The correlation of the bispectral index with propofol effect site concentrations is not altered by epochs indicated as artefact-loaded by narcotrend

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 283-287

  Ellerkmann, Richard K ^a,c   Kreuer, Sascha ^b   Wilhelm, Wolfram ^b   Wenningmann, Ingobert ^a   Roepcke, Heiko ^a   Hoeft, Andreas ^a   Bruhn, Jörgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artefact; Bispectral index; Narcotrend index

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; PATIENT TREATMENT; PROBABILITY;

ANAESTHESIA; ARTEFACT DETECTION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; PROPOFOL;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

ATRACURIUM; BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUTOMATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; BOLUS INJECTION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG INFUSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTUBATION; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSTATECTOMY; RECORDING; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SIMULATION;

EID: 15344341695     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-005-2700-8     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kreuer S, Biedler A, Larsen R, Schoth S, Altmann S, Wilhelm W. The Narcotrend - a new EEG monitor designed to measure the depth of anaesthesia. A comparison with bispectral index monitoring during propofol-remifentanil-anaesthesia. Anaesthesist 2001; 50: 921-925
2. Loomis AL, Harvey EN, Hobart CA. Cerebral states during sleep as studied by human brain potentials. J Exp Psychol 1937; 21: 127-144
3. J Kugler 1981 Elektroenzephalographie in Klinik und Praxis Thieme Stuttgart New York
4. Kreuer S, Wilhelm W, Grundmann U, Larsen R, Bruhn J. Narcotrend index versus bispectral index as EEG measures of anaesthetic drug effect during propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 692-697
5. Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 41-48. 1:STN:280:By6A3MrptF0%3D
6. Dyck JB, Varvel J, Hung O, Shafer SL. The pharmacodynamics of propofol vs. age. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38: A-106
7. Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 38-51. 10.1097/ 00000542-199601000-00005
8. Johnson LC. Autonomic measures as electrophysiological techniques for evaluation of the central nervous system. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 8B, Elselvier, 1973: Pp. 23-42
9. Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Hoeft A, Shafer SL. Artefact robustness, inter- and intra-individual baseline stability, and rational EEG parameter selection. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 54-59
10. JS Barlow 1986 Artefact processing in EEG data processing. In: FH Lopes Da Silva W Storm van Leeuwen A Remond ed. Clinical Applications of Computer Analysis of EEG and Other Neurophysiological Signal Elsevier Amsterdam 15-62
11. Eckert O. Automatic artefact detection in intraoperative EEG monitoring. Biomed Tech 1998; 43: 236-242
12. Kreuer S, Biedler A, Larsen R, Altmann S, Wilhelm W. Narcotrend monitoring allows faster emergence and a reduction of drug consumption in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 34-41. 10.1097/00000542-200307000-00009