Selection of variables in exploratory factor analysis: An empirical comparison of a stepwise and traditional approach

Psychometrika

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 593-611

  Hogarty, Kristine Y ^a   Kromrey, Jeffrey D ^a   Ferron, John M ^a   Hines, Constance V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Exploratory factor analysis; Goodness of fit; Pattern accuracy; Selection accuracy; Statistical bias; Stepwise variable selection; Varimax rotation

Indexed keywords

EID: 14944371697     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02289857     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
2. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
4. Cliff, N., & Hamburger, C.D. (1967). The study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 430-445.
5. Comrey, A.L. (1973). A first courses in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
6. Cudeck, R., & O'Dell, L. (1994). Applications of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: Significance tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 475-487.
7. Everitt, B.S. (1975). Multivariate analysis: The need for data, and other problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 237-240.
8. Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
9. Finch, J.F., & West, S.G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439-485.
10. Gorsuch, R.L. (1973). Using Bartlett's significance test to determine the number of factors to extract. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 361-364.
11. Gorsuch, R.L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In J.R. Nesselroade & R.B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 231-258.) New York: Plenum.
12. Huberty, C.J. (1989). Problems with stepwise methods - better alternatives. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 1, pp. 43-70). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13. Kano, Y., & Harada, A. (2000). Stepwise variable selection in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 65, 7-22.
14. Knapp, T.R. (1978). Canonical correlation analysis: A general parametric significance testing system. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 410-416.
15. Little, T.D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J.R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.
16. MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L.B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
17. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-89.
18. Nunnally, J.C. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Robey, R.R., & Barcikowski, R.S. (1992). Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 283-288.
20. Snyder, P. (1991). Three reasons why stepwise regression methods should not be used by researchers. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (Vol. 1, pp. 99-106). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1983). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
22. Thompson, B. (1988a, April). Canonical correlation analysis: An explanation with comments on correct practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 957).
23. Thompson, B. (1988b, November). Common methodology mistakes in dissertations: Improving dissertation quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 301 595).
24. Thompson, B. (1989). Why won't stepwise methods die? Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 146-148.
25. Thompson, B. (1991, January). Stepwise methods lead to bad interpretations: Better alternatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327 573).
26. Thompson, B. (1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 525-534.
27. Thurstone, L.L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Velicer, W.F., & Fava, J.L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.