Overview of observational studies of low-dose helical computed tomography screening for lung cancer

Respirology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 97-104

  Manser, Renee L ^a,b   Irving, Louis B ^b   De Campo, Margaret P ^c   Abramson, Michael J ^e   Stone, Christine A ^c   Pedersen, Karen E ^f   Elwood, Mark ^f   Campbell, Donald A ^d  

^a Clinical Epidemiology and Health Services Evaluation Unit   (Australia)

^b ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c Department of Diagnostic Imaging ^*  (Australia)

^d MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^e ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f National Cancer Control Initiative   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Lung neoplasm; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

BIOAVAILABILITY; CANCER CENTER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; EMPLOYEE; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; LUNG SURGERY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPUTUM ANALYSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; SPUTUM; SURVIVAL RATE; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 14844325364     PISSN: 13237799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00590.x     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Lopez A. The lung cancer epidemic in developed countries. In: Lopez AD, Caselli G, Valkonen T (eds). Adult Mortality in Developed Countries: From Description to Explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995; 111-34.
2. Ries LA. Influence of extent of disease, histology and demographic factors on lung cancer survival in the SEER population-based data. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 1994; 10: 21-30.
3. Manser RL, Irving LB, Stone C, Byrnes G, Abramson M, Campbell D. Screening for lung cancer (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library 2004; 1. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
4. Kubik A, Parkin DM, Khlat M, Erban J, Polak J, Adamec M. Lack of benefit from semi-annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high-risk males in Czechoslovakia. Int. J. Cancer 1990; 45: 26-33.
5. Flehinger BJ, Kimmel M, Polyak T, Melamed MR. Screening for lung cancer. The Mayo Lung Project revisited. Cancer 1993; 72: 1573-80.
6. Tockman MS. Survival and mortality from lung cancer in a screened population. Chest 1986; 89: 324S-325S.
7. Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR. Current status of screening for lung cancer. Chest Surg. Clin. N. Am. 1994; 4: 1-15.
8. Henschke C, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354: 99-105.
9. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 1998; 351: 1242-5.
10. Patz EF Jr, Goodman PC, Bepler G. Screening for lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 343: 1627-33.
11. Morrison A. Screening. In: Rothman K, Greenland S (eds). Modern Epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, 1998; 499-518.
12. National Cancer Control Initiative Working Group on Lung Cancer Screening. Lung Cancer Screening by Helical Computed Tomography [Internet]. National Cancer Control Initiative, Melbourne, 2003; 1-85. [Cited June 2003]. Available from URL: http://www.ncci.org.au/pdf/HCT_screen_report.pdf
13. Elwood M, Campbell DA, de Campo MP. Helical computed tomography for lung cancer screening. Med. J. Aust. 2003; 179: 125-6.
14. Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: initial findings on repeat screening. Cancer 2001; 92: 153-9.
15. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Lenzen H, Semik M, Thomas M, Peters PE. Screening for asymptomatic early bronchogenic carcinoma with low dose CT of the chest. Cancer 2000; 89 (Suppl.): 2483-4.
16. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT. prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002; 222: 773-81.
17. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996; 201: 798-802.
18. Sobue T, Moriyama N, Kaneko M et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: Anti-Lung Cancer Association project. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002; 20: 911-20.
19. Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG et al. Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br. J. Cancer 2001; 84: 25-32.
20. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002; 165: 508-13.
21. Tiitola M, Kivisaari L, Huuskonen MS et al. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in asbestos-exposed workers. Lung Cancer 2002; 35: 17-22.
22. Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C et al. Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2 year results. Lancet 2003; 362: 593-7.
23. Nawa T, Nakagawa T, Kusano S, Kawasaki Y, Sugawara Y, Nakata H. Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT. results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. Chest 2002; 122: 15-20.
24. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003; 226: 756-61.
25. Kakinuma R., Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al. Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings. Radiology 1999; 212: 61-6.
26. Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD et al. Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: Serial CT scanning. Radiology 2002; 223: 798-805.
27. Mahadevia PJ, Fleisher LA, Frick KD, Eng J, Goodman SN, Powe NR. Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 2003; 289: 313-22.
28. Lederle FA, Niewoehner DE. Lung cancer surgery: A critical review of the evidence. Arch. Intern. Med. 1994; 154: 2397-400.