A case study of os cuneiforme mediale bipartum from sigtuna, Sweden

International Journal of Osteoarchaeology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 475-480

  Kjellström, Anna ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biological distance; Mass grave; Os cuneiforme mediale bipartum

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844339764     PISSN: 1047482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/oa.735     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Anderson T. 1988. A medieval biparte cuneiform I with attempted unilateral fusion. OSSA 13: 39-48.
2. Barclay B. 1932. A case of duplication of the internal cuneiform bone of the foot (Cuneiforme Bipartitum). Journal of Anatomy and Physiology 76: 175-177.
3. Barlow TE. 1942. Os cuneiforme I bipartitum. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 29:95-111.
4. Bergman RA, Afifi AK, Miyauchi R. 2003. Ankle and foot: tarsals, metatarsals and phalanges [Online]. Available: www.vh.org/adult/provider/ anatomy/AnatomicVariants/SkeletalSystem/Text/Ar... [2003 January 20].
5. Gardner E, Gray DJ, ÓRahilly R. 1959. The prenatal development of the skeleton and joints of the human foot. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 41A: 847-876.
6. Green WT. 1975. Painful bipartite patellae - a report of three cases. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 110: 197-200.
7. Kjellström A. 2000. En medeltida massgrav från Sigtuna, Sverige. Tolkning och Diskussion kring ett flertal skelett med spår efter trauma. Hikuin 27: 265-276.
8. Scheuer L, Black S. 2000. Developmental Juvenile Osteology. Academic Press: London.
9. Schreiber A, Differding P, Zollinger H. 1985. Talus Partitus. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 67B: 430-431.