Beat-to-beat heart rate adaptation in pediatric and late adolescent patients with closed loop rate-responsive pacemakers

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 212-218

  Drago, Fabrizio ^a   Silvetti, Massimo Stefano ^a   De Santis, Antonella ^a   Grutter, Giorgia ^a   Calcagnini, Giovanni ^b   Censi, Federica ^b   Bartolini, Pietro ^b   Barbaro, Vincenzo ^b  

^a BAMBINO GESÙ CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cycloergometry; Heart rate variability; Pediatric patients; Physiological pacing; Stress tests

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BICYCLE ERGOMETRY; CHILD; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLOSED LOOP STIMULATION; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART PACING; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEART STIMULATION; HEART VENTRICLE CONTRACTILITY; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; PACED HEART RATE; PHYSIOLOGIC HEART PACING; REST; RR INTERVAL; SPONTANEOUS HEART RATE; STANDING; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; REST; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 15344339218     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09431.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sliz NB Jr, Johns JA. Cardiac pacing in infants and children. Cardiol Rev 2000; 8:223-239.
2. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemaker and antiarrhythmia devices - Summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). JACC 2002; 40:1703-1719.
3. Chang CC, Wu MH, Lin JR. Transvenous permanent pacemaker implantation in children and adolescent. Acta Paediatr Taiwan (China) 2001; 42:350-354.
4. Koliopoulos N. Comparative study in exercise tolerance between VVI and activity-sensing rate-responsive pacing. Eur Heart J 1987; 8:159-161.
5. Celiker A, Alehan D, Tokel NK, et al. Initial experience with dual-sensor rate-responsive pacemakers in children. Eur Heart J 1996; 17:1251-1255.
6. Miller JD, Young ML, Atkins DL, et al. Rate-responsive ventricular pacing in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:1052-1053.
7. Ragonese P, Guccione P, Drago F, et al. Efficacy and safety of ventricular rate responsive pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block. PACE 1994; 17:603-610.
8. Lau CP, Rushby J, Leigh-Jones M, et al. Symptomatology and quality of life in patients with rate-responsive pacemakers: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Clin Cardiol 1989; 12:505-512.
9. Heynen H, Sharma A, Sutton R, et al. Clinical Experience with VVIR pacing based on right ventricular dP/dt. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1991; 1:138-146.
10. Sulke AN, Pipilis A, Henderson RA, et al. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity. Br Heart J 1990; 64:25-31.
11. Heinemann MK, Gass M, Breuer J, et al. DDD pacemaker implantation after Fontan-type operations. PACE 2003; 26:492-495.
12. Grolleau R, Leclercq F. Congenital atrioventricular block. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1999; 92:47-55.
13. Bostan OM, Celiker A. Dual chamber cardiac pacing in children: VDD or DDD pacemaker? Pediatr Int 2002; 44(6): 635-640.
14. Floris E, Joahannes M. Dilated cardiomyopathy in isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block: Early and long-term risk in children. JACC 2001; 37:1129-1134.
15. Kristensson BE, Arnman K, Ryden L. The haemodynamic importance of atrioventricular synchrony and rate increase at rest and during exercise. Eur Heart J 1985; 6:773-778.
16. Cabrera ME, Hanisch DG, Cohen MH, et al. Cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in children with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacemakers. PACE 1993; 16:1386-1393.
17. Kugler JD, Danford DA. Pacemakers in children: An update. Am Heart J 1989; 117:665-679.
18. Schaldach M, Hutten H. Intracardiac impedance to determine sympathetic activity in rate responsive pacing. PACE 1992; 15:1778-1786.
19. Pichlmaier AM, Braile D. Autonomic nervous system controlled closed loop cardiac pacing. PACE 1992; 15:1787-1791.
20. Malinowski K. Interindividual comparison of different sensor principles for rate adaptive pacing. PACE 1998; 21(2):2209-2213.
21. Osswald S, Cron T, Gradel C, et al. Closed loop stimulation using intracardiac impedance as a sensor principle: Correlation of right ventricular dP/dtmax and intracardiac impedance during dobutamine stress test. PACE 2000; 23:1502-1508.
22. Santini M, Ricci R, Pignalberi C, et al. Effect of autonomic stressors on rate control in pacemaker using ventricular impedance signal. PACE 2004; 27:1-9.
23. Puglisi A, Altamura G, Capestro F, et al. Impact of Closed-Loop Stimulation, overdrive pacing, DDDR pacing mode on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in Brady-Tachy Syndrome. A randomized study. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:1952-1961.
24. Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; 32:230-236.
25. Baselli G, Cerutti S, Civardi S, et al. Cardiovascular variability signals: Towards the identification of a closed-loop model of the neural control mechanisms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; 35:1033-1046.
26. Pieragnoli P, Colella A, Michelucci A, et al. A new algorithm for closed-loop stimulation: A feasibility study. PACE 2003; 26(1 Pt 2):229-232.