Student perspectives on the integration of interactive web-based cases into a family medicine clerkship

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 74-79

  Shokar, Gurjeet S ^a   Bulik, Robert J ^b   Baldwin, Constance D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^b University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EDUCATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEARNING; LINEAR SYSTEM; MEDICAL STUDENT; ONLINE SYSTEM; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW;

EID: 14944347613     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_13     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Parkinson GR, Muhlbaier LH, Falcone JC. A comparison of students' experience in family medicine and traditional clerkships. Medical Education 1984;59:124-30.
2. Rabinowitz HK. The precision phase: Seven years experience with a required family medicine clerkship for third-year medical students. Family Medicine 1983;15:168-72.
3. Kulik J. (1994) Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In Baker EL and O'Neil HF Jr (Eds.), Technology Assessment in Education and Training (pp. 9-33) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Educating medical students: Assessing change in medical education-the road to implementation (ACME-TRI Report). Academic Medicine 1993;68:S1-47.
5. Medical School Objectives Project Writing Group. Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: Report 1 of the Medical School Objectives Project. Academic Medicine 1999;13-8.
6. Salas AA, Anderson MB. Introducing information technologies into medical education: Activities of the AAMC. Academic Medicine 1997;72:191-3.
7. Hunt CE, Kallenberg GA, Whitcomb ME. Medical Students' Education in the Ambulatory Care Setting: Background paper 1 of the medical school objectives project. Academic Medicine 1999; 74:290-6.
8. Moberg TF, Whitcomb ME. Educational technology to facilitate medical students' learning: Background paper 2 of the medical school objectives project. Academic Medicine 1999; 74:1146-50.
9. Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Usatine RP, Adelman AM, Gjerde CL. Web-based education in family medicine pre-doctoral programs. Family Medicine 2000;32:430-4.
10. Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM. Integrating Web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: Development and evaluation. Academic Medicine 2003;78:295-301.
11. Adler MD, Johnson JB. Quantifying the literature of computer-aided instruction in medical education. Academic Medicine 2000;75:1025-1028.
12. Debourgh GA. Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: What matters most? Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2003;19:149-63.
13. Zwolski K. Student satisfaction with a Website designed for three nursing courses. CIN Plus. 2000;3:12, 6-7.
14. Baldwin D, Johnson J, Hill P. Student satisfaction with classroom use of computer-assisted instruction. Nursing Outlook 1994;42:188-92.
15. Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2000;16:132-9.
16. Shokar GS, Burns DS, Bulik RJ. Design-A-Case Template [computer program]. 2003 Galveston, TX: The University of Texas Medical Branch-Department of Family Medicine, 2003.