Different goals, similar practices: Making sense of the mathematics and literacy instruction in a standards-based mathematics classroom

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 927-962

  Draper, Roni Jo ^a   Siebert, Daniel ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Content area literacy; Cooperative inquiry; Literacy; Mathematics education; Text

Indexed keywords

EID: 14944355103     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00028312041004927     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Alvermann, D. E., Dillon, D. R., & O'Brien, D. (1987). Using discussion to promote reading comprehension. Newark, DE; International Reading Association.
2. Blachowicz, C. L. Z., & Fisher, P. (2000). Vocabulary instruction. In R. Barr (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 503-523). Mahwah, NJ: Elbaum.
3. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkley: University of California Press.
4. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41-62.
5. Borasi, R., & Siegel, M. (2000). Reading counts: Expanding the role of reading in mathematics classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Burger, W. F., & Culpepper, B. (1993). Restructuring geometry. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 140-154). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
7. Carr, E., & Wixson, K. K. (1986). Guidelines for evaluating vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 29, 588-595.
8. Chall, J. S., Jacombs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (2000). Developing effective software. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 761-776). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (1995). Introduction: The coordination of psychological and sociological perspectives in mathematics education. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 1-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (Eds.). (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Cole, M. (1990). Cognitive development and schooling. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 89-110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Dahmus, M. E. (1970). How to teach verbal problems. School Science and Mathematics, 70, 121-138.
15. diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143-163.
17. Erlwanger, S. H. (1973). Benny's conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7-26.
18. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 75(1), 13-33.
19. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph 3). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
21. Habermas, J. (1976). Communication and the evolution of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
22. Habermas, J. (2001). On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action (B. Fultner, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M. (1998). Bakhtin without borders: Participatory action research in the social sciences. South Atlantic Quarterly, 97(3/4), 511-536.
24. Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In G. Williams (Ed.), Literacy in society (pp. 339-376). New York: Longman.
25. Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (Eds.). (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
26. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
27. Hynd, C. R., & Stahl, S. A. (1998). What do we mean by knowledge and learning? In C. R. Hynd (Ed.), Learning from text across conceptual domains (pp. 15-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Kremmis, S., & McTaggert, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567-605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Lampert, M., & Cobb, P. (2003). Communication and language. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 237-249). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
30. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Carpenter, S., & Penner, D. (2000). The interrelated development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (.pp. 325-360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Leinhardt, G., Zaslovsky, O., & Stein, M. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
32. Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 448-461.
33. Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & Estes, T. H. (2001). Content area literacy: Interactive teaching for active learning (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
34. Martinez, J. G. (2001). Exploring, inventing and discovering mathematics: A pedagogical response to the TIMSS. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(2), 114-119.
35. McIntosh, M. E. (1994). Word roots in geometry. Mathematics Teacher, 87(7), 510-515.
36. McIntosh, M. E., & Draper, R. J. (2001). Using learning logs in mathematics: Writing to learn. Mathematics Teacher, 94, 554-559.
37. Moje, E. B., Dillon, D. R., & O'Brien, D. (2000). Reexamining roles of learner, text, and context in secondary literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 165-180.
38. Moll, L. C. (1990). Introduction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 1-27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Monk, S. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Learning to graph and graphing to learn. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 250-262). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
40. Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association.
41. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In R. Barr (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
46. Neilson, L. (1998). Playing for real: Performative texts and adolescent identities. In D. R. Waff (Ed.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. O'Brien, D. G., Stewart, R. A., & Moje, E. B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 442-463.
48. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through cooperative inquiry. Management Learning, 30(2), 207-226.
50. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
51. Rotman, B. (1988). Toward a semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica, 72(1-2), 1-35.
52. Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (1994). Reading as a meaning-construction process: The reader, the text, and the teacher. In H. Singer (Ed.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 996-1056). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
53. Rudnitsky, A., Etheredge, S., Freeman, S. J. M., & Gilbert, T. (1995). Learning to solve addition and subtraction world problems through a structure-plus-writing approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 467-486.
54. Schensul, J. J., & Schensul, S. L. (1992). Collaborative research: Methods of inquiry for social change. In J. Preissle (Ed.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 161-200). New York: Academic Press.
55. Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56. Shaffer, D. W., & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics and virtual culture: An evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 97-119.
57. Siegel, M., Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (1998). Supporting students' mathematical inquiries through reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 378-413.
58. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
59. Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.
60. Sowder, L. (1988). Children's solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227-238.
61. Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
62. Vacca, R. T. (2002). Making a difference in adolescents' school lives: Visible and invisible aspects of content area reading. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 184-204). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
63. Vaccà, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. L. (2002). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
64. von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed.). (1991). Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Wade, S. E., & Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In R. Barr (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 609-628). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Wenger, I. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.