Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for cervical disc disease: What is your neighbor up to?

Journal of Neuroimaging

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-187

  Wolansky, Leo J ^a   Parikh, Dipti D ^a   Shah, Kartik J ^a   Yalamanchili, Raj ^a   Farkas, Jeffery ^a  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical spine; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Protocols

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DEMYELINATING DISEASE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HEALTH CENTER; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREVALENCE; SPINAL CORD LESION;

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPONDYLARTHRITIS;

EID: 15244349582     PISSN: 10512284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1051228404272886     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Osborn AG. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1994.
2. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1995.
3. Tsuruda JS, Remley K. Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:237-241.
4. Atlas SW, ed. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. 3rd ed. [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 2002.
5. Castillo M, ed. Spinal Imaging. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley and Belfus; 2001.
6. Stark DD, Bradley WG. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1999.
7. Ross J. Newer sequences for spinal MR imaging: smorgasbord or succotash of acronyms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:361-373.