Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): Implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 395-408

  Gerhardt, H Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Female preference function; Hidden preference; Hyla chrysoscelis; Hyla versicolor; Sexual selection; Species isolation

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COMMUNICATION; FROG; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); VOCALIZATION;

HYLA; HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS; HYLA VERSICOLOR;

EID: 14844357047     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00998.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arak, A., and M. Enquist. 1993. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340:207-213.
3. Blair, W. F. 1958. Mating call in the speciation of anuran amphibians. Am. Nat. 92:27-51.
4. Burstein, H. 1971. Attribute sampling: tables and explanations. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Bush, S. L., H. C. Gerhardt, and J. Schul. 2002. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm. Anim. Behav. 63:7-14.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
7. Diekamp, B. M., and H. C. Gerhardt. 1995. Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177:173-190.
8. Endler, J. A., and A. L. Basolo. 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:415-420.
9. Espinoza, N. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2002. Population genetics of a polyploidy: Is there hybridization between lineages of Hyla versicolor? J. Hered. 93:81-85.
10. Gayou, D. C. 1984. Effects of temperature on the mating call of Hyla versicolor. Copeia 1984:733-738.
11. Gerhardt, H. C. 1974. The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J. Exp. Biol. 61:229-241.
12. _. 1978. Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor. Science 199:992-994.
13. _. 1981a. Mating call recognition in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa): responses to synthetic calls and comparisons with the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J. Comp. Physiol. 144:17-25.
14. _. 1981b. Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): importance of two frequency bands as a function of sound pressure level. J. Comp. Physiol. 144:9-16.
15. _. 1982. Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. Am. Zool. 22:581-595.
16. _. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42:615-635.
17. _. 1992. Conducting playback experiments and interpreting their results. Pp. 59-77 in P. MacGregor, ed. Playback and studies of animal communication: problems and prospects. NATO advanced research workshop. Plenum Press, New York.
18. _. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog H. chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47:959-969.
19. _. 1999. Reproductive character displacement and other sources of environmental selection on acoustic communication systems. Pp. 515-534 in M. Hauser and M. Konishi, eds. The design of animal communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. _. 2001. Acoustic communication in two groups of closely related treefrogs. Pp. 99-167 in P. J. B. Slater, J. S. Rosenblatt, C. T. Snowdon and T. J. Roper, eds. Advances in behavioral biology. Academic Press, New York.
21. Gerhardt, H. C., and J. A. Doherty. 1988. Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications. J. Comp. Physiol. A 162:261-278.
22. Gerhardt, H. C., and F. Huber. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Gerhardt, H. C., and J. Schul. 1999. A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse-rise time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. 1. Comp. Physiol. A 185:33-40.
24. Gerhardt, H. C., M. B. Ptacek, L. Barnett, and K. Torke. 1994. Hybridization in the diploid-tetraploid treefrogs Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor. Copeia 1994:51-59.
25. Gerhardt, H. C., S. D. Tanner, C. M. Corrigan, and H. C. Walton. 2000. Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Behav Ecol. 11:663-669.
26. Hennig, R. M. 2003. Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? J. Comp. Physiol. A 189:589-598.
27. Johnson, C. F. 1959. Genetic incompatibility in the call races of Hyla versicolor LeConte in Texas. Copeia 1959:327-335.
28. Keller, M. J., and H. C. Gerhardt. 2001. Polyploidy affects call structure in gray treefrogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:341-345.
29. Ohna, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer Verlag, NY.
30. Ptacek, M. B., H. C. Gerhardt, and R. D. Sage. 1994. Speciation by polyploidy in treefrogs: multiple origins of the tetraploid, Hyla versicolor. Evolution 48:898-908.
31. Ralin, D. B. 1977. Evolutionary aspects of mating call variation in a diploid-tetraploid species complex of treefrogs (Anura). Evolution 31:721-736.
32. Rheinlaender, J., H. C. Gerhardt, D. Yager, and R. R. Capranica. 1979. Accuracy of phonotaxis in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J. Comp. Physiol. 133:247-255.
33. Rousseeuw, P., and A. Leroy. 1987. Robust regression and outlier detection. John Wiley, New York.
34. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340:187-195.
35. Shaw, K. L., and D. Herlihy. 2000. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:577-584.
36. Schul, J. 1998. Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia). J. Comp. Physiol. A 183:401-410.
37. Schul, J., and S. L. Bush. 2002. Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:847-852.
38. Stumpner, A., and O. V. Helversen. 1994. Song production and song recognition in a group of sibling grasshopper species (Chorthippus dorsatus, Ch. dichrous and Ch. loratus: Orthoptera: Acrididae). Bioacoustics 6:1-27.
39. Uttal, W. R. 1973 The psychobiology of sensory coding. Harper & Row, New York.
40. Wagner, W. E., Jr. 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 55:1029-1042.
41. Wasserman, A. O. 1970. Polyploidy in the common tree toad Hyla versicolor Le Conte Science 167:385-386.