Towards autonomic application-sensitive partitioning for SAMR applications

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 519-531

  Chandra, Sumir ^a   Parashar, Manish ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomic partitioning; Dynamic applications; Runtime application characterization; Structured adaptive mesh refinement

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN FOR TESTABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTONOMIC PARTITIONING; DYNAMIC APPLICATIONS; RUNTIME APPLICATION CHARACTERIZATION; STRUCTURED ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 14944365419     PISSN: 07437315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2004.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ASCI/ASAP Center, http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/ASAP, California Institute of Technology.
2. M. Berger, G. Hedstrom, J. Oliger, G. Rodrigue, Adaptive Mesh Refinement for 1-Dimensional Gas Dynamics, Scientific Computing (IMACS/North-Holland Publishing), 1983, pp. 43-47.
3. M. Berger, and J. Oliger Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations J. Comput. Phys. 53 1984 484 512
4. G. Bryan, Fluids in the Universe: Adaptive Mesh Refinement in Cosmology, Comput. Sci. Eng. (March-April 1999) 46-53.
5. S. Chandra, and M. Parashar ARMaDA An Adaptive Application-Sensitive Partitioning Framework for SAMR Applications Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems Cambridge, MA November 2002
6. S. Chandra, M. Parashar, An Evaluation of Partitioners for Parallel SAMR Applications, in: R. Sakellariou, J. Keane, J. Gurd, L. Freeman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Euro-Par Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2150, Springer, Berlin, August 2001, pp. 171-174.
7. S. Chandra, M. Parashar, S. Hariri, GridARM: An Autonomic Runtime Management Framework for SAMR Applications in Grid Environments, New Frontiers in High-Performance Computing, Proceedings of the Autonomic Applications Workshop, 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing (HiPC), Hyderabad, India, Elite Publishing, December 2003, pp. 286-295.
8. M. Choptuik Experiences with an Adaptive Mesh Refinement Algorithm in Numerical Relativity C. Evans L. Finn D. Hobill Frontiers in Numerical Relativity 1989 Cambridge University Press London 206 221
9. P. Crandall, and M. Quinn A Partitioning Advisory System for Networked Data-parallel Processing Concurrency Practice and Experience 7 5 August 1995 479 495
10. S. Hawley, and M. Choptuik Boson Stars Driven to the Brink of Black Hole Formation Phys. Rev. D 62 2000 104024
11. Z. Lan, V. Taylor, and G. Bryan Dynamic Load Balancing for Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement Applications Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Parallel Processing Valencia, Spain 2001
12. M. Norman, G. Bryan, Cosmological Adaptive Mesh Refinement, Numerical Astrophysics 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999.
13. L. Oliker, and R. Biswas PLUM Parallel Load Balancing for Adaptive Unstructured Meshes J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 52 2 1998 150 177
14. M. Parashar, http://www.caip.rutgers.edu/∼parashar/TASSL/Projects/ GrACE, GrACE homepage, 2001.
15. M. Parashar, J. Browne, C. Edwards, and K. Klimkowski A Common Data Management Infrastructure for Adaptive Algorithms for PDE Solutions Proceedings of the Supercomputing Conference ACM/IEEE Computer Society, San Jose, CA November 1997
16. M. Parashar, J. Wheeler, G. Pope, K. Wang, and P. Wang A New Generation EOS Compositional Reservoir Simulator Part II - Framework and Multiprocessing Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineering Reservoir Simulation Symposium Dallas, TX June 1997
17. R. Pember, J. Bell, P. Colella, W. Crutchfield, and M. Welcome Adaptive Cartesian Grid Methods for Representing Geometry in Inviscid Compressible Flow Proceedings of the 11th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference Orlando, FL July 1993
18. H. Sagan Space-filling Curves 1994 Springer Berlin
19. K. Schloegel, G. Karypis, and V. Kumar A Unified Algorithm for Load-balancing Adaptive Scientific Simulations Proceedings of the International Conference on Supercomputing Dallas, TX November 2000
20. M. Shee, Evaluation and Optimization of Load Balancing/Distribution Techniques for Adaptive Grid Hierarchies, M.S. Thesis, Graduate School, Rutgers University, NJ, 2000.
21. J. Steensland, http://www.caip.rutgers.edu/∼johans/vampire, Vampire homepage, 2000.
22. J. Steensland, S. Chandra, M. Parashar, An Application-Centric Characterization of Domain-Based SFC Partitioners for Parallel SAMR, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 13, No. 12, IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MO, December 2002, pp. 1275-1289.
23. P. Wang, I. Yotov, T. Arbogast, C. Dawson, M. Parashar, and K. Sepehrnoori A New Generation EOS Compositional Reservoir Simulator Part I - Formulation and Discretization Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineering Reservoir Simulation Symposium Dallas, TX June 1997