The status of women in pharmacy education: Persisting gaps and issues

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1-11

  Svarstad, Bonnie L ^a   Draugalis, JoLaine R ^b   Meyer, Susan M ^c   Mount, Jeanine K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF PHARMACY   (United States)

Author keywords

Faculty; Pharmacy education; Women

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GENDER; HOSPITAL PHARMACY; HUMAN; INFORMATION; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PUBLICATION; SALARY; SOCIAL STATUS; TIME;

EID: 14844318560     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj680379     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rossiter M. Women Scientists in America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD, 1995.
2. Glazer-Raymo J. Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
3. Etzkowitz H, Kemelgor C, Uzzi B. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
4. Reskin B, Roos P. Job Queues, Gender Queues. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press, 1990.
5. Bell L. The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 2000-2001. Available at: http://www.aaup.org/surveys/02z/z02rep.htm. Accessed February 11, 2003.
6. Benjamin E. Disparities in the salaries and appointments of academic women and men: An update of a 1988 report of Committee W on the status of women in the academic profession. Available at: http://www.aaup.org/issues/WomeninHE/ Wrepup.htm. Accessed February 11, 2003.
7. Committee on the economic status of the profession. Unequal progress: the annual report on the economic status of the profession 2002-2003. Academe. 2003:89; 22-49.
8. 2002-2003 Profile of Pharmacy Faculty. Alexandria, Va: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Available at: http://www.aacp.org. Accessed February 11, 2003.
9. Zuckerman H, Cole J, Bruer J. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1991.
10. Valian V. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1998.
11. Creamer EG. Assessing Faculty Publication Productivity: Issues of Equity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Washington. DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development. 1998;26:75.
12. Henderson ML. Descriptive survey of women pharmacy faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 1979;43:191-194.
13. Henderson ML, Broedel-Zaugg K. A historical perspective on women pharmacy faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63:402-405.
14. Henderson ML. American Women Pharmacists: Contributions to the Profession. New York, NY: Pharmaceutical Products Press, 2002.
15. Hewlett S. Executive women and the myth of having it all. Harv Bus Rev. 2002;80:66-73.
16. Roche V, Haddad A, Matuszak A. Current approaches and perceived barriers to scholarship in women pharmacy faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. 1991;55:236-242.
17. Profile of pharmacy students. Alexandria, Va: American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Available at: http://www.aacp.org. Accessed February 11, 2003.
18. Triggle D, Miller K. Commission on the Future of Graduate Education in the Pharmaceutical Sciences: Final report, 2001. Available at: http://www.aacp.org Accessed February 11, 2003.
19. Miller K. Building graduate program enrollment. Paper presented at the 2001 AACP Graduate Forum, Toronto, Ontario, 2001.
20. Brown G, Van Ummersen C, Phair J. Breaking the Barriers: Presidential Strategies for Enhancing Career Mobility. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2001.
21. AAPS awards list. Available at: http://aapspharmaceutica.com/resources/ fellows/awardslist. Accessed on February 11, 2003.
22. Perna LW. Sex differences in faculty salaries: a cohort analysis [paper]. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 2000.
23. Williams J. The subtle side of discrimination: linking merit raises to outside offers may discriminate against female professors with families. Chron High Educ. 2003;49:C5.
24. Nettles M, Perna LW, Bradbum EM, Zimbler L. Salary, Promotion, and Tenure Status of Minority and Women Faculty in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education (NCES 2000-173), 2000.
25. Haignere L. Paychecks: A Guide to Conducting Salary-Equity Studies for Higher Education Faculty. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors, 2002.
26. Fidell LS. Empirical verification of sex discriminiation in hiring practices in psychology. In: Unger K, Denmark FL (eds). Woman: Dependent or Independent Variable? New York, NY: Psychological Dimensions; 1975:774-82.
27. Golde CM. After the offer, before the deal: negotiating a first academic job. Academe. 1999;85:44-49.
28. Madsen MK. Women administrators in higher education. In: Collins LH, Chrisler JC, Quina K (eds). Career Strategies for Women in Academe: Arming Athena. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998: 209-12.
29. Brown G, Van Ummersen C, Sturnick J. From Where We Sit: Women's Perspectives on the Presidency. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2001.