Education, research, peritoneal dialysis, and the North American chapter of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 14-15

  Mehrotra, Rajnish ^a,b   Burkart, John ^c  

^a HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NORTH AMERICA; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 15044362495     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080502500104     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. United States Renal Data System. Excerpts from the USRDS 2003 an nual data report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42(Suppl 5): S1-230.
2. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, Morrison HI, Mao Y, Copleston P, et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates (see Comments). Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30:334-42.
3. Collins AJ, Hao W, Xia H, Ebben JP, Everson SE, Constantini EG, et al. Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34:1065-74.
4. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:112-17.
5. Prichard SS. Treatment modality selection in 150 consecutive patients starting ESRD therapy (see Comments). Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:69-72.
6. Little J, Irwin A, Marshall T, Rayner H, Smith S. Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37:981-6.
7. Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW, for the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43:891-9.
8. Mehrotra R, Sayre J, Marsh D, Peters V, Nissenson A. Low peritoneal dialysis utilization in the US: results of poor patient education [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23(Suppl 1):S24.
9. Nissenson AR, Prichard SS, Cheng IK, Gokal R, Kubota M, Maiorca R, et al. Non-medical factors that impact on ESRD modality selection. Kidney Int Suppl 1993; 40:S120-7.
10. Mehrotra R, Blake P, Berman N, Nolph KD. An analysis of dialysis training in the United States and Canada. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40:152-60.
11. Thamer M, Hwang W, Fink NE, Sadler JH, Wills S, Levin N, et al. US nephrologists' recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36:1155-65.
12. Furth SL, Hwang W, Yang C, Neu AM, Fivush BA, Powe NR. Relation between pediatric experience and treatment recommendations for children and adolescents with kidney failure. JAMA 2001; 285:1027-33.
13. Blake PG, Breborowicz A, Han DS, Joffe P, Korbet SM, Warady BA. Recommended peritoneal dialysis curriculum for nephrology trainees. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) Standards and Education Sub-committee. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20:497-502.