Large-scale dynamic optimization using the directional second-order adjoint method

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1804-1811

  Özyurt, Derya B ^a   Barton, Paul I ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COSTS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; VECTORS;

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; HESSIAN-VECTOR PRODUCTS; SECOND-ORDER ADJOINT METHOD;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

OPTIMIZATION;

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OSCILLATOR; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; SIMULATION; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 14844360646     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0494061     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Teo, K. L.; Goh, C.-J.; Wong, K.-H. A unified computational approach to optimal control problems; Longman Scientific & Technical: Essex, England, 1991.
2. Leineweber, D. B.; Bauer, I.; Bock, H. G.; Schlöder, J. P. An efficient multiple shooting based reduced SQP strategy for large-scale dynamic process optimization. Part 1: Theoretical aspects. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27, 157-166.
3. Leineweber, D. B.; Schäfer, A.; Bock, H. G.; Schlöder, J. P. An efficient multiple shooting based reduced SQP strategy for large-scale dynamic process optimization. Part II: Software aspects and applications. Comput. Chem. Eng 2003, 27, 167-174.
4. Petzold, L.; Rosen, J. B.; Gill, P. E.; Jay, L. O.; Park, K. Numerical Optimal Control of Parabolic PDEs using DASOPT. In Large Scale Optimization with Applications: Part II; Biegler, L. T., Coleman, T. F., Conn, A. R., Santosa, F. N., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1997.
5. Feehery, W. F.; Tolsma, J. E.; Barton, P. I. Efficient sensitivity analysis of large-scale differential-algebraic systems. Appl. Numer. Math. 1997, 25, 41-54.
6. Maly, T.; Petzold, L. Numerical Methods and Software for Sensitivity Analysis of Differential Algebraic Equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 1996, 20, 57-79.
7. Cao, Y.; Li, S.; Petzold, L.; Serban, R. Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis for Differential-Algebraic Equations: The Adjoint DAE System and Its Numerical Solution. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2003, 24, 1076-1089.
8. Bloss, K. F.; Biegler, L. T.; Schiesser, W. E. Dynamic Process Optimization through Adjoint Formulations and Constraint Aggregation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 421-432.
9. Özyurt, D. B.; Barton, P. I. Cheap second-order directional derivatives of stiff ODE embedded functionals. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., in press.
10. Nash, S. G. A Survey of Truncated-Newton methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 124, 45-59.
11. Nash, S. G. Newton-type minimization via the Lanczos method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1984, 21, 770-788.
12. Le Dimet, F.-X.; Navon, I. M.; Daescu, D. N. Second-Order Information for Data Assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev. 2002, 130, 629-648.
13. Wang, Z.; Navon, I. M.; Zou, X.; Le Dimet, F. X. A Truncated Newton Optimization Algorithm in Meteorology Applications with Analytic Hessian/Vector Products. Comput. Optimization Appl. 1995, 4, 241-262.
14. Griewank, A. Evaluating derivatives: Principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
15. Canto, E. B.; Banga, J. R.; Alonso, A. A.; Vassiliadis, V. S. Restricted second-order information for the solution of optimal control problems using control vector parameterization. J. Process Control 2002, 12, 243-255.
16. Özyurt, D. B.; Barton, P. I. Directional Second-Order Adjoint Method for Differential-Algebraic Equation Embedded Functionals. In preparation.
17. Marlow, W. H. Mathematics for Operations Research; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1978.
18. Wang, Z.; Navon, I. M.; Le Dimet, F. X.; Zou, X. The second-order adjoint analysis: Theory and Application. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 1992, 50, 3-20.
19. Li, S.; Petzold, L. Description of DASPKADJOINT: An Adjoint Sensitivity Solver for Differential-Algebraic Equations; Technical Report; University of California, Department of Computer Science and Engineering: Santa Barbara, CA 93106, 2001.
20. Nash, S. G.; Sofer, A. A barrier method for large-scale constrained optimization. ORSA J. Comput. 1993, 5, 40-53.
21. Nash, S. G.; Nocedal, J. A Numerical Study of the Limited Memory BFGS Method and the Truncated Newton Method for Large Scale Optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 1991, 1, 358-372.
22. Nash, S. G. Preconditioning of Truncated-Newton methods. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 1985, 6, 559-616.
23. Li, S.; Petzold, L. Design of New DASPK for Sensitivity Analysis; Technical Report; University of California, Department of Computer Science and Engineering: Santa Barbara, CA 93106, 1999.
24. Giering, R. Tangent linear and Adjoint Model Compiler: Users Manual 1.4; 1999, http://www.autodiff.com/tamc.
25. Banga, J. R.; Perez-Martin, R. I.; Gallardo, J. M.; Casares, J. J. Optimization of the Thermal Processing of Conduction-Heated Canned Foods: Study of Several Objective Functions. J. Food Eng. 1991, 14, 25-51.
26. Hindmarsh, A. C. ODEPACK, A Systematized Collection of ODE Solvers. In Scientific Computing; Stepleman, R. S., et al., Eds.; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, 1983.
27. Brenan, K. E.; Campbell, S. L.; Petzold, L. R. Numerical Solutions of Initial-Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1996.
28. Gill, P. E.; Murray, W.; Saunders, M. A. SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 2002, 12, 979-1006.