Coulomb drag in high Landau levels

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 24, 2004, Pages 1-20

  Gornyi, I V ^a,e   Mirlin, A D ^a,b,f   Von Oppen, F ^c,d  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^e IOFFE INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^f PETERSBURG NUCLEAR PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALLISTICS; CYCLOTRON; DISPERSION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OSCILLATION; QUANTUM THEORY; QUANTUM YIELD; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

EID: 14944342030     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.245302     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. T.J. Gramila, J.P. Eisenstein, A.H. MacDonald, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1216 (1991); Phys. Rev. B 47, 12957 (1993).
2. T.J. Gramila, J.P. Eisenstein, A.H. MacDonald, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1216 (1991); Phys. Rev. B 47, 12957 (1993).
3. U. Sivan, P.M. Solomon, and H. Shtrikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1196 (1992).
4. N.P.R. Hill, J.T. Nicholls, E.H. Linfield, M. Pepper, D.A. Ritchie, A.R. Hamilton, and G.A.C. Jones, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, L557 (1996).
5. H. Rubel, A. Fischer, W. Dietsche, K. von Klitzing, and K. Eberl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1763 (1997).
6. X.G. Feng, S. Zelakiewicz, H. Noh, T.J. Ragucci, T.J. Gramila, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3219 (1998).
7. M.P. Lilly, J.P. Eisenstein, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1714 (1998).
8. J.G.S. Lok, S. Kraus, M. Pohlt, W. Dietsche, K. von Klitzing, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler, Phys. Rev. B 63, 041305 (2001).
9. M. Kellogg, I.B. Spielman, J.P. Eisenstein, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 126804 (2002).
10. M. Kellogg, J.P. Eisenstein, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 246801 (2003).
11. K. Muraki, J.G.S. Lok, S. Kraus, W. Dietsche, K. von Klitzing, D. Schuh, M. Bichler, and W. Wegscheider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246801 (2004).
12. L. Zheng and A.H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 48, 8203 (1993).
13. M.C. Bønsager, K. Flensberg, B.Yu-K. Hu, and A.-P. Jauho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1366 (1996); Phys. Rev. B 56, 10314 (1997).
14. M.C. Bønsager, K. Flensberg, B.Yu-K. Hu, and A.-P. Jauho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1366 (1996); Phys. Rev. B 56, 10314 (1997).
15. A.V. Khaetskii and Yu.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7551 (1999).
16. F. von Oppen, S.H. Simon, and A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 106803 (2001).
17. A. Kamenev and Y. Oreg, Phys. Rev. B 52, 7516 (1995).
18. K. Flensberg, B.Yu-K. Hu, A.-P. Jauho, and J.M. Kinaret, Phys. Rev. B 52, 14761 (1995).
19. T. Ando and Y. Uemura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 36, 959 (1974); T. Ando, ibid. 37, 1233 (1974).
20. T. Ando and Y. Uemura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 36, 959 (1974); T. Ando, ibid. 37, 1233 (1974).
21. K.A. Benedict and J.T. Chalker, J. Phys. C 19, 3587 (1986). For a finite correlation length d of disorder, the SCBA is justified under the condition l≫d, see M.E. Raikh and T.V. Shahbazyan, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1522 (1993); B. Laikhtman and E.L. Altshuler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 232, 332 (1994).
22. K.A. Benedict and J.T. Chalker, J. Phys. C 19, 3587 (1986). For a finite correlation length d of disorder, the SCBA is justified under the condition l≫d, see M.E. Raikh and T.V. Shahbazyan, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1522 (1993); B. Laikhtman and E.L. Altshuler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 232, 332 (1994).
23. K.A. Benedict and J.T. Chalker, J. Phys. C 19, 3587 (1986). For a finite correlation length d of disorder, the SCBA is justified under the condition l≫d, see M.E. Raikh and T.V. Shahbazyan, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1522 (1993); B. Laikhtman and E.L. Altshuler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 232, 332 (1994).
24. I.V. Gornyi, A.D Mirlin, and F. von Oppen (unpublished).
25. B.N. Narozhny, I.L. Aleiner, and A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3610 (2001).
26. We remark that it was erroneously claimed in Ref. 12 that the vertex corrections are negligible for n ≠ n′.
27. μν. Therefore, neglecting such vertex corrections (Ref. 21) one loses the leading term (28).
28. I.L. Aleiner and L.I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B 52, 11296 (1995).
29. M.G. Vavilov and I.L. Aleiner, Phys. Rev. B 69, 035303 (2004).
30. D. at half filling of the lowest LL is reasonably well confirmed by the experimental data (Refs. 6 and 10) for the weak-coupling regime, the observed (Ref. 6) dependence of the drag on the magnetic field around half filling seems to disagree strongly with theory.
31. I. Ussishkin and A. Stern, Phys. Rev. B 56, 4013 (1997).
32. S. Sakhi, Phys. Rev. B 56, 4098 (1997).
33. Y.B. Kim and A.J. Millis, Physica E (Amsterdam) 4, 171 (1999).
34. The Coulomb drag at the quantum Hall transition was considered in E. Shimshoni and S.L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 49, 11484 (1994). However, this work suffers from the same deficiency as Refs. 12 and 13: its starting point is a formula for drag which misses the contributions related to particle-hole asymmetry induced by magnetic field.