Mammography with breast cushions

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 55-63

  Dibble, Suzanne L ^a   Israel, Jill ^a,f,g   Nussey, Brenda ^a,g   Sayre, James W ^b,d,h   Brenner, R James ^c,d   Sickles, Edward A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c JOHN WAYNE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g Institute for Health and Aging   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 14844361726     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Cancer Society. (2004). Cancer facts and figures. Available: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/stt_0.asp. Accessed April 7, 2004.
2. American College of Radiology Mammography quality control manual radiologic technologist's section 1999 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
3. A. Aro, P. Absetz-Ylostalo, T. Eerola, M. Pamilo, J. Lonnqvist Pain and discomfort during mammography European Journal of Cancer 32A 10 1996 1674 1679
4. D.A. Bakker, N.E. Lightfoot, S. Steggles, C. Jackson The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening Oncology Nursing Forum 25 1 1998 115 121
5. E. Bruyninckx, D. Mortelmans, M. Van Goethem, E. Van Hove Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening Social Science Medicine 49 7 1999 933 941
6. B. Dawson-Saunders, R. Trapp Basic and statistical biostatistics 2nd ed. 1994 Appleton and Lange Norwalk, CT
7. J. Dullum, E. Lewis, J. Mayer Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography Radiology 214 2 2002 547 552
8. M. Elwood, B. McNoe, T. Smith, M. Bandaranayake, T.C. Doyle Once is enough--why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme New Zealand Medical Journal 111 1066 1998 180 183
9. S.A. Feig Current status of screening mammography Obstetric and Gynecology Clinics of North America 29 1 2002 123 126
10. S.A. Feig How reliable is the evidence for screening mammography? Cancer Research 163 2003 129 139
11. M.K. Fine, B.K. Rimer, P. Watts Women's responses to the mammography experience Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 6 6 1993 546 555
12. M. Frank-Stromborg, S. Olsen Instruments for clinical health-care research 2nd ed. 1997 Jones and Bartlett Publishers Sudbury, MA
13. B. Hafslund Mammography and the experience of pain and anxiety Radiography 6 2000 269 272 (retrieved from Science Direct on 6/26/2003 at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6WPP-45C0W7S-D- 1&_cdi=6996&_orig=browse&_coverDate=11%2F30%2F2000&_sk= 999939995&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtzlSzBV&_acct=C000000152&_version= 1&_userid=4430&md5=12aa66ee2e7435c04a22f45cdae6bdf4&ie=f.pdf)
14. J.T. Jansen, J. Zoetelief Assessment of lifetime gained as a result of mammographic breast cancer screening using a computer model British Journal of Radiology 70 834 1997 619 628 (retrieved May 20, 2003 from http://bjr. birjournals.org/cgi/reprint/70/834/619.pdf)
15. C. Joyce, D. Zutshi, V. Hrubes, R. Mason Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 8 1975 415 420
16. S. Kashikar-Zuck, F. Keefe, P. Kornguth, P. Beaupre, A. Holzberg, D. Delong Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography a preliminary study Pain 73 2 1997 165 172
17. M. Keemer-Gels, R. Groenendijk, J. van den Heuvel, C. Boetes, P. Peer, T. Wobbes Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 60 3 2000 235 240
18. G. Kienle, H. Kiene Placebo effect and placebo concept a critical methodological and conceptual analysis of reports on the magnitude of the placebo effect Alternative Therapies 2 6 1996 39 54
19. P.J. Kornguth, F.J. Keefe, M.R. Conaway Pain during mammography characteristics and relationship to demographic and medical variables Pain 66 1996 187 194
20. E. Kremer, J. Atkinson, R. Ingelzi Measurement of pain patient preference does not confound pain measurement Pain 10 1981 241 248
21. L. Markle, D. Hines, K. Bock, J. Sayre Pain reduction during mammography utilizing a radiolucent pad 2001 5 Proceedings of the Society of Breast Imaging
22. G. Marshall A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments Journal of Public Health Medicine 16 1 1994 79 86
23. D. McNair, M. Lorr, L. Droppleman POMS manual for the Profile of Mood States 1971 Educational and Industrial Testing Service San Diego
24. D. Miller, I. Martin, P. Herbison Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Cochrane Database Systems Review 4 2002 CD002942
25. A. Poulos, M. Rickard Compression in mammography and the perception of discomfort Australasian Radiology 41 1997 247 252
26. R. Sapir, M. Patlas, S.D. Strano, I. Hadas-Halpern, N.I. Cherny Does mammography hurt? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 25 1 2003 53 63
27. P.C. Sharp, R. Michielutte, R. Freimans, L. Cunningham, J. Spangler, V. Burnette Reported pain following mammography screening Archives of Internal Medicine 163 2003 833 836
28. L. Tabar, G.S. Lebovic, G.D. Hermann, C.S. Kaufman, C. Alexander, J. Sayre Clinical assessment of a radiolucent cushion for mammography Acta Radiologica 45 2 2004 154 158
29. Wong, F. (1997). The manual of intervention strategies to increase mammography rates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with the Prudential Center for Health Care Research.