Developing a taxonomy for rehabilitation outcome measurement

Rehabilitation Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 15-23

  Mermis, Bernie J ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; TAXONOMY;

EID: 14844337886     PISSN: 00905550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.1.15     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. American Psychological Association. (2003). Procedural manual and guide for a standardized application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): A manual for health professionals [Sample and prototype]. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Angelle, S. M., Fuchs, K. L., High, W. M., Hall, K. M., Kreutzer, J. S., & Rosenthal, M. (1999). The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: An assessment of factor structure and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1303-1308.
3. ATOMS: Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System. (2004). University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
4. Boake, C. (1996). Supervision Rating Scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 765-772.
5. Brandt, E. N., & Pope, A. M. (Eds.). (1997). Enabling American: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Burn Model Systems Projects. (2004). Denver, CO: National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Preventive & Biometrics-Section of Medical Informatics.
7. Butler, C., Chambers, H., Goldstein, M., Harris, S., Leach, J., Campbell, S., et al. (2001). Evaluating research in disabilities: A conceptual framework for reviewing treatment outcomes. Rosemont, IL: Treatment Outcomes Committee, American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine.
8. Carey, R. G., & Posavac, E. J. (1982). Rehabilitation Program Evaluation using a Revised Level of Rehabilitation Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 367-370.
9. Clark, M. E., Gironda, R. J., & Young, R. W. (2003). Development and validation of the Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-VA. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 40, 381-396.
10. COMBI: The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. (2004). Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Santa Clara, CA.
11. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine-PVA. (1999). Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury: Clinical practice guidelines for health care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America.
12. Corrigan, J. D. (1989). Development of a scale for assessment of agitation following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 261-277.
13. Coyle, C. P., Kinney, W. B., Riley, B., & Shank, J. W. (Eds.). (1991). Benefits of therapeutic recreation: A consensus view. Ravensdale, WA: Idyll Arbor.
14. Crewe, N. M., & Athelstan, G. T. (1981). Functional Assessment in Vocational Rehabilitation: A systematic approach to diagnosis and goal setting. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 62, 299-305.
15. Crewe, N. M., & Dijkers, M. (1995). Functional assessment. In L. A. Cushman & M. Scherer (Eds.), Psychological assessment in medical rehabilitation (pp. 101-144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Dahmer, E. R., Shilling, M. A., Hamilton, B. B., Bontke, K. D., Englander, J., Kreutzer, J. F., et al. (1993). A model systems database for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8(2), 12-25.
17. De Jong, G. (2003, November). Should rehabilitation providers disclose their outcomes? Paper presented at the 1st Annual Medical Rehabilitation Educational Conference, American Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association, Las Vegas, NV.
18. De Jong, G., Horn, S. D., Gassaway, J. A., Slavin, M. D., & Dijkers, M. P. (2004). Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 678-686.
19. De Jong, G., Slavin, M. D., & Gassaway, J. (2002, October). Potential criteria for a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Philadelphia.
20. De Vivo, M. J., Jackson, A. B., Dijkers, M. P., & Becker, B. E. (1999). Current research outcomes from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1163-1164.
21. Diener E., Emmons, R., Larsen, J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
22. Dobrzykwski, E. A., & Nance, T. (1997). The Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes (FOTO) Outpatient Orthopedic Rehabilitation Data Base: Results of 1994-1966. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measures, 1(1), 56-60.
23. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 166-206.
24. Donaldson, S. W., Wagner, C. C., & Gresham, G. E. (1973). A unified ADL evaluation form. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 54, 175-179.
25. Duncan, P. (2004). Stroke Impact Scale. Gainesville, FL: Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development and Rehabilitation Research and Development, Center of Excellence.
26. Ehrlich, E., Flexner, S. B., Carruth, G., & Hawkins, J. M. (1980). Oxford American dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Fairbank, J. C., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O'Brien, J. P. (1980). The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy, 66, 271-273.
28. Feibleman, J. K. (1954). Theory of integrative levels. Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5, 59-66.
29. Feibleman, J. K. (1982). Technology and reality. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
30. Finch, E., Brooks, D., Stratford, P. W., & Mayo, N. E. (2002). Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. Baltimore: William & Wilkins.
31. Frey, W. D., & Nieuwenhuijsen, R. R. (1990). The Ertomis Assessment Method: An innovative job placement strategy. In M. Berkowitz (Ed.), Forging link ages: Modifying disability benefit programs to encourage employment (pp. 121-156). New York: Rehabilitation International.
32. Fuhrer, M. J., (1997). Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
33. Goldstein, L. B., Bertels, C., & Davis, J. M. (1989). Interrater reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale. Archives of Neurology, 46, 660-662.
34. Granger, C. V., Albrecht, G. L., & Hamilton, B. B. (1979). Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: Measurement by Pulses Profile and the Barthel Index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 145-154.
35. Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., Keith, R. A., Zielezny, M., & Sherwin, F. S. (1986). Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 1, 59-74.
36. Gresham, G. E., Phillips, T. F., & Labi, M. L. C. (1980). ADL status in stroke: Relative merits of three standard indexes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61, 355-358.
37. Haffey, W. J., & Johnston, M. V. (1990). A functional assessment system for real world rehabilitation outcomes. In D. Tupper & K. Cicerone (Eds.), The neuropsychology of everyday life (pp. 99-124). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
38. Hagglund, K. J., & Andreson, E. (2000). A critical review of psychosocial measures in spinal cord injury outcomes research [Final report]. Jackson Heights, NY: American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers.
39. Hall, K. M., Hamilton, B. B., Gordon, W. A., & Zasler, N. D. (1993). Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Assessment Measure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 60-74.
40. Harvey, R. F., & Jellinek, H. M. (1981). Functional Performance Assessment: A program approach. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 62, 456-461.
41. Health Outcomes Institute. (1993). Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) 2.0 user guide. Bloomington, MN: Author.
42. Hibbard, M. R. (1990, October). Unawareness in stroke patients: A problem of the mind, not the body. Paper presented at the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.
43. Johnson, M., Maas, M., & Moorehead, S. (Eds.). (2000). Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). St Louis, MO: Mosby.
44. Johnston, B., & Stonnington, H. H. (2001). Rehabilitation of neuropsychological disorders: A practical guide for rehabilitation professionals. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
45. Johnston, M. V., Keith, R. A., & Hinderer, S. R. (1992). Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(12, Suppl.), S3-S23.
46. Katz, M. M., & Lyerly, S. B. (1963). Methods for measuring adjustment and social behavior in the community. I: Rational, description, discriminative validity and scale development. Psychological Reports, 13, 503-535.
47. Kelley-Hayes, M., Robertson, J. T., Broderick, J. P., Duncan, P. W., Hershey, L. A., Roth, E. J., et al. (1998). The American Heart Association stroke outcome classification. Stroke, 29, 1274-1280.
48. Latham, N. K., & Haley, S. M. (2003). Measuring functional outcomes across postacute care: Current challenges and future directions. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 15(2), 83-98.
49. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
50. Malec, J. F., & Thompson, J. S. (1994). Relationship of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory to functional outcome and cognitive performance measures. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9, 1-16.
51. Marwitz, J. H., & Kreutzer, J. S. (1996). The Service Obstacles Scale (SOS). Richmond, VA: Medical College of Virginia Commonwealth University.
52. Mattison, P. G., Aitken, R. C. B., & Prescott, R. J. (1991). Rehabilitation Status-The relationship between the Edinburgh Rehabilitation Status Scale (ERSS), Barthel Index, and PULSES profile. International Disability Studies, 13, 9-11.
53. Mayer, T. G., Tencer, A. F., Kristoferson, S., & Mooney, V. (1984). Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine, 9, 588-595.
54. McBurney, H., Morrow, L., Briffa, T., & Norton, K. (2004). Performance indicators for cardiac rehabilitation. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Australian Cardiac Rehabilitation Association.
55. Merbitz, C. T. (1996). Frequency measures of behavior for assistive technology and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 8, 121-130.
56. Merbitz, C. T., Morris, J., & Grip, J. C. (1989). Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 308-312.
57. Mermis, B. (2002, March). Psychosocial rehabilitation outcome measurement. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Division 22 Mid Winter Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
58. Mermis, B., Bosshart, H., Evans, R., Freedman, J., Hansen, N., Heinemann, A., et al. (1996). Psychological, social, vocational topics for SCI outcomes. Jackson Heights, NY: American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers Outcomes Task Force.
59. Mermis, B., Bosshart, H. Evans, R., Freedman, J., Hansen, N., Heinemann, A., et al. (1998). Outcome measures in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Outlook, 3(1), 8-9.
60. Mermis, B., Hagglund, K., Whiteneck, G., Merbitz, C. T., Rosenthal, M., & Heinemann, A. (2002, August). The science and politics of rehabilitation psychology outcome measurement. Paper presented at the 110th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
61. Mermis, B., Heinemann, A., Merbitz, C. T., & Whiteneck, G. (1994, September). Outcome evaluation in rehabilitation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers, Las Vegas, NV.
62. Meyers, A. R., Andreson, E. M., & Hagglund, K. J. (2000). A model of outcomes research: Spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12, Suppl. 2), 581-590.
63. Mullen, E. J., & Magnabosco, J. L. (1997). Outcome measures for social work practitioners in health care. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers Press.
64. Nagi, S. Z. (1969). Disability & rehabilitation: Legal, clinical & self concepts & measurements. Columbus, OH. Ohio State University Press.
65. National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. (1993). Research plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NIH Publication No. 93-3509). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
66. National Outcomes Measurement System. (2004). Rockville, MD: American-Speech-Language-Hearing-Association.
67. Outcomes [Special issue]. (2000). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12, Suppl. 2).
68. Outcomes evaluation in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation [Special issue]. (1994). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(12, Suppl.).
69. Pittock, S. J., Mayr, W. T., McClelland, R. L., Jorgensen, N. W., Weigand, S. D., Noseworthy, J. H., & Rodriguez, M. (2004). Disability Profile of M.S. did not change over 10 years in a population based prevalence cohort. Neurology, 62, 601-606.
70. Prigatano, G. (1986). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
71. Rao, N., & Kilgore, K. M. (1992). Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 911-916.
72. Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission. (1998). Performance indicators for rehabilitation programs, Version 1.1: Working Paper for comment. Tucson, AZ: Commission for Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities.
73. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. (1987). Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Functional Assessment Scale (RIC-FAS). Chicago: Author.
74. SM. (1992). An evaluation system for outpatient rehabilitation programs. Chicago: Formations in Health Care.
75. Sarno, J. E., Sarno, M. T., & Levita, E. (1973). The Functional Life Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 54, 214-220.
76. Scherer, M. J. (1991). Matching person and technology model (and assessment instruments). Rochester, NY: Author.
77. Schuling, J., de Haan, R., Limburg, M., & Groenier, K. H. (1993). The Frenchay Activities Index: Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke, 24, 1173-1177.
78. Seaby, L. S., & Torrance, G. M. (1994, June). Measurement properties of the physiotherapy clinical outcomes variables (COVS): A mobility functional assessment. Platform presentation at the 1994 Joint Congress of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association and the America Physical Therapy Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
79. Shontz, F. C., (1975). The psychological aspects of physical illness and disability. New York: MacMillan.
80. Smith, R. O. (1992). OT FACT software and operation manual. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
81. Spinal cord injury [Special issue]. (1999). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(11).
82. Spiteri, L. F. (1995, Summer). The classification research group and the theory of integrative levels. The Katherine Sharp Review, 1-6.
83. Stumbo, N. J. (2003). Client outcomes in therapeutic recreation services. State College, PA.: Venture.
84. Torenbeek, M., Bacciglieri, P., Pepe, F., Cantgallo, A., & Van Harten, W. (Eds.). (2000). Rehabilitation outcome measures in Europe. Enschede, the Netherlands: R & D Roessingh.
85. Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., et al. (2003). Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. PAIN, 106, 337-345.
86. Ware, J. E. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(Suppl. 2), 543-551.
87. Whiteneck, G. G. (1994). Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 1073-1076.
88. Whiteneck, G. G., Charlifue, S. W., Gerhart, K. A., Overholser, J. D., & Richardson, G. N. (1992). Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 519-526.
89. Whiteneck, G. G., Fougeyrolles, P., & Gerhart, K. A. (1997). Elaborating the Model of Disablement. In M. Fuhrer (Ed.), Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
90. Wilkerson, D. (1995, December/January). Developing outcomes management tools. Rehabilitation Management, 114-129.
91. Willer, B., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J. S., Gordon, W. A., & Rempel, R. (1993). Assessment of community interaction following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 75-87.
92. Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273(1), 59-65.
93. World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairment: Disability and handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
94. World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases 10. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
95. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
96. Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1989). Observations are always ordinal; Measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 857-860.
97. Wright, J. (1992). Statistical considerations in the interpretation of Functional Outcome Scales. Neurorehabilitation, 2(4), 21-30.