Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

Spine

Volumn 29, Issue 20, 2004, Pages 2309-2318

  Verbeek, Jos ^a   Sengers, Marie José ^a   Riemens, Linda ^b   Haafkens, Joke ^a  

^a Coronel Inst Wk Environ/Hlth ^*  (Netherlands)

^b Stichting Patientenbelangen O   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Back pain treatment; Patient expectations; Patient satisfaction; Practice guidelines; Qualitative research; Quality of health care; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

BACKACHE; CHRONIC PAIN; COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDLINE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCINFO; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORK DISABILITY;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GOALS; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES;

EID: 14944364571     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142007.38256.7f     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Carey TS, Evans A, Kalsbeek W, et al. Care-seeking among individuals with low back pain. Spine 1995;20:312-7.
2. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primaty care: an international comparison. Spine 2001;26:2504-13.
3. Tuut MK, van Tulder MW, van Everdingen JJE, et al. Aspecifieke lagerugklachten. Bestaande Nederlandse en buitenlandse richtlijnen vergeleken. [Non-specific low-back pain: a comparison of Dutch and foreign guidelines]. Medisch Contact 2002;26:1016-9.
4. Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO. Richtlijn aspecifieke rugklachten. [Clinical practice guideline non-specific low-back pain]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CBO, 2002.
5. Hall JA, Roter DL, Milburg MA, et al. Why are sicker patients less satisfied with their medical care? Tests of two explanatory models. Health Psychol 1998;17:70-5.
6. Murphy DA, Roberts KJ, Martin DJ, et al. Barriers to antiretroviral adherence among HIV-infected adults. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2000;14:47-58.
7. O'Malley AS, Forrest CB, Mandelblatt J. Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:144-54.
8. Arnsten JH, Gelfand JM, Singer DE. Determinants of compliance with anti-coagulation: a case-control study. Am J Med 1997;103:11-7.
9. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high repotted levels. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1351-9.
10. Kalauokalani D, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, et al. Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects. Spine 2001;26:1418-24.
11. Goldstein MS, Elliot SD, Guccione AA. The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther 2000;80:853-62.
12. Hall JA, Dornan MC. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med 1988;27:935-9.
13. Verbeek J, van Dijk F, Räsänen K, et al. Consumer satisfaction with occupational health services: should it be measured? Occup Environ Med 2001; 58:0-6.
14. Thompson AGH, Sunol R. Expectation as determinants of patients satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care 1995;7:127-41.
15. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Those Carrying out or Commissioning Reviews, 4th ed, 2nd report. NHS Centre for reviews and dissemination, University of York, York, UK, 2001.
16. Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K. Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7: 125-33.
17. Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Pain 1998;77:1-13.
18. Verbeek JH. Vocational rehabilitation of workers with back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001;27:346-52.
19. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, et al. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Fam Pract 1999;16:4-11.
20. Barbour RS, Barbour M. Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. J Eval Clin Pract 2003;9:179-86.
21. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards of the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998;8:341-51.
22. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative Research in Health Care. London: BMJ, 1996.
23. BSA Medical Sociology Group. Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Med Social News 1996;22:68-71.
24. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000;284:357-62.
25. van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJJ, Koes BW, et al. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration back review group for spinal disorders. Spine 1997;22:2323-34.
26. Nyiendo J, Haas M, Goodwin P. Patient characteristics, practice activities, and one-month outcomes for chronic, recurrent low-back pain treated by chiropractors and family medicine physicians: a practice-based feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:239-45.
27. Nyiendo J, Haas M, Goldberg B, et al. Pain, disability, and satisfaction outcomes and predictors of outcomes: a practice-based study of chronic low back pain patients attending primary care and chiropractic physicians. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:433-9.
28. Rhodes LA, McPhillips-Tangum CA, Markham C, et al. The power of the visible: the meaning of diagnostic tests in chronic back pain. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1189-203.
29. McPhillips-Tangum CA, Gherkin DC, Rhodes LA, et al. Reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:289-95.
30. Sigrell H. Expectations of chiropractic patients: the construction of a questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:440-4.
31. Sehers H, Wensing M, Huijsmans Z, et al. Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study. Spine 2001;26: E348-53.
32. Abyholm AS, Hjortdahl P. Being believed is what counts: a qualitative study of experiences with the health service among patients with chronic back pain. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1999;119:1630-2.
33. Cedraschi C, Robert J, Perrin E, et al. The role of congruence between patient and therapist in chronic low back pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996;19:244-9.
34. Skelton AM, Murphy EA, Murphy RJ, et al. Patients' views of low back pain and its management in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1996;46:153-6.
35. Rogers WA. Beneficence in general practice: an empirical investigation. J Med Ethics 1999;25:388-93.
36. Grimmer K, Sheppard L, Pitt M, et al. Differences in stakeholder expectations in the outcome of physiotherapy management of acute low back pain. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:155-62.
37. Östlund G, Cedersund E, Alexanderson K, et al. "It was really nice to have someone"; lay people with musculoskeletal disorders request supportive relationships in rehabilitation. Scand J Public Health 2001;29:285-91.
38. Chew CA, May CR. The benefits of back pain. Fam Pract 1997;14:461-5.
39. Walker J, Holloway I, Sofaer B. In the system: the lived experience of chronic back pain from the perspectives of those seeking help from pain clinics. Pain 1999;80:621-8.
40. Pincus T, Vogel S, Savage R, et al. Patients' satisfaction with osteopathic and GP management of low back pain in the same surgery. Complement Ther Med 2000;8:180-6.
41. Cherkin DC, MacCornack FA. Patient evaluations of low back pain care from family physicians and chiropractors. West J Med 1989;150:351-5.
42. Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, et al. The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons: the North Carolina Back Pain Project. N Engl J Med 1995;333:913-7.
43. Curtis P, Carey TS, Evans P, et al. Training in back care to improve outcome and patient satisfaction: teaching old docs new tricks. J Fam Pract 2000;49: 786-92.
44. Carey TS, Evans AT, Hadler NM, et al. Acute severe low back pain: a population-based study of prevalence and care-seeking. Spine 1996;21: 339-44.
45. Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Patient satisfaction with medical care for low-back pain. Spine 1986;11:28-30.
46. Paterson BL, Thorne S, Dewis M. Adapting to and managing diabetes. Image J Nurs Sch 1998;30:57-62.
47. Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods: qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health 1997; 20:365-71.
48. Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). Br Med J 1997;315:740-3.
49. van der Weide WE, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ. Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:488-93.
50. Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, et al. Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2001;322:400-5.
51. Hermoni D, Borkan JM, Pasternak S, et al. Doctor-patient concordance and patient initiative during episodes of low back pain. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50: 809-10.
52. Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Green PA, et al. Chronic low back pain: the relationship between patient satisfaction and pain, impairment, and disability outcomes. Spine 1994;19:881-7.
53. Bredart A. Assessment of Satisfaction With Cancer Care: Development, Cross-cultural Psychometric Analysis and Application of a Comprehensive Instrument. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 2001.
54. Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, et al. Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology 1999;8:467-73.
55. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, et al. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001;357:757-62.
56. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, et al. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1021-9.
57. Owens DK. Spine update: patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine 1998;23:1073-9.
58. Klein BJ, Radecki RT, Foris MP, et al. Bridging the gap between science and practice in managing low back pain: a comprehensive spine care system in a health maintenance organization setting. Spine 2000;25:738-40.
59. Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Gherkin DC, et al. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine 2001;26: 206-11.
60. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001; 26:2535-42.