What's cooking? Theory and practice in the kitchen

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 67-74

  Bryant, Wendy ^a   McKay, Elizabeth ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CANADA; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; KITCHEN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; SOCIAL WORK; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 14844341767     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030802260506800203     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bateson M (1996) Enfolded activity and the concept of occupation. In: R Zemke, F Clark, eds. Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
2. Bolton G (2001) Reflective practice: writing and professional development. London: Paul Chapman.
3. Campbell J (2002) Valuing diversity: the disability agenda - we've only just begun. Disability and Society, 17(4), 471-78.
4. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1997) Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ontario: CAOT Publications ACE.
5. Community Occupational Therapy Services (1999) Report of Conference Programme: Linking the thinking - integrating practices. London: Department of Health.
6. Creek J (1998) Purposeful activity. In: J Creek, ed. Occupational therapy: new perspectives. London: Whurr, 16-28.
7. Creek J (2003) A definition of occupational therapy as a complex intervention. London: College of Occupational Therapists.
8. Csikszentmihalyi M (1992) Flow. London: Rider.
9. Emerson H (1998) Flow and occupation: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(1), 37-44.
10. Frank G (1996) The concept of adaptation as a foundation for occupational science research. In: R Zemke, F Clark, eds. Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
11. Golledge J (1998) Distinguishing between occupation, purposeful activity and activity; part 1: review and explanation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(3), 100-105.
12. Harvey A, Pentland W (2004) What do people do? In: C Christiansen, E Townsend, eds. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 63-90.
13. Hasselkus B (1998) Occupation and well-being in dementia: the experience of day-care staff. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(6), 423-34.
14. Hasselkus B (2002) The meaning of everyday occupations. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
15. Hocking C (2000) Occupational science: a stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58-67.
16. Kielhofner G (1997) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Philadephia: FA Davis, 187-217.
17. Mattingly C, Fleming M (1994) Clinical reasoning: forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
18. McColl MA (2003) The occupational therapy toolbox: uses of theory in occupational therapy. In: MA McColl, MC Law, L Doubt, N Pollock, D Steward, eds. Theoretical basis of occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 7-10.
19. Melton J (1998) How do clients with learning disabilities evaluate their experience of cooking with the occupational therapist? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(3), 106-10.
20. Nelson D (1996) Therapeutic occupation: a definition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(10), 775-82.
21. Oliver M (1999) Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
22. Pentland W, Tremblay M, Spring K, Rosenthal C (1999) Women with physical disabilities: occupational impacts of ageing. Journal of Occupational Science, 6(3), 111-23.
23. Perks M (1998) Oil and water. In: J Creek, ed. Occupational therapy: new perspectives. London: Whurr, 142-55.
24. Polgar J, Landry J (2004) Occupations as a means for individual and group participation in life. In: C Christiansen, E Townsend, eds. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 197-220.
25. Porter J, Watson G, Capra S (1998) Food skills assessment tools for people with a mental illness. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(2), 65-71.
26. Primeau L (1996) Work versus nonwork: the case of household work. In: R Zemke, F Clark, eds. Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
27. Reilly M (1962) Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 1-9.
28. Rigby P, Letts L (2003) Environment and occupational performance: theoretical considerations. In: L Letts, P Rigby, D Stewart, eds. Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 17-32.
29. Ruskin J (1907/2000) Sesame and lilies Facsimile edition. Lancashire: Hendon Publishing.
30. Stark S (2003) Home modifications that enable occupational performance. In: L Letts, P Rigby, D Stewart, eds. Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 219-34.
31. Stewart D, Law M (2003) The environment: paradigms and practice in health, occupational therapy and inquiry. In: L Letts, P Rigby, D Stewart, eds. Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 3-15.
32. Tamm M (1999) What does a home mean and when does it cease to be a home? Home as a setting for rehabilitation and care. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21(2), 49-55.
33. Tregaskis C (2002) Social Model Theory: the story so far... Disability and Society, 17(4), 457-70.
34. Whiteford G (2000) Occupational deprivation: global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(5) 200-204.
35. Wilcock A (1998) An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 24, 89.
36. Yerxa E (2000) Confessions of an occupational therapist who became a detective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(5), 192-99.
37. Zemke R, Clark F, eds (1996) Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis.