Comparison between two muscle models under dynamic conditions

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 373-387

  Raikova, R T ^a   Aladjov, H Ts ^a  

^a CENTRE OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Hill model; Motor control; Motor units; Muscle forces; Muscle model; Neural control

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

HILL-TYPE MODELS; MOTOR UNITS (MU); MUSCLE MODELING; TWITCH PARAMETERS;

MUSCLE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DYNAMICS; ELBOW FLEXION; FAST MUSCLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR UNIT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FORCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLOW MUSCLE;

MUS;

EID: 14844361291     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4825(04)00041-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. van den Bogert A.J., Gerritsen K.G.M., Cole G.K. Human muscle modelling from a user's perspective. J. Electromyog. Kinesiol. 8:1998;119-124
2. Tsirakos D., Baltzopoulos V., Bartlett R. Inverse optimization. functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 25:1997;371-407
3. Hof A.L. The relationship between electromyogram and muscle force. Sportverletzung Sportschaden. 11:1997;79-86
4. Zajac F.E. Muscle and tendon. properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17:1989;359-410
5. Raikova R., Aladjov H. The influence of the way the muscle force is modeled on the predicted results obtained by solving indeterminate problems for a fast elbow flexion. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 6:2003;181-196
6. Rehbinder H., Martin C. A control theoretic model of the forearm. J. Biomech. 34:2001;741-748
7. Thelen D.J., Anderson F.C., Delp S.L. Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J. Biomech. 36:2003;321-328
8. Li G., Kawamura K., Barrance P., Chao E.Y.S., Kaufman K. Prediction of muscle recruitment and its effects on joint reaction forces during knee exercises. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:1998;725-733
9. Wang L., Buchanan T.S. Prediction of joint moments using a neural network model of muscle activations from EMG signals. IEEE Trans. Neural Systems Rehabilitation Eng. 10:2002;30-37
10. Manal K., Gonzalez R.V., Lloyd D.G., Buchanan T.S. A real-time EMG-driven virtual arm. Comput. Biol. Med. 32:2002;25-26
11. van Zandwijk J.P., Bobbert M.F., Harlaar J. Predictions of mechanical output of the human m.triceps surae on the basis of electromyographic signals. the role of stimulation dynamics J. Biomech. Eng. 122:2000;380-386
12. Manal K., Buchanan T.S. A one-parameter neural activation to muscle activation model. estimating isometric joint moments from electromyograms J. Biomech. 36:2003;1197-1202
13. Stein R.B. Peripheral control of movement. Physiol. Rev. 54:1974;215-243
14. Raikova R.T., Aladjov H.Ts. Hierarchical genetic algorithm versus static optimization - investigation of elbow flexion and extension movements. J. Biomech. 35:2002;1123-1135
15. Raikova R.T., Aladjov Hr.Ts. Simulation of the motor units control during a fast elbow flexion in the sagittal plane. J. Electromyog. Kinesiol. 14:2004;227-238
16. Lemay M.A., Crago P.E. A dynamic model for simulating movements of the elbow, forearm, and wrist. J. Biomech. 29:1996;1319-1330
17. Brown I.E., Cheng E.J., Loeb G.E. Measured and modelled properties of mammalian skeletal muscle. II. The effects of stimulus frequency on force-length and force-velocity relationships. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motility. 20:1999;627-643
18. Johnson M.A., Polgar J., Weightman D., Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fiber types in thirty six human muscles. An autopsy study. J. Neurol. Sci. 18:1973;111-129
19. Pigeon P., Yahia L.H., Feldman A.G. Moment arms and lengths of human upper limb muscles as function of joint angles. J. Biomech. 29:1996;1365-1370
20. van Bolhuis B.M., Gielen C.C.A.M. A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions. Biol. Cybern. 81:1999;249-261
21. Perreault E.J., Heckman C.J., Sandercock T.G. Hill muscle model errors during movements are greatest within the physiologically relevant range of motor unit firing rates. J. Biomech. 36:2003;211-218
22. Gabriel D.A., Boucher J.P. Effects of repetitive dynamic contractions upon electromechanical delay. J. Appl. Physiol. 79:1998;37-40
23. Hof A.L. Muscle mechanics and neuromuscular control. J. Biomech. 36:2003;1031-1038
24. Chan K.M., Doherty T.J., Brown W.F. Contractile properties of human motor units in health, ageing, and disease. Muscle Nerve. 24:2000;1113-1133
25. Brown I.E., Loeb G.E. Measured and modeled properties of mammalian skeletal muscle. IV. Dynamics of activation and deactivation J. Muscle Res. Cell Motility. 21:2000;33-47
26. J.-Yu. Cheng, T.S. Buchanan, Comparison of three EMG-driven muscle models: performance for elbow joint under time-varying loading, Proceedings of ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, 1999, pp. 559-560.
27. Pandy M.G., Zajac F.E., Sim E., Levine W.S. An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping. J. Biomech. 23:1990;1185-1198