Organizational cooperation in teleradiology

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-50

  Monrad Aas, I H ^a  

^a WORK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NORWAY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NORWAY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; TELERADIOLOGY;

EID: 14844343206     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1357633053430449     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Cohen SG, Mankin D. Collaboration in the virtual organization. In: Cooper CL, Rousseau DM, eds. The Virtual Organization. Trends in Organizational Behaviour. Vol. 6. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999:105-20
2. van Gils MR. Interorganizational relations and networks. In: Drenth PJD, Thierry H, Willems PJ, de Wolff CJ, eds. Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 2. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1984:1073-100
3. Webster's New World Dictionary. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1994
4. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. Br Med J 2000;320:569-72
5. Aas IH. Telemedical work and cooperation. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:212-18
6. Akselsen S, Eidsvik AK, Folkow T. ISDN: new possibilities for telemedicine. Telektronikk 1993;89:64-71
7. May C, Harrison R, Finch T, et al. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:596-604
8. Salvador CH, Gonzalez MA, Munoz A, Pascual M. Teleradiology from primary care: comparison of user activity in two different scenarios. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:178-82
9. Hagedoorn J, Duysters J. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: the efficacy of multiple contacts. Org Studies 2002;23:525-48
10. Cascio WF. Virtual workplaces: implications for organizational behaviour. In: Cooper CL, Rousseau DM, eds. The Virtual Organization. Trends in Organizational Behaviour. Vol. 6. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999:1-4
11. Karasti H, Reponen J, Tervonen O, Kuutti K. The teleradiology system and changes in work practices. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1998;57:69-78
12. Weinstein RS, Dunn BE, Graham AR. Telepathology networks as models of telemedicine services by cybercorps. New Med 1997;1:235-41
13. Welsh T, Pringle M. Social capital. Br Med J 2001;323:177-8
14. Chanlat J-F. Conflict and politics. In: Sorge A, Warner M, eds. The IEBM Handbook of Organizational Behaviour. London: International Thomson Business Press, 1997:472-80
15. Berggren L. Människors revir i hälso- och sjukvå rdsorganisationen. [The defence of own territory in the health care organization.] In: Köhler L, ed. Folkhälsovetenskap. Ett nordiskt perspektiv. [Public health science. A Nordic perspective.] Vol. 2. Göteborg: A Nordic School of Public Health Report, 1989:197-212
16. Aas IH. Organizational change: decentralization in hospitals. Int J Health Plan Manage 1997;12:103-14
17. Krupinski E, McNeill K, Haber K, Ovitt T. High-volume teleradiology service: focus on radiologist satisfaction. J Digital Imag 2003;16:203-9
18. Caramella D, Reponen J, Fabbrini F, Bartolozzi C. Teleradiology in Europe. Eur J Radiol 2000;33:2-7
19. Aas IH. Incentives and financing methods. Health Policy 1995;34:205-20
20. Robinson DF, Savage GT, Campbell KS. Organizational learning, diffusion of innovation, and international collaboration in telemedicine. Health Care Manage Rev 2003;28:68-78
21. Aas IH. Changes in the job situation due to telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:41-7
22. Levine BA, Cleary KR, Norton GS, Mun SK. Experience implementing a DICOM 3.0 multivendor teleradiology network. Telemed J 1998;4:167-75
23. ACR Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards. See http:// www.acr.org/dyna/?doc=departments/stand_accred/standards/standards.html (last checked 17 September 2004)
24. Leys M. Health care policy: qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. Health Policy 2003;65:217-26
25. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. Br Med J 1995;311:109-12
26. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? Br Med J 2001;322:1115-17
27. Devers KJ. How will we know 'good' qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1153-88
28. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1189-208
29. Clark JP. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. In: Godlee F, Jefferson DM, eds. Peer Review in Health Sciences. 2nd edn. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2003:219-35
30. O'Connor GC, Rice MP, Peters L, Veryzer RW. Managing interdisciplinary, longitudinal research teams: extending grounded theory-building methodologies. Org Sci 2003:14:353-73
31. Aas IHM. Organizing for remote consultations in health care - the production process. Behav Inform Technol 2003;22:91-100
32. Buunk BP, Jonge J de, Ybema JF, Wolff CJ de. Psychosocial aspects of occupational stress. In: Drenth PJD, Thierry H, de Wolff CJ, eds. Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 2. Work Psychology. 2nd edn. East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd, 1998:145-82
33. See http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/cars2003/cars5.shtml (last checked 17 September 2004)