Developing and validating a nursing website evaluation questionnaire

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 406-413

  Tsai, Sing Ling ^a,b   Chai, Sin Kuo ^c  

^a TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNGTAI INST HLTH SCI TECHNOL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Evaluation questionnaire; Nursing; Nursing website

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSING; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 14844352238     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03304.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baker L., Wagner T., Todd H., Singer S. & Bundorf M.K. (2003) Use of the Internet and E-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. The Journal of American Medical association 289(18), 2400-2406.
2. Beck S. (1997) The good, the bad, and the ugly: or, why it's a good idea to evaluate Web sources. Available at: http://lib.nmsu.edu/ instruction/eval. htm.
3. Best Graduate Schools (2002) Top 20 nursing schools. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/beyond/gradrank/gbrank.htm.
4. Clark D.J. (2000) Old wine in new bottles: delivering nursing in the 21st century. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 32(1), 11-15.
5. Comarow A. (2001) Top five hospitals. Available at: http:// www.usnews.com/usnews/nycu/health/hosptl/honorroll.htm.
6. Cravener P.A. (2000) The world wide nursing web. American Journal of Nursing 100(11), 75-76.
7. Doupi P. & van der Lei J. (1999) Rx medication information for the public and the WWW: quality issue. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 24, 171-179.
8. Eysenbach G., Powell J., Kuss O. & Sa E.-R. (2002) Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 2691-2700.
9. Fitzmaurice D.A. & Adams J.L. (2000) A systematic review of patient information leaflets for hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension 14, 259-262.
10. Grandinetti D.A. (2000) Help patients surf the Net safely. Register Nurse 63(8), 51-54.
11. Health on the Net Foundation (2003) HON code of conduct for medical and health Web sites. Available at: http://www.hon.ch/ HONcode/Conduct.html. Accessed December 16, 2002.
12. Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N. & Bonati M. (1997) Reliability of Health information for the public on the World Wide Web. British Medical Journal 314, 1875-1879.
13. Jadad A.R. & Gagliardi A. (1998) Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to label? Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(8), 611-614.
14. Kiley R. (2000) Finding health information on the Internet: health consumers. Hospital Medicine 61(11), 799-801.
15. Kim P., Eng T.R., Deering M.J. & Maxfield A. (1999) Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. British Medical Journal 318(7184), 647-649.
16. Latthe P.M., Latthe M. & Khan K.S. (2000) Quality of medical information about menorrhagia on the worldwide web. British Journal of Gynecology: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 107, 39-43.
17. Lynch P.J. & Horton S. (1997) Web style guide. Available at: http:// info.med.yale.edu/caim./manual/intro/purpose.html.
18. Nielsen/Net Ratings (2003) The global standard for internet audience measurement and analysis. Available at: http://www.nielsennetratings.com/news. jsp?section:dat_gi. Accessed Nov 16, 2003.
19. Richard W. (2001) Sixty ticks for a good website. Available: http:// www.waller.co.uk.
20. Timmons S. (2001) Use of the Internet by patients: not a threat to nursing, but an opportunity. Nurse Education Today 21, 104-109.
21. Willems M. & Bouvy M.L. (2001) Gezondheidsinformatie op het internet: de kwaliteit van websites vergeleken. Medisch Contact 56, 673-676.
22. Wyatt J.C. (1997) Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web. British Medical Journal 314(7098), 1879-1881.