Clinical evaluation of three different materials used as pit and fissure sealant: 24-Months results

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 133-137

  Pardi, Vanessa ^a,b   Pereira, Antonio Carlos ^a   Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi ^a   De Castro Meneghim, Marcelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DO SAGRADO CORAÇÃO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISSURE SEALANT; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTAL CARIES; EVALUATION; RANDOMIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH PLAQUE;

EID: 14844347371     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.2.e44h17387x324345     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Vrbic V. Reasons for the caries decline in Slovenia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 28: 126-32, 2000.
2. Truin GJ, Konig KG, Bronkhorst EM. et al. Time trends in caries experience of 6- and 12-year-old children of different socioeconomic status in The Hague. Caries Res 32: 1-4, 1998.
3. Newbrun E. Preventing dental decays: current and prospective strategies. J Am Dent Assoc 123: 68-73, 1992.
4. Kaste LM, Selwitz RH, Oldakowski RJ. et al. Coronal caries in the primary and permanent dentition of children and adolescents 1-17 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 75: 631-41, 1996.
5. Meneghim MC, Saliba NA, Pereira AC. Importance of the first permanent molars in the determination of DMFT Index. J Bras Odontopediatr Odontol Bebê 2: 37-41, 1999. (Portuguese)
6. Ripa LW. Sealants revised: an update of the effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants. Caries Res 27: 77-82, 1993.
7. Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 29: 298-301, 2001.
8. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24: 393-414, 2002.
9. Boksman L, Gratton DR, McCutcheon E. et al: Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as a fissure sealant. Quintessence Int 18: 707-9, 1987.
10. Mejäre I, Mjör IA. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res 98: 345-50, 1990.
11. Forss H, Halme E. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26: 21-5, 1998.
12. Pereira AC, Basting RT, Pinelli C, et al. Retention and caries prevention of Vitremer® and Ketac-Bond®, used as occlusal sealants after 6 and 12 months. Am J Dent 12: 62-4, 1999.
13. Pereira AC, Pardi V, Mialhe FL, et al. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin used as fissure sealant: a 48 month follow up. Am J Dent 13: 294-6, 2000.
14. Pardi V, Pereira AC, Mialhe FL, et al. A 5-year evaluation of two glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31: 386-9, 2003.
15. Winkler MM, Deschepper EJ, Dean JA, et al. Using a resin modified glass ionomer as an occlusal sealant: a one year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 127: 1508-14, 1996.
16. Smales RJ, Wong KC. 2-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent 12: 59-61, 1999.
17. O Critério ABA/ABIPEME. Revista Mercado Global. 41-84, 1984. (Portuguese)
18. Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. J Am Dent Assoc 68: 7-13, 1964.
19. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Características clínicas e patológicas da cárie dentária. In: Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Cariologia Clínica. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Livraria Santos Editera, pp. 111-157, 1995.
20. Ketley CE, Holt RD. Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars. Br Dent J 174: 364-70, 1993.
21. Aranda M, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of the retention and wear of a light-cured pit and fissure glass ionomer sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19: 273-7, 1995.
22. de Luca-Fraga LR, Freire Pimenta LA. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Quintessence Int 32: 463-8, 2001.
23. Pereira AC, Pardi V, Basting RT. et al. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers used as fissure sealants: Twenty-four-months results. J Dent Child 58: 168-74, 2001.
24. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppa L. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 22: 21-24, 1994.
25. Holst A, Braune K, Sullivan A. A five-year evaluation of fissure sealants applied by dental assistants. Swed Dent J 22: 195-201, 1998.
26. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 27: 203-9, 1996.
27. Peutzfeldt A, Garcia-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 10: 15-7, 1997.
28. Futatsuki M, Nozawa M, Ogata T et al. Wear of resin-modified glass ionomers: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 25: 297-301, 2001.
29. Carvalho JC, Thylstrup A, Ekstrand KR. Results after 3 years of non-operative occlusal caries treatment of erupting permanent first molars. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20: 187-92, 1992.
30. Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW. Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 11: 96-101, 1995.
31. Levallois B, Fovet Y, Lapeyre L. In vitro fluoride release from restorative materials in water versus artificial saliva medium (SAGF). Dent Mater 14: 441-7, 1998.
32. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 19: 503-8, 1998.
33. Kozlowsky FC. Relation between socioeconomic factor and prevalence and severity of caries and fluorosis. [Master's Dissertation]. Piracicaba: Dentistry College, UNICAMP, p. 165, 2002. (Portuguese)