Nonlinear Mie scattering from spherical particles

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 24, 2004, Pages 1-8

  Pavlyukh, Y ^a   Hubner W ^a  

^a Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIPOLE; ELECTRIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PARTICLE SIZE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 14944369646     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.245434     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. D. Östling, P. Stampfli, and K. H. Bennemann, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 28, 169 (1993).
2. J. P. Dewitz, W. Hübner, and K. H. Bennemann, Z. Phys. D: At., Mol. Clusters 37, 75 (1996).
3. 2 for the approximation of Dewitz and co-workers.
4. G. Mie, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 25, 377 (1908).
5. J. Kasparian, B. Krämer, J. P. Dewitz, S. Vajda, B. Vezin, V. Boutou, T. Leisner, W. Hübner, J.-P. Wolf, and L. Wöste et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2952 (1997); see also comment by D. Carroll and X. H. Zheng, ibid. 81, 4272 (1998), and reply by J. P. Dewitz and W. Hübner, ibid. 81, 4273 (1998).
6. J. Kasparian, B. Krämer, J. P. Dewitz, S. Vajda, B. Vezin, V. Boutou, T. Leisner, W. Hübner, J.-P. Wolf, and L. Wöste et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2952 (1997); see also comment by D. Carroll and X. H. Zheng, ibid. 81, 4272 (1998), and reply by J. P. Dewitz and W. Hübner, ibid. 81, 4273 (1998).
7. J. Kasparian, B. Krämer, J. P. Dewitz, S. Vajda, B. Vezin, V. Boutou, T. Leisner, W. Hübner, J.-P. Wolf, and L. Wöste et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2952 (1997); see also comment by D. Carroll and X. H. Zheng, ibid. 81, 4272 (1998), and reply by J. P. Dewitz and W. Hübner, ibid. 81, 4273 (1998).
8. C. Favre, V. Boutou, S. C. Hill, W. Zimmer, M. Krenz, H. Lambrecht, J. Yu, R. K. Chang, L. Wöste, and J.-P. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 035002 (2002).
9. N. Yang, W. E. Angerer, and A. G. Yodh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 103902 (2001).
10. S. Roke, W. G. Roeterdink, J. E. G. J. Wijnhoven, A. V. Petukhov, A. W. Kleyn, and M. Bonn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 258302 (2003).
11. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981).
12. J. Martorell, R. Vilaseca, and R. Corbalán, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4520 (1997).
13. J. I. Dadap, J. Shan, K. B. Eisenthal, and T. F. Heinz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4045 (1999).
14. 0exp(ik·r). The electromagnetic wave is assumed to be monochromatic with frequency related to the k vector through the dispersion relation ω=ck. In the case when the intensity of the electromagnetic wave varies in time and, thus, the system is not in "steady state" one can follow a route suggested in the works of P. S. Pershan, Phys. Rev. 130, 919 (1963) and J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P. S. Pershan, ibid. 127, 1918 (1962). In this approach one introduces fields that are Fourier transformed over finite intervals. The length of the interval (T) is long enough so that ωT≫ 1, but still shorter than the time in which fields go from zero to the steady state.
15. 0exp(ik·r). The electromagnetic wave is assumed to be monochromatic with frequency related to the k vector through the dispersion relation ω=ck. In the case when the intensity of the electromagnetic wave varies in time and, thus, the system is not in "steady state" one can follow a route suggested in the works of P. S. Pershan, Phys. Rev. 130, 919 (1963) and J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P. S. Pershan, ibid. 127, 1918 (1962). In this approach one introduces fields that are Fourier transformed over finite intervals. The length of the interval (T) is long enough so that ωT≫ 1, but still shorter than the time in which fields go from zero to the steady state.
16. (2ω) with the effective field factors. Index ℓ denotes the order of multipolar expansion and should not be confused with notation (2ω) in the tensor of the second-order nonlinear susceptibility.
17. V. L. Brudny, B. S. Mendoza, and W. L. Mochan, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11 152 (2000).
18. E. V. Makeev and S. E. Skipetrov, Opt. Commun. 224, 139 (2003).
19. W. L. Mochan, J. A. Maytorena, B. S. Mendoza, and V. L. Brudny, Phys. Rev. B 68, 085318 (2003).
20. Y. Jiang, P. T. Wilson, M. C. Downer, C. W. White, and S. P. Withrow, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 766 (2001).
21. J. E. Sipe, D. J. Moss, and H. M. van Driel, Phys. Rev. B 35, 1129 (1987).
22. 4ν symmetry without loss of generality.
23. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999).
24. ℓ,m(θ, φ), L=(1/i)(r x ∇), ℓ ≥ 1. The absence of the ℓ=0 term results in the absence of an isotropic contribution to SHG.
25. I. S. Gradsteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York, 1980).
26. D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
27. D. Segelstein, Master's thesis, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 1981.
28. J. P. Dewitz, Diploma thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, 1994.