Wood adhesives prepared from lucerne fiber fermentation residues of Ruminococcus albus and Clostridium thermocellum

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 635-640

  Weimer, P J ^a,b   Koegel, R G ^a   Lorenz, L F ^c   Frihart, C R ^c   Kenealy, W R ^c  

^a U S DAIRY FORAGE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; FERMENTATION; FILLERS; PLYWOOD;

ANAEROBIC CELLULOLYTIC BACTERIA RUMINOCOCCUS ALBUS 7; LUCERNE FIBER FERMENTATION; WOOD ADHESIVES;

ADHESIVES;

FORMALDEHYDE; PHENOL;

ALFALFA; BIOTECHNOLOGY; FERMENTATION;

ADHERENT CELL; ALFALFA; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMICAL BINDING; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRY WEIGHT; FERMENTATION; NONHUMAN; RUMINOCOCCUS ALBUS; SHEAR STRENGTH; WOOD;

ADHESIVES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; FERMENTATION; FORMALDEHYDE; MEDICAGO SATIVA; PHENOL; RUMINOCOCCUS; WOOD;

ADHESIVES; BACTERIA; FERMENTATION; FILLERS; WOOD;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CLOSTRIDIUM; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM ATCC 27405; MEDICAGO SATIVA; RUMINOCOCCUS ALBUS;

EID: 15244343755     PISSN: 01757598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-004-1767-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Society for Testing and Materials (1999) Standard practice for estimating the percentage of wood failure in adhesive bonded joints. (ASTM D-5266-99) American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa.
2. Blumenkrantz N, Asboe-Hansen G (1973) New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. Anal Biochem 54:484-489
3. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248-254
4. Chase KB (2000) Design and evaluation of a continuous press with a multiple conical roll chamber. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis.
5. Dien BS, Nichols NN, Skory CD (2004) Converting herbaceous energy crops to ethanol: a review with emphasis on pretreatment processes. In: Hou CT (ed) Handbook of industrial biocatalysis. Dekker, New York (in press)
6. Dubois M, Giles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350-356
7. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Agriculture handbook 379. Agricultural Research Service (US Department of Agriculture), Washington, D.C.
8. Kamm B, Kamm M (2004) Principles of biorefineries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:137-145
9. Kudo H, Cheng KJ, Costerton JW (1987) Electron microscopic study of the methylcellulose-mediated detachment of cellulolytic rumen bacteria from cellulose fibers. Can J Microbiol 33:267-271
10. Lambuth AL (2013) Protein adheseives for wood. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KL (eds) Handbook of adhesive technology, 2nd edn. Dekker, New York, pp 457-478
11. Lynd LR, Wyman CE, Gerngross TU (1999) Biocommodity engineering. Biotechnol Prog 15:777-793
12. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Zyl WH van, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506-577
13. Moore WE, Johnson DB (1967) Procedures for the chemical analysis of wood and wood products. Forest Products Laboratory (Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture), Madison, Wis., pp 67-027-1-67-027-7
14. National Institute for Standards and Technology (1995) Voluntary product standard PS 1-95 for construction and industrial plywood. National Institute for Standards and Technology, Washington, D.C.
15. SAS Institute (1998) SAS user's guide: statistics ver. 7.0. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
16. Weimer PJ, Conner AH, Lorenz L (2003) Solid residues from Ruminococcus cellulose fermentations as components of wood adhesive formulations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:29-34
17. Weimer PJ, Lopez-Guisa JM, French AD (1990) Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2421-2429
18. Weimer PJ, Odt CL (1995) Cellulose degradation by ruminal microbes: physiological and hydrolytic diversity among ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. ACS Symp Ser 618:291-304