Convergence and the multidimensional niche

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 409-421

  Harmon, Luke J ^a   Kolbe, Jason J ^a   Cheverud, James M ^a   Losos, Jonathan B ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anolis; Convergent evolution; Ecomorphology; Geometric morphometrics; Mantel test

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; ECOMORPHOLOGY; HABITAT USE; NICHE; SPECIALIZATION;

ATLANTIC ISLANDS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; GREATER ANTILLES; OCEANIC REGIONS; WORLD;

ANOLIS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 14944363833     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00999.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alfaro, M. E., D. I. Bolnick, and P. C. Wainwright. 2004. Evolutionary dynamics of complex biomechanical systems: an example using the four-bar mechanism. Evolution 58:495-503.
2. Ben-Moshe, A., T. Dayan, and D. Simberloff. 2001. Convergence in morphological patterns and community organization between Old and New World rodent guilds. Am. Nat. 158:484-495.
3. Beuttell, K., and J. B. Losos. 1999. Ecological morphology of Caribbean anoles. Herpetol. Monogr. 13:1-28.
4. Böhning-Gaese, K., M. D. Schuda, and A. J. Helbig. 2003. Weak phylogenetic effects on ecological niches of Sylvia warblers. J. Evol. Biol. 16:956-965.
5. Butler, M. A., T. W. Schoener, and J. B. Losos. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54:259-272.
6. Calder, W. A., III. 1984. Size, function, and life history. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Casgrain, P. 2001. Permute! Vers. 3.4 alpha. University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
8. Chase, J. M., and M. A. Leibold. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
9. Elton, C. S. 1927. Animal ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, London.
10. Emerson, S. B., J. Travis, and M. A. R. Koehl. 1990. Functional complexes and additivity in performance: a test case with "flying" frogs. Evolution 44:2153-2157.
11. Frontier, S. 1976. Étude de la décroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyse en composantes principales: comparaison avec le modèle du bâton brisé. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25:67-75.
12. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42:265-292.
13. Glor, R. E., J. J. Kolbe, R. Powell, A. Larson, and J. B. Losos. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of ecological and morphological diversification in Hispaniolan trunk-ground anoles (Anolis cybotes group). Evolution 57:2383-2397.
14. Glossip, D., and J. B. Losos. 1997. Ecological correlates of number of subdigital lamellae in anoles. Herpetologica 53:192-199.
15. Gower, J. C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51.
16. Green, R. H. 1971. A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve molluscs of central Canada. Ecology 52:543-556.
17. Grinnell, J. 1917. The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk 34:427-433.
18. _. 1924. Geography and evolution. Ecology 5:225-229.
19. Herrel, A., R. Van Damme, and F. De Vree. 1996. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Podarcis hispanica atrata: testing the dietary divergence hypothesis by bite force analysis. Neth. J. Zool. 46:253-262.
20. Herrel, A., R. Van Damme, B. Vanhooydonck, and F. De Vree. 2001a. The implications of bite performance for diet in two species of lacertid lizards. Can. J. Zool. 79:662-670.
21. Herrel, A., E. De Grauw, and J. A. Lemos-Espinal. 2001b. Head shape and bite performance in Xenosaurid lizards. J. Exp. Zool. 290:101-107.
22. Hildebolt, C. F., and M. W. Vannier. 1988. Three-dimensional measurement accuracy of skull surface landmarks. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 76:497-503.
23. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22:415-427.
24. _. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93:145-159.
25. Irschick, D. J., and J. B. Losos. 1998. A comparative analysis of the ecological significance of maximal locomotor performance in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Evolution 52:219-226.
26. _. 1999. Do lizards avoid habitats in which performance is submaximal? The relationship between sprinting capabilities and structural habitat use in Caribbean anoles. Am. Nat. 154:293-305.
27. Irschick, D. J., C. C. Austin, K. Petren, R. N. Fisher, J. B. Losos, and O. Ellers. 1996. A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad-bearing lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59:21-35.
28. Jackman, T. R., A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and J. B. Losos. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. Syst. Biol. 48:254-285.
29. Jackman, T. R., D. J. Irschick, K. de Queiroz, J. B. Losos, and A. Larson. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic perspective on evolution of lizards of the Anolis grahami series. J. Exp. Zool. 294:1-16.
30. Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:1909-1920.
31. Koehl, M. A. R. 1996. When does morphology matter? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:501-542.
32. Larson, A., and J. B. Losos. 1996. Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation. Pp. 187-220 in M. R. Rose and G. V. Lauder, eds. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
33. Legendre, P., F. J. Lapointe, and P. Casgrain. 1994. Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487-1499.
34. Lewontin, R. 1985. Adaptation. Pp. 65-84 in R. Levins and R. Lewontin, eds. The dialectical biologist. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Lister, B. C. 1976. The nature of niche expansion in West Indian Anolis lizards. II. Evolutionary components. Evolution 30:677-692.
36. Losos, J. B. 1990a. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 60:369-388.
37. _. 1990b. Concordant evolution of locomotor behavior, display rate and morphology in Anolis lizards. Anim. Behav. 39:879-890.
38. _. 1992. The evolution of convergent structure in Caribbean Anolis communities. Syst. Biol. 41:403-420.
39. _. 1994. Integrative approaches to evolutionary ecology: Anolis lizards as model systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:467-493.
40. Losos, J. B., and K. de Queiroz. 1997. Evolutionary consequences of ecological release in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61:459-483.
41. Losos, J. B., and D. J. Irschick. 1996. The effect of perch diameter on escape behaviour of Anolis lizards: laboratory predictions and field tests. Anim. Behav. 51:593-602.
42. Losos, J. B., and B. Sinervo. 1989. The effects of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance in Anolis lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 145:23-30.
43. Losos, J. B., T. R. Jackman, A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and L. Rodriguez-Schettino. 1998. Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279:2115-2118.
44. Losos, J. B., M. Leal, R. E. Glor, K. de Queiroz, P. E. Hertz, L. Rodríguez-Schettino, A. C. Lara, T. R. Jackman, and A. Larson. 2003a. Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community. Nature 424:542-545.
45. Losos, J. B., M. A. Butler, and T. W. Schoener. 2003b. Sexual dimorphism in body size and shape in relation to habitat use among species of Caribbean Anolis lizards. Pp. 356-380 in S. F. Fox, J. K. McCoy and T. A. Baird, eds. Lizard social behavior. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
46. Macrini, T. E., D. J. Irschick, and J. B. Losos. 2003. Ecomorphological differences in toepad characteristics between mainland and island anoles. J. Herpetol. 37:52-58.
47. Mayer, G. C. 1989. Deterministic patterns of community structure in West Indian reptiles and amphibians. Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
48. McCracken, K. G., J. Harshman, D. A. McClellan, and A. D. Afton. 1999. Data set incongruence and correlated character evolution: an example of functional convergence in the hind-limbs of stiff-tail diving ducks. Syst. Biol. 48:683-714.
49. McLennan, D. A., and D. R. Brooks. 1993. The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding breeding in perching birds: a commentary. Am. Nat. 141:790-795.
50. Meacham, C. A. 1993. MorphoSys: an interactive machine vision program for the acquisition of morphometric data. Pp. 393-402 in R. Fortuner, ed. Advances in computer methods for systematic biology: artificial intelligence, databases, computer vision. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
51. Moermond, T. C. 1979a. Habitat constraints on the behavior, morphology, and community structure of Anolis lizards. Ecology 60:152-164.
52. _. 1979b. The influence of habitat structure on Anolis foraging behavior. Behavior 70:147-167.
53. Naganuma, K. H., and J. D. Roughgarden. 1990. Optimal body size in Lesser Antillean Anolis lizards - a mechanistic approach. Ecol. Monogr. 60:239-256.
54. Nicholson, K. E., R. E. Glor, J. J. Kolbe, A. Larson, and J. B. Losos. 2005. Mainland colonization by an island species. J. Biogeogr. In press.
55. Nylander, J. A. A. 2002. MrModelTest. Vers. 1.0b. Program distributed by the author. Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
56. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 255:37-45.
57. Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
58. Pounds, J. A. 1988. Ecomorphology, locomotion, and microhabitat structure: patterns in a tropical mainland Anolis community. Ecol. Monogr. 58:299-320.
59. Purvis, A., and A. J. Webster. 1999. Phylogenetically independent comparisons and primate phylogeny. Pp. 44-70 in P. C. Lee, ed. Comparative primate socioecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
60. Ronquist, P., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
61. Rosenberg, M. S. 2001. PASSAGE. Pattern analysis, spatial statistics, and geographic exegesis. Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
62. Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-109.
63. SAS Institute. 2003. JMP. Vers. 5. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
64. Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42:849-861.
65. _. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiations. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
66. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. Ø. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
67. Schoener, T. W. 1967. The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155:474-477.
68. _. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704-726.
69. _. 1969. Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards. I. Size and species diversity. Syst. Zool. 18:386-401.
70. _. 1970. Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards. II. Correlations with the sizes of particular sympatric species - displacement and convergence. Am. Nat. 104:155-174.
71. _. 1989. The ecological niche. Pp. 79-113 in J. M. Cherrett, ed. Ecological concepts: the contribution of ecology to an understanding of the natural world. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
72. Schoener, T. W., and G. C. Gorman. 1968. Some niche differences in three Lesser Antillean lizards of the genus Anolis. Ecology 49:819-830.
73. Sheets, H. D. 2003. IMP suite (integrated morphometrics package). Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
74. Slice, D. 2000. Morpheus et al.: software for morphometric research. Revision 01-31-00. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.
75. Spezzano, L. C., Jr., and B. C. Jayne. 2004. The effects of surface diameter and incline on the hindlimb kinematics of an arboreal lizard (Anolis sagrei). J. Exp. Biol. 207:2115-2131.
76. Stamps, J. A. 1977. The relationship between resource competition, risk, and aggression in a tropical territorial lizard. Ecology 58:349-358.
77. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Vers. 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
78. Thorpe, R. S. 2002. Analysis of color spectra in comparative evolutionary studies: molecular phylogeny and habitat adaptation in the St. Vincent anole (Anolis trinitatis). Syst. Biol. 51:554-569.
79. Thorpe, R. S., and A. G. Stenson. 2003. Phylogeny, paraphyly and ecological adaptation of the colour and pattern in the Anolis roquet complex on Martinique. Mol. Ecol. 12:117-132.
80. Verwaijen, D., R. Van Damme, and A. Herrel. 2002. Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency, and diet in two sympatric lacertid lizards. Funct. Ecol. 16:842-850.
81. Wainwright, P. C. and S. M. Reilly. 1994. Ecomorphology: integrative organismal biology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
82. Williams, E. E. 1972. The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna: a trial analysis. Evol. Biol. 6:47-89.
83. _. 1983. Ecomorphs, faunas, island size, and diverse end points in island radiations of Anolis. Pp. 326-370 in R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener, eds. Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.