An evaluation of the hunt94 color appearance model under different light sources at low photopic to low mesopic light levels

Color Research and Application

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 107-117

  Deng, Lei ^a   Chen, Linsheng ^b   Rea, Mark S ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Magna/Decoma International Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Color appearance model; Color naming and magnitude rating; Light sources; Mesopic vision

Indexed keywords

COLOR VISION; COLORIMETRY; FLUORESCENT LAMPS; HALOGEN COMPOUNDS; INCANDESCENT LAMPS; LIGHT EMISSION; LIGHT SOURCES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; XENON;

COLOR APPEARANCE MODEL; COLOR MAGNITUDE RATING; COLOR NAMING; MESOPIC LIGHT LEVELS; MESOPIC VISION;

COLOR;

EID: 14844366761     PISSN: 03612317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/col.20088     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fairchild MD. Color Appearance Models. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1998, 417 p.
2. Hunt RWG. Measuring Color, 3rd edition. Fountain Pr LTD; 2001, 335 p.
3. Hunt RWG. An improved predictor of colorfulness in a model of color vision. Color Res Appl 1994;19:23-26.
4. Nayatani Y, Sobagaki H, Hashimoto K, Yano T. Lightness dependency of chroma scales of a nonlinear color-appearance model and its latest formulation. Color Res Appl 1995;20:156-167.
5. Nayatani Y. A simple estimation method for effective adaptation coefficient. Color Res Appl 1997;22:259-268.
6. CIE. Colorimetry, 2nd edition. CIE Publication No. 15.2. Vienna, Austria: Central Bureau of the CIE 1986.
7. Fairchild MD. Refinement of the RLAB color space. Color Res Appl 1996;21:338-346.
8. Luo MR, Lo MC, Kuo WG. The LLAB color model. Color Res Appl 1996;21:412-429.
9. Fairchild MD. CIE TC 1-34 testing colour appearance models, progress report. 1997. Available: http://www.cis.rit.edu/fairchild/PDFs/134PR.pdf.
10. CIE. Publication 131-1998, The CIE 1997 interim colour appearance model (simple version), CIECAM97s; 1998.
11. Moroney N, Fairchild MD, Li C, Luo MR, Hunt RWG, Newman T. The CIECAM02 color appearance model. Proc. IS&T/SID Color Imaging Conference. 2002.
12. Hurvich L, Jameson D. An opponent process theory of color vision. Psychol Rev 1957;64:384-390; 397-404.
13. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color science: concepts, methods, quantitative data and formulae. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1982, 976 p.
14. Hard A, Sivik L, Tonnquist G. NCS natural color system-from concept to research and application. Part I&II. Color Res Appl 1996;21: 180-220.
15. Nayatani Y. Proposal of an opponent-colors system based on color appearance and color vision studies. Color Res Appl 2004;29:135-150.
16. He Y, Bierman A, Rea M. A system of mesopic photometry. Int J Lighting Res Technol 1998;30(4):175-181.
17. Boynton RM, Gordon J. Bezold-Brücke hue shift measured by color-naming technique. J Opt Soc Am 1965;55:78-86.
18. Hunt RWG. Revised color-appearance model for related and unrelated colors. Color Res Appl 1991;16:146-165.
19. Pointer MR. Measuring color rendering-a new approach. Light Res Technol 1986;4:175-184.
20. Hunt RWG. A color-appearance transform for the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer. Color Res Appl 1985;10:165-179.
21. McGuigan FJ. Experimental psychology, methods of research. 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1997, 364 p.
22. Hunt RWG. A model of color vision for predicting color appearance in various viewing conditions. Color Res Appl 1987;12:297-314.
23. Purdy DM. The Bezold-Brücke phenomenon and contour for constant hue. Am J Psychol 1937;49:313-315.
24. Pridmore RW. Bezold-Brücke hue-shift as functions of luminance level, luminance ratio, interstimulus interval and adapting white for aperture and object colors. Vision Res 1999;39:3873-3891.
25. Knight R, Buck SL. Rod influences on hue perception: effect of background light level. Color Res Appl 1999;S1:60-64.