. Pittsburgh: Gaussian Inc.; 1998.
15. Desiraju GR, Steiner T. The weak hydrogen bond in structural chemistry and biology. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press; 1999. p 29-121, 120-121, p 130-141.