Study of subjectivity in the perception of cesarean birth

Nursing and Health Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-8

  Park, Chai Soon ^a   Yeoum, Soon Gyo ^b   Choi, Euy Soon ^a  

^a Seoul Metropolitan Government Seobuk Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cesarean birth; Childbirth; Delivery mode; Q methodology; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRIVE; EGO; EMOTION; FAMILY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INCOME; INTERVIEW; LABOR; LABOR PAIN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; NURSING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THINKING;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERSONALITY; PREGNANCY; Q-SORT;

EID: 14844323971     PISSN: 14410745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00206.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Burns LR, Geller SE, Wholey DR. The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision. Med. Care 1995; 33: 365-382.
2. Chang MJ. A study on the relationship between family support and self concept of cesarean delivery paturient. Dissertation. Seoul: Graduate School of Chung Ang University, 1991.
3. Cibils LA. On intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996; 174: 382-389.
4. Fawcett J, Pollio N, Tully A, Baron M, Henklein JC, Jones RC. Effects of information on adaptation to cesarean birth. Nurs. Res. 1993; 42: 49-53.
5. Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 2000; 27: 256-263.
6. Glazener CMA, Abdalla M, Stroud P, Naji S, Templeton A, Russel IT. Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1995; 102: 282-287.
7. Graham WJ, Hundley V, McCheyne AL, Hall MH, Gurney E, Milne J. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996; 106: 213-220.
8. Greene R, Gardeli F, Turner MJ. Long-term implications of cesarean sections. Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997; 176: 254-255.
9. Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996; 174: 1569-1574.
10. Hong CJ. The effect of the pain control technique on relief of postoperative pain and post partum depression. Chung Ang Medicine 1997; 437: 713-731.
11. Jackson NV, Irvine LM. The influence of maternal request on the elective cesarean section rate. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1998; 18: 115-119.
12. Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs. Annual Report of Statistics. Seoul: Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 1999.
13. Lampman C, Phelps A. College student's knowledge and attitudes about cesarean birth. Birth 1997; 24: 159-164.
14. Littleton LY. Maternal, Neonatal, and Women's Health Nursing. New York: Delmar Thomson Learning, 2002.
15. MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 46-50.
16. May KA, Mahlmeister LR. Maternal and Neonatal Nursing-Family-Centered Care, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1994.
17. Mould TJM, Chong S, Spencer JAD, Gallivan S. Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarian section and their degree of satisfaction. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 103: 1074-1077.
18. Ryding EL. Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean section for personal reasons. Acta. Obstet. Gynaecol. Scand. 1993; 72: 280-285.
19. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson GN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Sphincter disruption during vaginal deliveries. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993; 329: 1905-1911.